On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "util" is meant to be for shared utility across the entire code base - >> both Mesa and Gallium. It's been growing slowly as people move things >> there. It might make sense to move a lot of src/gallium/auxiliary/util >> there, in fact - there's always been a lot of duplication between Mesa >> and Gallium's utility code. But that's up to the Gallium developers. >> > Imho currently the util library is growing on the basis of "we can > share X let's throw it in there" rather than putting much thought > about the structure/"design" of it - unlike in gallium.
Are you serious? Let's be honest with ourselves. I probably would have been a better plan to not put commonly useful code deep in Gallium in the first place. Apparently this is what I get for trying to do the right thing an pull the atomics code out into a place the rest of the Mesa project can use it. How about instead of an annoying bikeshed thread we just finish moving bits of Gallium's util directory to src/util and be done with it? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
