On Friday, 2019-05-24 07:49:37 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 5/23/19 8:22 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 20:25, Eric Engestrom
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, 2019-05-23 08:34:40 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > > > Hi;
> > > >
> > > > On 5/22/19
On 5/23/19 8:22 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 20:25, Eric Engestrom wrote:
On Thursday, 2019-05-23 08:34:40 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi;
On 5/22/19 9:20 PM, Alistair Strachan wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:10 PM Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 5/21/19 4:53 PM, S
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 20:25, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 2019-05-23 08:34:40 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > On 5/22/19 9:20 PM, Alistair Strachan wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:10 PM Tapani Pälli
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/21/19 4:53 PM,
On Thursday, 2019-05-23 08:34:40 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Hi;
>
> On 5/22/19 9:20 PM, Alistair Strachan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:10 PM Tapani Pälli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/21/19 4:53 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > First up, my apolog
Hi;
On 5/22/19 9:20 PM, Alistair Strachan wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:10 PM Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 5/21/19 4:53 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hello everyone,
First up, my apologies on not being able to respond earlier; secondly,
thanks very much for your review.
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 19:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:10 PM Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/19 4:53 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > First up, my apologies on not being able to respond earlier; secondly,
> > thanks very much for your review.
> >
> > On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 19:27, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >
On 5/21/19 4:53 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hello everyone,
First up, my apologies on not being able to respond earlier; secondly,
thanks very much for your review.
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 19:27, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 08:18, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 5/13/19 6:52 P
Hello everyone,
First up, my apologies on not being able to respond earlier; secondly,
thanks very much for your review.
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 19:27, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 08:18, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5/13/19 6:52 PM, Haehnle, Nicolai wrote:
>
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 08:18, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 5/13/19 6:52 PM, Haehnle, Nicolai wrote:
> > This approach seems entirely incompatible with si_debug_options.h, and
> > will be an absolute maintenance nightmare going forward for adding /
> > removing options, because you're intr
On 5/13/19 6:52 PM, Haehnle, Nicolai wrote:
This approach seems entirely incompatible with si_debug_options.h, and
will be an absolute maintenance nightmare going forward for adding /
removing options, because you're introducing a second location where
options are defined.
Quite frankly, this s
This approach seems entirely incompatible with si_debug_options.h, and
will be an absolute maintenance nightmare going forward for adding /
removing options, because you're introducing a second location where
options are defined.
Quite frankly, this seems like a terrible idea as-is.
If you rea
Mesa uses libexpat for many configuration parsing needs; however some
userspaces like Android may not want to use libexpat for various reasons -
eg some might restrict reading of any config xml files from filesystems.
This patchset proposes a simple lookup mechanism for the default values
as per c
12 matches
Mail list logo
