On 5/21/19 4:53 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hello everyone,

First up, my apologies on not being able to respond earlier; secondly,
thanks very much for your review.

On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 19:27, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 08:18, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> wrote:


On 5/13/19 6:52 PM, Haehnle, Nicolai wrote:
This approach seems entirely incompatible with si_debug_options.h, and
will be an absolute maintenance nightmare going forward for adding /
removing options, because you're introducing a second location where
options are defined.

Quite frankly, this seems like a terrible idea as-is.

If you really can't use XML for whatever reason, then please find some
way of deriving both the tables here and the XML from the same single
source of truth.

I was looking at this yesterday and came up with same conclusion. We
should have the options in one place. Currently libexpat is statically
linked with Android >=O, maybe for such restricted environments we could
just inline the xml as is at compile time and parse that later or
alternatively (maybe cleaner) parse and generate default option cache
already during compilation?

I realise that jumping the "me too" train does not help much, so here
are some alternative ideas.

How about we first distil the reasons why this is a problem and what
kind. Then explore independent solution for each one - as-is this
seems like a one-size-fits-all approach.
I totally agree that this seems like a rudimentary / ugly approach,
and we can definitely improve upon it once the reasons are discussed.

Some examples:
  - XML file may be inaccessible - the in-driver defaults should work(tm)
Yes there are some app specific ones, yet neither(?) of these apps is
present on Android
  - libexpat is not available, but libFOO is - investigate into a compat wrapper
  - cannot use external libraries (libexpat or equivalent) - static link


AFAIU, in the Android space, it is a combination of some of the above:
a. current Android doesn't allow GL drivers to access config files
from the vendor partition: this is enforced via selinux policy.

For point a, vendors can (and should) define their own policy rules regarding what file access and ioctl's are required. This is done by setting BOARD_SEPOLICY_DIRS in BoardConfig.mk file. That directory then contains all the necessary rules required for the particular driver to work. As example:

BOARD_SEPOLICY_DIRS += device/samsung/tuna/sepolicy

If a vendor wanted to use xml based configuration for Mesa it should be possible by setting a sepolicy rule so that particular library is able to access such file. Looking at Android Celadon selinux files, 'file_contexts' is probably the place to do it.

b. Also, they had some concerns around how safe libexpat is vis-a-vis
dual-loading, and that's where the concern around static linking came
from.

Alistair, could you please correct me if I am wrong, and if there are
additional details on the need of this?


// Tapani
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to