On 20 November 2015 at 18:47, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:18:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 18 November 2015 at 21:59, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sarah Sharp
>> > wrote:
>> >>> There's not really a consensus I guess, but most people do lea
Ping? I believe all the concerns about this patchset (and the DRM patch
to add KBL) have been addressed. Can someone push this to master? Shall
I rebase and resend the patches?
Sarah Sharp
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:40:53AM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Add PCI IDs for the Intel Kabylake platforms.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> > FWIW I wholeheartedly agree with this line of reasoning. I never put
>> > the version info into my commits either, and find it
>> > confusing/misleading when others do. I want to know the final state of
>> > things when looking at the commi
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:18:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 November 2015 at 21:59, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sarah Sharp
> > wrote:
> >>> There's not really a consensus I guess, but most people do leave the
> >>> version
> >>> information in the final com
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:18:56PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 November 2015 at 21:59, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sarah Sharp
> > wrote:
> >>> There's not really a consensus I guess, but most people do leave the
> >>> version
> >>> information in the final com
On 18 November 2015 at 21:59, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sarah Sharp
> wrote:
>>> There's not really a consensus I guess, but most people do leave the version
>>> information in the final commit message.
>>
>> I personally feel like that's leaving boredom doodles on a f
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:20:28PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:40:53AM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>> > Add PCI IDs for the Intel Kabylake platforms. The IDs are taken
>> > directly from the Linux kernel patches, whi
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
>> There's not really a consensus I guess, but most people do leave the version
>> information in the final commit message.
>
> I personally feel like that's leaving boredom doodles on a final
> architectural drawing. If people want to know the b
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:20:28PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:40:53AM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > Add PCI IDs for the Intel Kabylake platforms. The IDs are taken
> > directly from the Linux kernel patches, which are under review:
> >
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:40:53AM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Add PCI IDs for the Intel Kabylake platforms. The IDs are taken
> directly from the Linux kernel patches, which are under review:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/078967.html
> http://cgit.freedesktop.o
Add PCI IDs for the Intel Kabylake platforms. The IDs are taken
directly from the Linux kernel patches, which are under review:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/078967.html
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=kbl-upstream-v2
The Kabylake PCI IDs take
11 matches
Mail list logo
