On 2018-01-17 06:35 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
On 2018-01-17 08:01 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 04.01.2018 18:37, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
On 2018-01-04 12:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Is the renaming necessary? It looks like everyth
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-17 08:01 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>
>> On 04.01.2018 18:37, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018-01-04 12:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Is the renaming necessary? It looks like everything would be fine
On 2018-01-17 08:01 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 04.01.2018 18:37, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
On 2018-01-04 12:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Is the renaming necessary? It looks like everything would be fine if
we used the "fence" name for semaphores.
The rename was requested by nha. We could k
On 04.01.2018 18:37, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
On 2018-01-04 12:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Is the renaming necessary? It looks like everything would be fine if
we used the "fence" name for semaphores.
The rename was requested by nha. We could keep going with the fences
name. Or we could do t
On 2018-01-04 12:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Is the renaming necessary? It looks like everything would be fine if
we used the "fence" name for semaphores.
The rename was requested by nha. We could keep going with the fences
name. Or we could do the whole rename afterwards. I'm fine with eith
Is the renaming necessary? It looks like everything would be fine if
we used the "fence" name for semaphores.
Marek
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
> Rename fences -> semaphores in preparation for upgrading fence
> functionality.
>
> This series renames the following sym
On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Andres Rodriguez
mailto:andre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Rename fences -> semaphores in preparation for upgrading fence
functionality.
This series renames the following symbols:
- pipe_fence_handle -> pipe_semaphore_handle
- fence_server_sync -> semaphore_server_sync
