> Hmm I thought I pushed those in a couple of days ago. Doing it now, thanks !
No, thank you 8-)
>> This is one of those
>> contexts in which things could be done marginally more elegantly with
>> C++. I am proficient enough with C macros and xincludes that I could
>> probably hack together somet
On 4 December 2015 at 13:27, Giuseppe Bilotta
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> With the small comment in patch 3 addressed the series is
>> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov
>
> And also:
>
>> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick
>
> for patch 1 and 2. Who should I ping fo
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> With the small comment in patch 3 addressed the series is
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov
And also:
> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick
for patch 1 and 2. Who should I ping for to get them pushed? ;-)
>>> The long version:
>>> 1. Grep for R
On 30 November 2015 at 22:06, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 1 December 2015 at 07:18, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 30 November 2015 at 20:00, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2015 07:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Giuseppe,
On 28 November 2015 at 15:43, Giuseppe Bilotta
wrote:
> T
On 11/30/2015 02:06 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 1 December 2015 at 07:18, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 30 November 2015 at 20:00, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2015 07:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Giuseppe,
On 28 November 2015 at 15:43, Giuseppe Bilotta
wrote:
> The seco
On 1 December 2015 at 07:18, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 30 November 2015 at 20:00, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 11/29/2015 07:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Hi Giuseppe,
>>>
>>> On 28 November 2015 at 15:43, Giuseppe Bilotta
>>> wrote:
The second and third patches are mostly aimed at removing no
On 30 November 2015 at 20:00, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 07:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hi Giuseppe,
>>
>> On 28 November 2015 at 15:43, Giuseppe Bilotta
>> wrote:
>>> The second and third patches are mostly aimed at removing non-spurious
>>> compiler warnings. The first one is just mi
On 11/29/2015 07:21 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe,
>
> On 28 November 2015 at 15:43, Giuseppe Bilotta
> wrote:
>> The second and third patches are mostly aimed at removing non-spurious
>> compiler warnings. The first one is just minor whitespace cleanup in the
>> general area of code touc
Hello Emil,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> With the small comment in patch 3 addressed the series is
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov
Thanks. I was pretty sure the comment was wrong when I copied it over
from the other file, but I thought I might have been missing something
o
Hi Giuseppe,
On 28 November 2015 at 15:43, Giuseppe Bilotta
wrote:
> The second and third patches are mostly aimed at removing non-spurious
> compiler warnings. The first one is just minor whitespace cleanup in the
> general area of code touched by the second patch.
>
> Giuseppe Bilotta (3):
>
The second and third patches are mostly aimed at removing non-spurious
compiler warnings. The first one is just minor whitespace cleanup in the
general area of code touched by the second patch.
Giuseppe Bilotta (3):
radeon: whitespace cleanup
radeon: const correctness
xvmc: force assertion i
11 matches
Mail list logo
