On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> While we're on the subject: if someone wanted to fix framebuffer init
> in Mesa so that window-system buffers were allocated as needed (z/s and
> friends), we could change xserver (and EGL) to be less of a polynomial
> explosion of fbconfigs..
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 16:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Was thinking of that one but forgot to explicitly mention it. What is
> the "age gap" between the xserver and the dri modules that you ship ?
> I'm thinking that the above 3 years "gap" + ~9months of deprecation
> period should be fine with
On 25 April 2016 at 16:33, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 15:21 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> Last a I saw you guys were backporting all of mesa, correct ?
>> Are you OK with us deprecating compat. between DRI(2) modules and
>> loaders (GL/EGL/gbm) that are, say 3 years apart ?
>
>
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 15:21 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Last a I saw you guys were backporting all of mesa, correct ?
> Are you OK with us deprecating compat. between DRI(2) modules and
> loaders (GL/EGL/gbm) that are, say 3 years apart ?
At this point that's probably fine. RHEL6 still includes
On 24 April 2016 at 23:46, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 24 April 2016 at 15:41, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>>> 2016-04-24 21:50 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
On 24 April 2016 at 14:20, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Mar
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 24 April 2016 at 15:41, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> 2016-04-24 21:50 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>>> On 24 April 2016 at 14:20, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:16 PM,
On 24 April 2016 at 15:41, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2016-04-24 21:50 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>> On 24 April 2016 at 14:20, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM,
2016-04-24 21:50 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
> On 24 April 2016 at 14:20, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
wrote:
> 2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+0
On 24 April 2016 at 14:20, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
>>> wrote:
2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>
> On 19 April 2016
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> The RGBX/RGBA pixel
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
> wrote:
>> 2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>>>
>>> On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
creat
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
wrote:
> 2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>>
>> On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
>>> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This s
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
>>> created due to the missing formats in the DRI
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
>> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
>> adds the necessary formats for c
On 22 April 2016 at 11:41, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>>
>> On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
>>> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
>
2016-04-21 21:42 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>
> On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
>> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
>> adds the necessary formats for configs and DRI images.
Hi Rob,
On 19 April 2016 at 20:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
> adds the necessary formats for configs and DRI images. Support in GBM is
> also added as it wi
Rob Herring writes:
> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
> adds the necessary formats for configs and DRI images. Support in GBM is
> also added as it will be needed soon for Android.
2016-04-20 3:38 GMT+08:00 Rob Herring :
> The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
> created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
> adds the necessary formats for configs and DRI images. Support in GBM is
> also added as it will be needed soo
The RGBX/RGBA pixel formats used in the Android EGL don't get configs
created due to the missing formats in the DRI state tracker. This series
adds the necessary formats for configs and DRI images. Support in GBM is
also added as it will be needed soon for Android.
AFAICT, this has been a long
20 matches
Mail list logo
