On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:24:08 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> We don't want to use brw->sampler.count here, as it includes samplers
> used only by the FS...which is most of them.
>
> This also lets us drop the CACHE_NEW_SAMPLER dirty bit on Gen6.
My plan for samplers was that we can just look at
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:48:03 -0800, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 09:42 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > It turns out the same messages work on gen7, we were just being paranoid.
> >
> > Fixes the penumbra shadows mode of Lightsmark since the register
> > allocation fix.
> > ---
> > src/mesa
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Now the question is: can we reapply Matt's patch, removing the
> --enable-shared-glapi option and making it always on? That would be great.
Jakob said on IRC that he didn't think this fix was correct, but I
don't know what he had in mind.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45578
--- Comment #7 from Alexander von Gluck 2012-02-11
12:59:25 PST ---
Created attachment 56902
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=56902
assertion error on Haiku
Same assertion seen on Haiku while writing new swrast driver.
--
On 02/08/2012 05:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 02/08/2012 06:07 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Brian Paulwrote:
On 02/08/2012 05:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 02/09/2012 09:42 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
It turns out the same messages work on gen7, we were just being paranoid.
Fixes the penumbra shadows mode of Lightsmark since the register
allocation fix.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(
On 02/10/2012 10:54 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
Before this patch, the HiZ op was setting the pointers to COLOR_CALC_STATE
and to BLEND_STATE to 0. This was probably safe, since the HiZ op doesn't
use the cc or the blending. And it caused no problems with Piglit and
Citybench.
But, we don't know exa
On 02/11/2012 07:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
Hi,
There are a few scientific software packages that require Mesa's GLw,
and with 8.0 we've split GLw out into a separate repository. Can we do
an 8.0 release of GLw? It passes distcheck for me.
(I guess when Kenneth splits GLU out we should have the
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> now that libtool provides them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner
>>> ---
>>
>> Ping. This is sensible, right?
>
> Sorry, I m
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
Bug #: 45932
Summary: Fails to compile with OpenGL ES support
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> now that libtool provides them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner
>> ---
>
> Ping. This is sensible, right?
Sorry, I missed this. I _think_ so. I'm kind of wary of relying on a
bolted o
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Zhigang Gong
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:46:42PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:19:38 +0800, zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Zhigang Gong
>> >
>> > If the system support tls, we prefer to enable it by default
>> > just as
Hi,
There are a few scientific software packages that require Mesa's GLw,
and with 8.0 we've split GLw out into a separate repository. Can we do
an 8.0 release of GLw? It passes distcheck for me.
(I guess when Kenneth splits GLU out we should have the same discussion)
Thanks,
Matt
[1] https://b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45920
Bug #: 45920
Summary: Exception: Attempt to use unavailable module DRM:
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
On 02/11/2012 12:31 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 02/10/2012 09:25 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
I recently discovered this text in the BSpec. It seems wise to comply,
though I haven't observed it to fix anything yet.
Fixes a regression in glean/fbo since 28cfa1fa213fe.
Eh... how do you know it fix
On 02/10/2012 09:25 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
I recently discovered this text in the BSpec. It seems wise to comply,
though I haven't observed it to fix anything yet.
Fixes a regression in glean/fbo since 28cfa1fa213fe.
Eh... how do you know it fixes the regression if you haven't observed it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45913
Pavel Ondračka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
AssignedTo|mesa-dev@lists.f
17 matches
Mail list logo
