On 15/09/15 18:24, Al Iverson via mailop.org wrote:
Is this truly having an immediate negative impact operationally? It
seems like this could be feedback you could give them directly,
offlist, without having to share it with the rest of us.
Very funny. Feedback to where? Their 1st line su
On 15/09/15 19:44, Michael Wise via mailop.org wrote:
No, it doesn't.
After all, technically Message-ID is an optional field.
I bitch and moan about that, but nobody cares... They all end up pointing to,
"SHOULD", and I can't really do anything but :'(
Yeah - it might say SHOULD, but it's exp
Hi Robert,
I'm one of the developers of Haraka.
verify=FAIL simply means that the TLS certificate presented by the peer
host could not be verified as trusted by a CA.
In the case of an MUA (which this appears to be), it would be normal as
an MUA does not usually present client TLS certificates
On 14/04/16 00:58, Al Iverson via mailop.org wrote:
Boo @ designing something so that "FAIL is really nothing is to be
concerned with."
It's the kind of thing deliverability people will now be spending the
rest of their lives explaining to clients that this big ole FAIL is to
be ignored.
Agr
On 14/04/16 01:19, Franck Martin via mailop wrote:
Have a look at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-martin-authentication-results-tls-03
may be jump to the example...
I did not pursue, but many MTA clients are sending the certificates,
meant for receiving email to the server they are connec
Hi all,
We scan mail for a domain which uses Google Apps for Education and as
part of that they use Google Groups for communications to students.
Does anyone have any idea why when someone sends a message to group
'all_staff_and_stude...@domain.com' that Google insists on sending a
single me
Hi Brandon/Steve,
On 25/04/16 22:19, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
Google groups mostly does verps style addressing for the reasons that
Steve mentions. We added support for not doing it for apps domains
going to internal addresses, but mostly that doesn't work any more
since we split deli
is, there's plenty of places and
software that with look at that PTR and say "it's dynamic" and treat it
accordingly and they don't have to use a DNSBL to determine that because
it's simple to do with heuristics.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Development
e IP address appear within the name.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Development Director
Fort Systems Ltd.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
hey're
person-to-person and not mailing-list traffic and what I can do to
rectify this.
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Fort Systems Ltd.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
: and
ip6: addresses into their record and to re-test it.
The customer just reported back to me that this worked - has anyone else
seen this behaviour and anyone from Google here that can confirm that
this is a bug.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Development Direc
a now, so I don't know what was going on then.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Vick Khera <mailto:vi...@khera.org>> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Steve Freegard
> mailto:steve.freeg...@fsl.com>> wrote:
>
>
te his own service to
> get back the control of their FBL, it will not have just a short term
> impact...
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>
--
Steve Freegard
|
Senior Produ
t; likely defer to a new middle-man to handle the implementation, and we're
> back at a single vendor.
>
> Mike
> --
> *From:* mailop on behalf of Steve Freegard
> via mailop
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2023 12:05 PM
> *To:* Support 3
Aban Dokht aban.do...@abando.de
> --
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>
--
[image: photo]
Steve Freegard
Abusix
[image: linkedin] <https:/
n this to annoy people, I did it because it's useful for
the internet in general because compromised accounts are a huge issue,
and one that causes issues for blacklist providers like us (e.g. if the
compromised accounts are on unblockable IPs, then we have less ability
to stop them), so this was
h any compatible tooling and automation.
My reading is that bad actors will find valid email addresses as part
of successful exploits and then feed those into their automated attacks.
They'll get these via database dumps, compromised hosts and phishing.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freeg
sure you'll understand that I can't really say on a public forum how
we do this. Catch me at a M3AAWG or other event and I'll give you more
details.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
_
ap domains, due to the very nature of them are more likely
to be abused in this way and I will do what I can next week to address
this and exclude them from reporting.
I've already found that SORBS and Manitu don't treat Abuse and
Postmaster role accounts differently.
Kind regards,
Hi Andrew,
On 22/03/2020 16:05, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
I didn't design this to annoy people, I did it because it's useful
for the internet in general because compromised accounts are a huge
issue, and one that causes
ould point
out to anyone that doesn't already know that both you and Rob should
have done the same as you both run competing services.
And that's the last thing I'm going to say on this matter...
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 24/03/2020 15:10, Chris via mailop wrote:
On 2020-03-24 06:36, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
I have great respect for you, but I didn't spend a considerable
amount of development time without actually being absolutely certain
about what I was doing. Your experience is not rel
und the HaveIBeenPwned API - see
https://haveibeenpwned.com/API/v3#PwnedPasswords
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
hope that this will help that situation.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ng on them. They all have Dr. Web
signatures in the headers stating that they're spam though
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
On 17/06/2020 15:28, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
A significant activity alert was detected o
uld not verify this to be abusive"...
Not being on top of the Abuse reports and having strong automation
around them is inexcusable.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 15/02/2021 15:43, Matthew Stith via mailop wrote:
MailOP Folks,
Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using
the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March
Spamhaus will start enforcing the follow error return codes for these
news codes announce
o be novel to us and is updated every
minute.
There's a free trial available on our website if you're interested and
you're welcome to contact me off-list.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
On 21/09/2021 16:08, Alessio Cecchi vi
tware or
service somewhere that treated messages sent with VERP differently to
regular messages? Maybe this spammer discovered this (and I'm sure
it's probably true somewhere) and uses it to improve their
deliverability to some places.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Pr
d " -
abuseable web form
2a01:7e01::f03c:92ff:fee3:7758 - infected/compromised host
2a01:7e01::f03c:91ff:fece:24e8 - ""Sparkasse" " -
compromised account
Hope that helps.
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
Steve Freegard
Senior Product Owner
Abusix Intelligence
On 25/11/2021 1
that: this particular email did not pop into my
> inbox either.
>
> After having looked a bit deeper into this, it appears that Steve
> Freegard replied directly and only to Jarland Donnell on 21 Feb, 12:10
> (timezone?).
>
> Jarland Donnell in turn has then replied publicly to the lis
is someone (bigger than personal) using
> it? Or do you know someone who is using it? What is/can be
> the reason to use it?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Slavko
> https://www.slavino.sk/
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
32 matches
Mail list logo
