u want to check your data.
Stefano
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
--
Best regards
Jesper Sörtoft
Deliverability Specialist
Stormgatan 11, 211 20 Malmö
www.apsis.se
___
;t contant their thousands of (opt-in) recipients/customers to click
"this is not spam".
Anyone seen the same, or does anyone from Microsoft have any insight?
Is it the same as a few months ago then mails with "hotmail" in the body
got classed as spam?
Best regards
Jesp
t will tell us much about the WHY.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
*Michael J Wise*
MicrosoftCorporation| Spam Analysis
"Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool
<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275>?
--
Best
/listinfo/mailop
--
Best regards
Jesper Sörtoft
Deliverability Specialist
Stormgatan 11, 211 20 Malmö
www.apsis.se
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 2019-07-18 21:06, Steven Champeon via mailop wrote:
Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Yeah, whatever. I've had rulesets that block webmail-injected 419/AFF
scams for over a decade and Google is among the few who I still get them
from because I can't tell if the IP is in West Africa thanks to this
i
We also have some IPs blacklisted with UCEprotect, and issues trying to
pinpoint what customers are causing it . We have been focusing on
reported IPs that are sending low volumes, but the problem is that there
is nothing sent from those IP's +/- 1 min for the reported timestamps
UCEprotect lis
Hi Michael,
do you know if this somehow has an impact on junk filtering? We are also
seeing these error, and we have customers who suddenly for no apparent
reason goes straight to junk. On day the mail goes to the inbox, the
next day (literally) the exact same mail goes to junk. SCL:0, and t
