Re: [mailop] looking for a good backchannel to share/lookup problem customers who are abusing ESPs

> On 20/07/17 16:14, Alexander Burch wrote: >> I was wondering if anyone had good suggestions for a backchannel or forum >> where we can post information about really bad spammers who have abused our >> platform and are likely "doing the rounds". These are usually really nasty >> affiliate rings t

Re: [mailop] Anyone have contacts at Orange (France)?

Michael, please contact me directly, offlist. We have contacts at Orange. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Attorney at Law / Legislative Consultant

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

> Constant Contact > > Why did you send spam to our DNS team attempting to sell your services? > > "Save 50% for 2 months" > > postmas...@texas.gov, > Bryan Bradsby Bryan - may I share this with the person at Constant Contact who is in charge of abuse issues? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorn

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

> Bryan, > > I work for Constant Contact and can look into this. Can you send a sample to > me offlist please? > > Tara Natanson Aah...nevermind my offer, I see that she is here. :-) Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-

Re: [mailop] mail.protection.outlook.de IPv6 broken

For whatever it's worth, every email in this thread was sent to the spam folder at Gmail, so presumably for content. Just in case anyone wants to know. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/Pr

Re: [mailop] Looks like GoDaddy is having email issues

Frank and Eric, may we share these with our GoDaddy contact? > > We're seeing multiple domains, multiple IPs, queued up with: > 421 p3plibsmtp02-14.prod.phx3.secureserver.net bizsmtp Temporarily > rejected. Reverse DNS for 96.31.0.x failed. IB108 > Where 'x' is 21,

[mailop] New Service Snowshoes for Customers through Sparkpost, Sendgrid, MailChimp Mandrill, SendMail, MailGun, MailJet, Amazon AWS, and more

I just became aware of a business that is taking advantage of the free services offered by MailChimp Mandrill, Sendmail, MailGun, MailJet, SparkPost, Sendgrid, and others to get their customers around filters, essentially creating a snowshoe scenario using the APIs of these ESPs. (See screensho

Re: [mailop] Looks like GoDaddy is having email issues

This has been passed on to GoDaddy. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Attorney at Law / Legislative Consultant Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act

Re: [mailop] SENDERSCORE

Weirdly, every single email in this particular thread ended up in Gmail's spam folder. Any good guesses as to why? Anne > > Hello, > > Has anyone else had experience with SenderScore RBL? > > I find one of our domains on their blacklist and have addressed the issue > that presumably got

Re: [mailop] Hotmail, green SNDS and junk folder placement

> > > I'm asking a few people to confirm my understanding and will get back to > y'all. > > Aloha, > Michael. > -- > Michael J Wise > Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis > "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." > Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? Can I just take a moment to say how ve

Re: [mailop] Hotmail and 4.5.1 4.7.500 Server Busy with some

> > Hehe, IMHO the one's that threaten legal action the loudest.. > > "Doth he protest too much?" > > Usually the ones that are going to take legal action, are the ones that do it > without threatening to do it.. Exactly. Spoken like one with knowledge. ;-) Fun fact: The iPhone dictatio

Re: [mailop] WHAT can be done about Ezoic and their spamming through Google?

> > On 23/12/2015 02:28, mikea wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:14:51AM -0700, Anne Mitchell wrote: >>> We are repeatedly being spammed by Ezoic, and we have reported them to >>> their providers (enom, scalr, Amazon and Google multiple times). >>> Just *what* can be done about a non-moving

Re: [mailop] Just because it is Friday.. Could and AT&T/SBC/Bellsouth contact me offlist?

This is part of the service we offer (intermediating between senders and receivers)... if each of you wants to contact me offlist I'll see if we can help. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.S

Re: [mailop] Proofpoint contact please

> Various organizations are reporting persistent issues delivering email to > various sites. Normal support channels aren't working. I would be grateful if > someone from Proofpoint could ping me off-list. I agree - we've had at least one ESP lose clients because the blackhole that is Proofp

Re: [mailop] Is BitBounce for real?

As to why, given where they are, and that they already have a seed round, and the current sexiness of cryptocurrency, I have to imagine that their endgame is to get VC funds, and then maybe a cushy exit. It's the Silicon Valley way. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, Suret

Re: [mailop] Issues delivering to Hotmail addresses

> > > And as a follow-up, eyeballs have been successfully attracted. Michael, you *totally* rock; you are *very* appreciated! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://ww

Re: [mailop] Heads Up

> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:00:17PM +0800, ComKal Networks wrote: >> You have been around long enough to know that a >> secured commercial entity simply means it will take >> longer for that their data to be leaked Vs a non secured >> commercial entity :) > > I have been running experiments

Re: [mailop] Anyone on this list from SpamCop?

> > Also URLs in mail headers, which is perhaps reasonable, except that ...many ESPs now put unsub URLs in the headers. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/President, Institute for Social

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Gmail ?

> > > In my experience with the banking industry, they think of their email as > something that their customers always want to read for sure. Unless you've > handled the "double opt-in" yourself, I would be skeptical about that. Look > for typoed email addresses as those are a telltale sign

[mailop] Email to rackspace.com bouncing?

We just tried sending email to three different (known to be live a few weeks ago) Rackspace addresses, and all 3 bounced as 'recipient unknown'. Either they just had a massive purge of employees, or their email is borked. Anybody have any insight into this? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at

[mailop] Anyone from iWeb around? (And generally feel free to block/list the below)

Is there anyone from iWeb here? And generally, this spammer - and his many domains - needs a lesson :-\ Anne > From: "Anne P. Mitchell Esq." > Subject: Spam and Violation of Law complaint > Date: April 13, 2018 at 12:39:26 PM MDT > To: ab...@iweb.com, Enom Domain Abus

Re: [mailop] Anyone from iWeb around? (And generally feel free to block/list the below)

of spams and the ISP ignored your report for > many months ? > > No? Then... > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. > wrote: >> Is there anyone from iWeb here? And generally, this spammer - and his many >> domains - needs a lesson :-\ >> >&

Re: [mailop] GDPR and WHOIS PRIVACY

> > Since GDPR has pushed for a public WHOIS to disappear (even though ICANN > seems to be resistant), how do those of you in the email world feel this will > affect those of us who believe in the best practice of having clients/users > turn off WHOIS Privacy on their domains? > > E.G we h

Re: [mailop] GDPR and WHOIS PRIVACY

> > > If we can't reliably figure out who owns a block, the speed of blocking will > increase, and the size of the blocks will likewise increase, and ... well ... > the False Positives will increase. Speaking of this sort of stuff, on another (very different) list that I'm on, someone ask

[mailop] Anyone from Chase or ZetaImpact/Delivery.net here (or have a contact there)?

Chase is in gross violation of even our laxer U.S. anti-spam law - specifically they have *no* unsubscribe in their marketing email (pretty shocking). Their ESP is ZetaImpact/Delivery.net. Would love to hear from someone, or be put in touch, before I escalate. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney

Re: [mailop] GDPR and SMTP in general

> On May 25, 2018, at 4:40 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > >>> But, how it interacts with email, it all seems to get very horrible. I >>> suspect the *intention* is OK, but I'm struggling with the actual >>> regulations. >>> >> Whilst this specific article (written by Andrew Cormack of Jisc UK) pert

Re: [mailop] Amazon contact

Melinda, if this is not (I have to emphasize that, *not*) an email delivery issue, but *is* some sort of network-to-network issue, I can probably put you in touch with someone. > > Hi > > Anyone from Amazon on the mailing list? Would you mind contacting me off > list? > > > Thanks > M

Re: [mailop] Contact from ATT/BELLSOUTH

Marc, if you want to hmu offlist and give me the details, we can pass them on to our AT&T contacts. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance GDPR Compliance Consultant GDPR Compliance Certification http://www.

Re: [mailop] Bitcoin password ransom email from user at outlook.com

Geoff, may I forward this to our contact at Microsoft? Dictated on my phone, apologies for any tupos. > On Jul 11, 2018, at 9:26 PM, Geoff Mulligan wrote: > > We received a password ransom email requesting payment via bitcoin from an > outlook.com user. > > Is there someone from outlook.com t

Re: [mailop] Problem with the new Microsoft's support form

> Anyone else not getting response from the outlook's support request form > (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/supportrequestform/8ad563e3-288e-2a61-8122-3ba03d6b8d75) > > We recently verify that this forward for a new page with a different form. > > However all request through this form don'

Re: [mailop] Gmail - Anybody out there from Gmail, willing to assist with strange reputation issue

> > Companies should not ask for an email address unless they take good care of > it and convince the recipient of that. That is how they should protect > themselves. (cough)GDPR(cough) Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and I

Re: [mailop] apple contact?

Dave, we have a contact at Apple, but can't share it - but if you want to forward me the questions offlist we can send them over and they may well contact you as a result. Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance G

[mailop] Monumetric - unabated spamming through Google / GTT

This spammer is spamming through the Gmail api, and GTT is the last identifiable hop to get to their google-hosted site. This is the 4th spam to this role account that we've received in the space of a week - we have now reported this spammer three times to Google, GTT and Sucuri (they are hosted

Re: [mailop] Any Century Link email admins lurking on the list?

We have someone at CenturyLink...can you give me a bit more for us to go on when reaching out to them? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant GDPR, CCPA (CA

Re: [mailop] O365 discarding mail after User-Agent change

> On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:48 AM, Bill Cole > wrote: > > On 31 Oct 2018, at 12:53, Steve Dodd wrote: > >> The two recipient orgs here are actually a local govt department, and a >> state-funded charity. Would be interesting to see what a lawyer made of >> their "right" to randomly drop mail fro

Re: [mailop] Godaddy Postmasters?

> are there any Godaddy postmasters on this list? If so could one contact me > offlist? We can put you in touch with someone...what is going on? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CC

Re: [mailop] Pet Peeve of the day, legalese signatures (was: Pet Peeve of the day, Bulk Notice Mailers from Do Not Reply.)

>>> This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged >>> information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright >>> protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or >>> reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written >>> au

Re: [mailop] Pet Peeve of the day, legalese signatures

> On Nov 29, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > > On 29/11/2018 03:36, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: > >> >>>>> This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged >>>>> information, therefore remains confidentia

Re: [mailop] GoDaddy TakeDown requests

Ryan, Send me the info and we'll get it in front of the right person. Anne > On Dec 6, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Ryan Harris via mailop wrote: > > Hello, > > I sent a takedown request to ab...@godaddy.com, also filled out an abuse form > on a domain they are hosting which is phishing/malware. No r

[mailop] Anybody know anybody at Target.com?

Target has a *serious* problem..as in... *no* unsubscribe option at all for the very generic marketing email I just received. And, they are doing their own mailing, from mail-target.com, so I can't even complain to their ESP. Anybody have a contact? Thanks in advance! Anne --- Anne P. Mitc

[mailop] Something VERY weird going on with BitBounce

We just sent out a mailing to a list of several thousand subscribers - we have *never* (at least for the past several years) had a user respond with a BitBounce auto-demand for the 5 cents. We sent out a mailing just a few days ago and there were no users using BitBounce. We *only* use COI so

[mailop] Campaign Monitor Spewing Their Own Spam Now

Campaign Monitor is now spamming on their own behalf..and our original abuse contact there is unresponsive - in fact abuse@ is unresponsive..maybe gone...anybody have any reason why anything coming from Campaign Monitor's space shouldn't be rejected on sight? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney a

Re: [mailop] Campaign Monitor Spewing Their Own Spam Now

Hello, Carissa, Generally we are used to dealing with an individual - upon receipt of the first spam from your Faye Nagpigkit to a role account (!), on January 8, I wrote to your abuse@ asking for Heather to contact me (this is how we have always worked with you guys in in the past). I never he

Re: [mailop] If you're from Cox - check your SPF records

David, may we share this with our Cox contact? Anne > On Jan 10, 2019, at 3:46 PM, David Carriger > wrote: > > If we have anyone from Cox on the list, I was doing some SPF lookups against > large mail providers and stumbled across this... > > "v=spf1 include:%{d}.7b.spf-protect.agari.com

Re: [mailop] If you're from Cox - check your SPF records

Cox has been notified and they are on it. :-) Happy Friday! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification http://www.SuretyMail.com/ Certified Sender DNSBL here: iadb.isipp.com Info here: https://www.isipp.com/email-accreditation/for-isps/ GDP

Re: [mailop] Contact at txt.att.net?

> On Jan 20, 2019, at 5:25 AM, Josiah Ritchie > wrote: > > We're trying to deal with what appears to be new rate limiting with domains > handled at txt.att.net. I'd really appreciate a contact who may be able to > help us get mail flowing again. > We may not be able to put you in touch di

Re: [mailop] Comcast Contact

> Is anyone from Comcast on this list or does anyone have a good contact for > email admins there? Looking to troubleshoot end users messages that are > being delivered to their MTAs but never arrive in the recipients’ mailboxes. > Rob, if you reply to me off-list (amitch...@isipp.com) wit

Re: [mailop] iCloud abuse

Daniel - please see email that I have sent you offlist. Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consulting http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Att

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Mandrill/Mailchimp here?

Paul, please pass the info to us offlist and we'll get it in front of the right person ASAP. Anne *Typed with 1.5 eyes as I'm recuperating from a torn retina, so apologies for any typos. > On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:47 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > > We've just received what I'm 99% sure is a phishing

[mailop] Webroot contact?

Is there anyone here from Webroot? All of the contacts I have are returning 'not found'. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/President, Ins

Re: [mailop] charter.net contact

Hi Marc, We can probably help you with that if you haven't already found a contact. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consulting http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http:/

Re: [mailop] Gmail Contact?

> On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:02 AM, Brandon Long via mailop > wrote: > > followed by "don't be too similar to the bad guys" THIS!!! ^^^ SO much this!! I would say that "trying to be 'clever' and 'fix' things themselves, making themselves look like bad guys in the process" is the #

[mailop] Contact at Sprint / Sprintpcs?

Does anybody have a contact at Sprint / Sprintpcs? Thank you! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law Schoo

Re: [mailop] AOL SCOMP messages

l. > 2) emphasize how easy it is to unsubscribe, also at the TOP of the email. With respect to #1, feel free to grab our (free) personalized whitelist instructions generator tool: http://www.isipp.com/free-tools/personalized-whitelist-instructions-generator/ Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/Pr

Re: [mailop] Bounces as a canary (was Re: AOL SCOMP messages)

c. etc. By the way, you do know to also check your mail logs for bounces, and to not just rely on bounce messages that are emailed back to the sender, right? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMai

Re: [mailop] AOL SCOMP messages

something for which they signed up. But...yeah, the CIC user is a big factor, and it's certainly not limited to AOL users. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = deliver

Re: [mailop] Need contact at verizon.com

Alexander, please contact me off-list and we'll see what we can do. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! http://www.SuretyMail.

Re: [mailop] Verizon contact

Brett, please contact me offlist, with details. I'm out of the office (sick) today, so I may not respond instantaneously, but I am checking in. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accr

Re: [mailop] Sourcing an email related quote

>> Recipient's budget to deal with your delivery problems: zero. That is reminiscent of a quote from John Levine, although I don't have it handy. It's also reminiscent of how we try to educate our certification customers. ;-) Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President I

Re: [mailop] Looking for an AT&T contact

Alexander - please drop me a note offlist. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Author: Section

Re: [mailop] Anyone from mailchimp here?

Robert, may I forward this to our Mailchimp contact? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Au

Re: [mailop] Anyone from mailchimp here?

> On Fri, 15 May 2015, at 15:35, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: >> Robert, may I forward this to our Mailchimp contact? > > Sure. Done. It's nearly 1am here, but when they aren't asleep, they're pretty responsive, in my experience. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.

[mailop] Need a contact at Facebook

Ultimate goal is to reach someone in legal at Facebook. I have an interesting infringement situation that they will want to jump on, but any contact will get me started on the path. Thank you! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditatio

Re: [mailop] SORBS help

>> It's always good to keep in mind that having your mail accepted somewhere >> is a privilege, not a right, and that recipient systems are free to >> cease extending that privilege in whole or in part at any time with or >> without notice and with or without reason. Moreover, Federal law *speci

Re: [mailop] SORBS help

> On Jan 7, 2017, at 11:33 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > > On 2017-01-07 01:05 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: >> Moreover, Federal law *specifically* grants that right to ISPs (refusing >> anybody's email for any, and indeed for no, reason). > > Where is thi

Re: [mailop] SORBS help

l being fair to the senders, and mindful of all the rocks and hard places. So, I just want to *thank you* for the above explanation and transparency. Thank you. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance http://www.Su

[mailop] Do we need a new list for reporting spam? (Was Re: Admin: This is not a place to report Spam. )

> A reminder that this is not the correct forum to report spam. This is not > even the correct forum to report that your previous complaints didn't work. > > There are other forums (I assume, let me know what they are and we'll list > them somewhere, or start your own) for this. > This bring

Re: [mailop] Do we need a new list for reporting spam? (Was Re: Admin: This is not a place to report Spam. )

>> On Apr 9, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> >> On Apr 9, 2017 13:07, "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." wrote: >> This brings up a good point...back in 'the day' folks would report spam on >> NANAE; is there a managed, moderated mailing l

Re: [mailop] Do we need a new list for reporting spam? (Was Re: Admin: This is not a place to report Spam. )

> Hi Anne, > >> This brings up a good point...back in 'the day' folks would >> report spam on NANAE; is there a managed, moderated >> mailing list to report spam, that has the main ESPs and such >> on it? > > I cant see the need for one, abuse@ (or whatever is listed in > whois) works fine mos

Re: [mailop] Do we need a new list for reporting spam? (Was Re: Admin: This is not a place to report Spam. )

> Posting the spam itself on forums is pretty much pointless. And to be clear, nobody was suggesting that (and if my original note seemed to suggest that, I apologize). > > On the other hand, having a forum where you can ask "Are the guys who > are supposed to be dealing with ab...@robot-peng

[mailop] New Trusted Reporters list (was Re: Do we need a new list for reporting spam?)

Sorry for the delays in responding to this, I was out of town last week. Let me clarify - I was not suggesting a list for reporting spam *to abuse desks*. I was not suggesting a list where one could say "so and so is spamming me from $ISP" and someone from $ISP would look into it (although of

[mailop] Senders Please Read Re: New Trusted Reporters list

Wow...we have received *so* many requests from senders who are lurking on this list (and in fact have never posted, at least in the several years' worth of archives that we have). So, a couple of things: 1. It's interesting to note how many senders are lurking here, many of whom even I have n

Re: [mailop] Senders Please Read Re: New Trusted Reporters list

> Just so I understand this... You are suggesting a list, for people to post > spam samples they received, but don't care to have actual senders of > marketing mail, or their overlords (ESPs) on the list to try and remediate > the problems people are reporting. Nope. We now *have* a list,

Re: [mailop] DigitalOcean calling for social media s* storm? (Re: Why is it so hard to have takedown's performed..)

> I Twittered to @digitalocean about the lack of responsiveness from their > abuse desk. > > They promptly replied via Twitter: > > "We apologise for the trouble. Our security & operation team is already > looking into it." > > As I still had a case open with them, I appended your nice list of >

[mailop] DigitalOcean responds to DMCA takedown (was re: DigitalOcean calling for social media s* storm? (Re: Why is it so hard to have takedown's performed..))

Just an update on our own issue - which was that DigitalOcean is hosting privacy-formula.com, which is doing wholesale rip-off of content from places like Sophos, Washington Times, Medium, NY Times, etc... and one of our publications (The Internet Patrol). They are basically grabbing the RSS f

[mailop] About to blacklist Marketo - has anyone received non-spam from them?

I'm pretty much giving up on Marketo - and about to BL them and also recommend to others that they do so - as I have *never* received anything other than spam from them, and while they may still have a few good people there, it doesn't seem to make a blind bit of difference overall. Does anyone

Re: [mailop] AT&T Abuse contact - messages being ignored

> On Jul 10, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Scott Mutter via mailop > wrote: > > I mean... seriously... how are we suppose to combat any type of abuse or > blacklisting when the methods of disputing those issues are ignored? It's unclear from the above whether you are trying to *report abuse*, or *tryi

Re: [mailop] Crazy Sender-score value of 0 instead of 96-98

Relatedly, do we have any idea what is going to happen with SenderScore now that they have been acquired by Validity, and 200 RP employees have been laid off? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Dean of Cybersecurity & Cyberlaw, Linc

Re: [mailop] How to identify source of email sent via Google?

> On Jul 19, 2019, at 12:30 AM, Angelo Giuffrida via mailop > wrote: > > I find it rich that Michael is in here throwing stones... can't exactly throw > stones when you live in a glass house there big Mikey! I find it rich that you would disparage Michael like this, especially when, to the

[mailop] Fwd: More Visitors & More Sales

Here ya go ;-) > Sujata Sain > RE: More Visitors & More Sales > > X-Incomingheadercount: ⁨39⁩ > X-Ms-Exchange-Crosstenant-Originalarrivaltime: ⁨23 Jul 2019 05:28:27.5595 > (UTC)⁩ > X-Originatororg: ⁨outlook.com⁩ > X-Ms-Exchange-Transport-Crosstenantheadersstamped: ⁨PU1APC01HT241⁩ > X-Virus-Sca

Re: [mailop] More Visitors & More Sales

Oh..my..god...I am so sorry! I had deleted that entry, and how the heck it got in there again to default to mailop...I have no idea..going to strangle my Mac now... Anne..with a very red face. :-( > On Jul 23, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. > wrote: > > Here ya go ;-)

[mailop] Lawsuit to watch: Tulsi v. Google

While at first blush the big news about this lawsuit is that Google is being sued for suppressing presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard's campaign's ads, there is also a piece of the lawsuit where they are suing Google because (they claim) a disproportionate number of her campaign's email was bei

Re: [mailop] Lawsuit to watch: Tulsi v. Google

> Also, doesn't CAN-SPAM only apply to senders? No, there is a little-known (apparently) clause in CAN-SPAM that specifically states that ISPs can make any delivery decision that they want to, for any reason or no reason whatsoever. It’s nearly (but not quite) the codification of “their server

[mailop] Issue with Mailop 'From' header

Something has changed in the past several weeks so that email from Mailop now comes: From: To: mailop@mailop.org Whereas before the change the email would come: From: Anne Mitchell To: mailop@mailop.org ..making triage, etc., of reading Mailop mail more onerous now, as one has to actually o

Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Return Path / Sender Score

> Spam being unsolicited broadcast email, I would say that if you agree to > receive it, it cannot be spam. This definition has held up well over the > twenty-five years I've been involved in the industry. Indeed, and it was formalized in item (2) in the Vixie/Mitchell defintion of spam, which

Re: [mailop] mailop Digest, Vol 142, Issue 35

> On Aug 24, 2019, at 7:03 PM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote: > > Wait. There was spam before Anne Mitchell defined it for the rest of us? > Actually it was Paul Vixie who defined it - then we worked together to refine the wording and put it up on the MAPS website. Anne --- Anne P. Mitchel

Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: Return Path / Sender Score

> On Sep 6, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Ewald Kessler | Webpower via mailop > wrote: > > Not short, but certainly sweet: > > I don't care what method people devise to make sure that people don't get > added to a mailing list without their consent, so long as it actually works. > I don't care if they

Re: [mailop] One click unsubscribe in mailing list messages

: https://www.isipp.com/a-one-step-unsubscribe-is-required-by-federal-law/ Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy (ISIPP) Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law) Creator of the t

Re: [mailop] One click unsubscribe in mailing list messages

to. Where I think that it's going to get interesting is when senders start removing the visible, in the body, unsub link that people are used to looking for, and relying _only_ on the header-embedded unsub. And that is more likely from where the litigation will come. Anne --- Anne P. Mitch

Re: [mailop] One click unsubscribe in mailing list messages

ght in on a case that turned on deciding what this language meant, I could argue either side, and convincingly so, I believe. Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy (ISIPP) Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the F

Re: [mailop] Anyone from Microsoft?

ul. Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Internet Law & Policy Attorney CEO ISIPP SuretyMail Sender Certification Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law) Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Dean Emeritus,

Re: [mailop] Ongoing issue with sending emails to Gmail / Google hosted domains from our MS 365 Tenant

volumes of above 1million at least 3x a week. (So yeah, it could be the Microsoft domain about which Gmail is complaining but that somehow seems even less likely than the other theory.) Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Internet Law & Policy Attorney CEO Get to the Inbox by SuretyMail A

[mailop] Information About the Issue with Delivering to Gmail from Microsoft

so that the email you send goes to the inbox, not the junk folder. Learn more at gettotheinbox.com Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney CEO Get to the Inbox by ISIPP SuretyMail Creator of the term 'deliverability' and co-founder of the deliverability industry

Re: [mailop] salesforce phishing emails

d, which I'm > inclined to believe. I've also always found abuse@ to be responsive there, and it's peopled by a real person, who gives real responses (at least that was the case as recently as 12/21/23. Anne --- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Internet Law & Policy Attorney CEO

Re: [mailop] salesforce phishing emails

> On Jun 12, 2024, at 11:40 PM, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop > wrote: > > Am 12.06.24 um 18:04 schrieb Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop: >> >> >> I've also always found abuse@ to be responsive there, and it's peopled by a >> real person, w

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: AT&T Block

d law in the U.S. and has been for more than 20 years. In fact "my server, my rules" is enshrined in our Federal law (of course not so succinctly or in nearly as straightforward a manner). Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney Legislative Advisor CEO Instit

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: AT&T Block

it right as a result of that. So, in fact, they were the only lawsuit that didn't go to trial. Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney Legislative Advisor CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: AT&T Block

roper authentication, spam complaints, or something else). What is the nature of the email which was being sent through those IP addresses? Instead of grumbling, if you can give us information, perhaps someone here can help you. Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney Leg

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: AT&T Block

> On Jul 9, 2024, at 2:11 PM, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: > > On 2024-07-09 at 13:53:47 UTC-0400 (Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:53:47 -0600) > Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop > is rumored to have said: > >> Receivers don't block email from new IPs by default; they bl

Re: [mailop] How should we respond in this situation

the request. Definitely talk with legal counsel. Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney Legislative Advisor CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law) Author: The Email Deliverability Hand

  1   2   >