Re: [mailop] Outlook JMRP IP Feedback not available

On 26/06/2024 19:25, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote: > What would cause an IP address to not show as being available for Outlook's > JMRP? IP addresses can only be a member of one feed. You should be able to see all JMRP feeds that directly contain an IP address you have access to, even if you can'

Re: [mailop] Outlook JMRP IP Feedback not available

> On 27 Jun 2024, at 03:34, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:15 PM Al Iverson > wrote: >> Try jumping directly to the appropriate "view data" page in SNDS for this IP. >> How? Use my little jumper widget here: >> https://www.wombatmai

Re: [mailop] Set profile picture from server side for Outlook (Standalone client)

Dnia 26.06.2024 o godz. 20:17:32 Al Iverson via mailop pisze: > I'm not aware of any way to do this. > > Microsoft used to have a method to add sender logos for hosted email > service domains. This was called Brand Cards. It's been dead for a few > years, though. The only case I saw Outlook displ

Re: [mailop] [E] Yahoo/AOL Blocking

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:31 AM Marcel Becker via mailop wrote: > I assume you have already reached out to the official Yahoo postmaster > support team via the link conveniently provided in the SMTP response? > > No response on that ticket in over 24 hours. And the IP address is still blocked.

Re: [mailop] Outlook JMRP IP Feedback not available

Indeed, SNDS dashboard results will be reactive based on seeing mail pass through their systems. No mail = no data. -Al On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 9:38 PM Scott Mutter via mailop wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:15 PM Al Iverson > wrote: > >> Try jumping directly to the appropriate "view data"

[mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

Been debugging an email forwarding problem, it's basically that the forwarder doesn't use SRS or ARC That would be an SPF fail, but the sender domains are ~all Why the hard bounce? * Sender address: ~all * The forwarded address has -all * Receiving server rejecting with notice about sender

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:27:53 -0400 schrieb "Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop" : > Been debugging an email forwarding problem, it's basically that the > forwarder doesn't use SRS or ARC So I assume the MAIL FROM: is u...@original.domain.example.org > That would be an SPF fail, but the sender domains

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop wrote: Been debugging an email forwarding problem, it's basically that the forwarder doesn't use SRS or ARC That would be an SPF fail, but the sender domains are ~all Why the hard bounce? * Sender address: ~all * The forwarded address has -all

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

That would be an SPF fail, but the sender domains are ~all Why the hard bounce? It's entirely up to the receiver what they do with a message. If they've decided to hard fail messages with soft SPF fails, that's their choice... ___ mailop mailing

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

On 2024/06/27 17:46, Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:27:53 -0400 > schrieb "Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop" : > > > Why the hard bounce? > > Some postmasters decide not to accept them. IIRC Google had that > behavior in some cases in the past. > I assume this is the case here.

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

Paul Smith via mailop skrev den 2024-06-27 18:17: That would be an SPF fail, but the sender domains are ~all Why the hard bounce? It's entirely up to the receiver what they do with a message. If they've decided to hard fail messages with soft SPF fails, that's their choice... permfails is n

[mailop] Large Volume of Emails in Violation of Acceptable Use Policies

Hello List, I'm reaching out in hopes of connecting with Gmail, Yahoo, Microsoft, Comcast, iCloud and any others that may believe they are affected. Some time ago, someone developed an app/automation to send AI generated emails to my customer. Their intent is to campaign advocacy regarding worl

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

Am 27.06.2024 um 19:16:51 Uhr schrieb Benny Pedersen via mailop: > Paul Smith via mailop skrev den 2024-06-27 18:17: > >> That would be an SPF fail, but the sender > >> domains are ~all > >> > >> Why the hard bounce? > > > > It's entirely up to the receiver what they do with a message. > > >

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

Hello, I'm the systems administrator working with the mailsystem in question, and wanted to add some details to this. We are on the receiving end of the email transaction, I've checked and tested our spf configuration, using postfix-policyd-spf-python, and for all my tests I see us properly

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 14:50 -0400, Ted Smith via mailop wrote: > That conbined with the hard fail indicated could account for the > rejection of the message, except that I don't understand why the SPF > check would be done for the helo hostname of the forwarding server, > and why that result would

[mailop] Request: UTF-8 email address?

Does anyone here have a UTF-8 email address you'd let me send some test messages to? Possibly wouldn't be for a few months, but I'd let you know in advance. I'd just be looking for you to let me know if you receive them properly. Contact off-list preferred. Thanks! -- *Christine Borgia* Staff De

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

Slightly 'off-thread' but want to point out that the idea of 'soft-fail' is not universal.. Personally, we believe that if someone advertises a HARD FAIL, it should be rejected in the SMTP transaction.. And SOFT FAIL, if from a source that especially vulnerable to forgeries, and/or targeted in

Re: [mailop] Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

At least in the past, some other types of auth failures at MS would result in an SPF specific bounce message, including DKIM issues when they broke signatures and tried to forward. I have no idea if this is still the case. The other thing you ask, if there is no sender (ie a bounce from <>), you

[mailop] Fwd: Why an SPF hard bounce on ~all ?

> Hey, > Thanks for the reply > > On 2024-06-27 16:43, Brandon Long wrote: > > > > > At least in the past, some other types of auth failures at MS would result > > in an SPF specific bounce message, including DKIM issues when they broke > > signatures and tried to forward.

[mailop] How to respond to a subscription attack

Hi, Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders that participated in a mass subscription bomb attack? I've got a user that received almost 1k subscription / welcome / confirmation messages over a period of about 30 minutes before I disabled the account (hopefully tempor

Re: [mailop] How to respond to a subscription attack

Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:43:11 -0500 schrieb Grant Taylor via mailop : > Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders > that participated in a mass subscription bomb attack? Of course. They must be aware of that to implement countermeasures. Some mailing list software has no r

Re: [mailop] How to respond to a subscription attack

In message <484dfe5a-71e7-4851-8de0-fe35342cff97@spamtrap.tnetconsulting .net>, Grant Taylor via mailop writes >Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders that >participated in a mass subscription bomb attack? this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy, or more of

Re: [mailop] Request: UTF-8 email address?

Hi Christine, hi list, On 27.06.24 21:55, Christine Borgia via mailop wrote: Does anyone here have a UTF-8 email address you'd let me send some test messages to? Possibly wouldn't be for a few months, but I'd let you know in advance. I'd just be looking for you to let me know if you receive th

Re: [mailop] How to respond to a subscription attack

On 6/27/24 20:35, Richard Clayton via mailop wrote: this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy, or more often to hide some other message (about an unusual login, or money (or domain!) transfer) ACK I didn't want to open a new thread with "bomb" in it. some simple advice to a victim

Re: [mailop] How to respond to a subscription attack

Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 02:35:16 +0100 schrieb Richard Clayton via mailop : > this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy, And also to attack other services, either by targeting the mailbox itself (filling it to avoid receiving further mails) or their MX with many, many messages. Often, many

Re: [mailop] Request: UTF-8 email address?

Christine Borgia via mailop skrev den 2024-06-27 21:55: Does anyone here have a UTF-8 email address you'd let me send some test messages to? so you know any dns servers that support utf-8 ? dns servers that set the glue record must support utf-8, not just idn, what will happend if both idn an