Re: [mailop] Authentication Bounces by Gmail

On 21.09.2023 at 00:30 John Levine wrote: > It appears that Gellner, Oliver via mailop said: >>> Yes, I'm sure it does. >>> Using simple/simple canonicalization is not for people who want robust DKIM >>> signatures. >> >>The relaxed canonicalization of DKIM would fix this particular issue, >>but

Re: [mailop] Authentication Bounces by Gmail

Dňa 21. 9. o 9:27 Gellner, Oliver via mailop napísal(a): The bugs don't have to be security related, they just lead to wrongly computed DKIM signatures, because some implementations applied the steps defined in the RFC for the relaxed canonicalization in a wrong way or wrong order or whatever.

[mailop] Is anyone from Bigpond team could help for the bounce issue?

Hello! We are facing the Bigpond bounce issue which related to the envelop-from domain. 550 5.7.1 *** Sender domain rejected. IB302 I tried to contact Bigpond team by sending to their postmaster address (postmas...@bigpond.com) and Tmail-PostMaster address (tm-po

Re: [mailop] Is anyone from Bigpond team could help for the bounce issue?

Hi Teddy,I’ll contact you off list.Cheers,Brad Get Outlook for iOS  From: mailop on behalf of Teddy Choi via mailop Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 7:22 pmTo: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] Is anyone from Bigpond team could help for the bounce issue?

[mailop] Anyone from hostedemail.com able to help a bounce issue?

Hi, We have a dedicated IP client getting near 100% bounce rate to domains covered by hostedemail.com. The bounces are all... * bad connection Is anyone from hostedemail.com able to help look at the issue? Thanks, Dan ___ mailop mailing list ma

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

How long should I have to wait for a response? I haven't heard anything back and icloud is still rejecting the message due to local policy. On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 9:07 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > I will have the team check and reply to you > > > > *From: *Scott Mutter > *Date: *Tuesday

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

Can you resend your message to postmaster with a recent sample of the logs? Bcc me at s...@apple.com so I can follow up with the team. From: mailop on behalf of Scott Mutter via mailop Date: Thursday, 21 September 2023 at 8:00 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mail

Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

Just saw this thread; I published this earlier today and we're likely going to discuss it at M3AAWG: https://abusix.com/feedback-loops/ TLDR; Abusix is willing to take this on and provide it as a free service from any mailbox provider that wishes to participate, but we'll do it based on the Indep

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

Message sent again - today, 2023-09-21 11:51AM CDT. Subject of the message is - 209.236.124.55 IP Blacklisted I sent the message to icloudad...@apple.com and CC'd s...@apple.com On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:46 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Can you resend your message to postmaster with a rec

Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

Hi Steve, That is awesome news! Tracey Crawford Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 17:05:23 +0100 > From: Steve Freegard > To: Support 3Hound > Cc: mailop@mailop.org > Subject: Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF) > Message-ID: > fperqryufwzrd7jdmz...@mail.gmail.com> >

[mailop] Proofpoint Contact

Does anyone have proofpoint contact info? I have requested to have an ip delisted from one of their lists and haven't heard anything back and the ip is still being blocked.   Thanks, Troy       ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mail

Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

I think the first question anyone will ask is "How do we know that Abusix won't eventually become Validity 2: the Abusix Remix"? I do like the idea of pushing the RFC, but if you're in the middle many of those MBPs will likely defer to a new middle-man to handle the implementation, and we're bac

Re: [mailop] Proofpoint Contact

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:45 PM Troy via mailop wrote: > Does anyone have proofpoint contact info? I have requested to have an ip > delisted from one of their lists and haven't heard anything back and the ip > is still being blocked. > > Thanks, > Troy > Sent a private reply to Troy. Thanks,

Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

Hi Mike, Aside from stating categorically that we're not interested in monetizing the reports like Validity are doing, the only other thing I can suggest is that you look at the history of what we've done in the past. We've provided the Abuse ContactDB as a free service for well over 10 years (u

Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy

Ok we will check --srs From: mailop on behalf of Scott Mutter via mailop Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:23:15 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Apple/icloud blocking - Message rejected due to local policy Message sent again - today, 2023-

Re: [mailop] New Validity policy for paid FBL (ARF)

I would like to believe that the solution offered by Abusix is a drop-in replacement. Adding the CFBL-Address header is not too difficult for most senders. But most sender systems rely on ARF reports, with the rfc822 attachment. Not XARF, with the json attachment. So there’s two standards to pu