Re: [mailop] A proposal for automated management of mail sending limits

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to read and give feedback. On 13/11/2017 18:58, Steve Atkins wrote: If the ISP were to publish the constraints that were applicable to SMTP from strangers they'd often be low enough that many senders wouldn't be able to comply with them while still delive

Re: [mailop] A proposal for automated management of mail sending limits

Hi Ken, The part after the snippet, is where I explain why I said that. Only in recent years has PowerMTA 4.5 added some more granular options, maybe after me complaining about it. It used to be per (set of) domains only (and the added routing). I looked at the 4.5 features and I still presume th

[mailop] Random question about complaints

Hi there awesome email community! I wanted to do some due diligence on a question we had come in from a customer so figured asking the community for their thoughts would be a good start. Basically, we received an ARF report from an ISP so we take that as a recipient complaining against a message

Re: [mailop] Random question about complaints

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 11:56 -0600, Nick Schafer wrote: > My question is, is there anything that could inadvertently trigger a spam > complaint for a recipient without their knowing? My hunch is some sort of > mailbox add on or something to that extent but wanted to hear others > thoughts. > > Of c

[mailop] "Temporary System Problem" from Gmail?

Greetings! Is anyone else seeing "421 4.7.0 Temporary System Problem. Try again later (MU). r9si1981163qtf.177 - gsmtp" from our friends at Google?  Thanks! Allen K___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

Re: [mailop] Random question about complaints

Thanks all! Very helpful and inline with what I was thinking! Nick Schafer Technical Account Manager, Mailgun Add me on LinkedIn On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Ken O'Driscoll wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 11:

Re: [mailop] Timeouts on "." sending to nic.ru

On 11/14/2017 06:03 PM, Mark Milhollan wrote: satellite can be terrible and links into disaster areas can be worse, not even counting personal or overloaded servers Why are obvious problem links significantly influencing current standards? If I were to stand up a link across such a hostile con

Re: [mailop] DHL.com email admin contact?

I'm not actually seeing how this is DHL's fault. DMARC requires either DKIM *or* SPF to pass, if you're misconfigured such that you're breaking SPF that would seem to be your issue more than DHL's. In an ideal world, senders would aim to pass both DKIM and SPF, but if you're intentionally breaking