I’m not assuming anything. I know their mail is read and responded to.
Laura
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 24, 2021, at 6:24 PM, Jay Hennigan via mailop
> wrote:
>
> On 1/22/21 06:38, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
>
>> But forwarding an abuse address that is somewhat expected to rece
On 1/22/21 06:38, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
But forwarding an abuse address that is somewhat expected to receive
problematic content to a service that tries to keep
such content out of their users' mailboxes doesn't really look very
professional, and even if it isn't technically
Sen
One year anniversary of phishing from SendGrid/Twilio...
And the problem is SO easy to fix
On 2021-01-22 6:08 a.m., Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
Well I'm not complaining about the spam from them - it's a steady flow, nothing
new.
But it looks like they have filters on their abuse bo
Dnia 22.01.2021 o godz. 14:48:03 Gregory Heytings via mailop pisze:
>
> Actually Sendgrid uses a double filtering: the first line of the
> error report you got ("The original message was received at Fri, 22
> Jan 2021 05:45:50 -0800 from m0099904.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]") means
> that the mail has b
Dnia 22.01.2021 o godz. 15:08:13 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop pisze:
>- Transcript of session follows -
> ... while talking to aspmx.l.google.com.:
> >>> DATA
> <<< 552-5.7.0 This message was blocked because its content presents a
> potential
> <<< 552-5.7.0 security issue. Please vis
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 14:38, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Am 22.01.21 um 15:22 schrieb Andrew C Aitchison via mailop:
>>
>> Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ?
>> Looks to me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and
>> it was *gmail* that objected
Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ? Looks to
me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and it was *gmail* that
objected to the content ...
Or am I misunderstanding something ?
No, of course you're right.
But forwarding an abuse address that is somewhat expecte
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 14:08, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Well I'm not complaining about the spam from them - it's a steady flow,
> nothing new.
>
> But it looks like they have filters on their abuse box now to reduce the
> amount of abuse reports:
>
> The original message was
Am 22.01.21 um 15:22 schrieb Andrew C Aitchison via mailop:
>
> Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ?
> Looks to me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and
> it was *gmail* that objected to the content ...
>
> Or am I misunderstanding something ?
No, of course you'r
Are you sure that it was Sendgrid that blocked the message ?
Looks to me as if ab...@sendgrid.com is hosted at gmail and
it was *gmail* that objected to the content ...
Or am I misunderstanding something ?
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
Well I'm not complaining abou
Well I'm not complaining about the spam from them - it's a steady flow, nothing
new.
But it looks like they have filters on their abuse box now to reduce the amount
of abuse reports:
The original message was received at Fri, 22 Jan 2021 05:45:50 -0800
from m0099904.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
