Re: [mailop] Super dumb gmail request ...

> On 8 Sep 2024, at 9:28 AM, Ángel via mailop wrote: > > On 2024-09-01 at 10:45 +0300, Atro Tossavainen wrote: >>> The flaw for me is that TOTP involves using phone apps I don't know >>> the provenance of, >> >> https://github.com/freeotp >> >> is much lighterweight than Microsoft or Google A

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: Super dumb gmail request ...

For me.. the only reason for logging in to Google was to download Syngic and Torque Pro…. The two apps on my remote dashboard. Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ If we don't find a way out of this soon, I'm gonna lose it. Lose it... It means go crazy, nuts, insane, bonzo, no longer in posses

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: Super dumb gmail request ...

an normal android phone without a sim as Google should send the 2fa to that as well as sms ?ColinOn Tue, 27 Aug 2024, 17:39 Michelle Sullivan via mailop, <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:You make valid and invalid points…. The trouble is I suspect wires are crossed.  Unless I also got the wrong end

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: Super dumb gmail request ...

on't expect support, why would you do *anything* even remotely important or rely on this free and unsupported service you are using?-AOn Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:43 AM Michelle Sullivan via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:You assume wrongly.I gave up 5 years ago…. I have not seen an

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: Super dumb gmail request ...

of a Happy Meal, wacko!On 27 Aug 2024, at 23:36, Marcel Becker via mailop wrote:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:03 AM Michelle Sullivan via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:My current theory is Google accounts are the latest in a long line of abandonwareit seems to be run by armatures and marketing pe

Re: [mailop] Super dumb gmail request ...

My current theory is Google accounts are the latest in a long line of abandonware…they “perfected it” so got rid of development and support and don’t care to fix any glaring issues…. It will only be addressed when it impacts the bottom line when it will be terminated or fixed…. Just like the lit

Re: [mailop] Super dumb gmail request ...

Good luck… I’ve had the same issue for the last 7 years. Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ If we don't find a way out of this soon, I'm gonna lose it. Lose it... It means go crazy, nuts, insane, bonzo, no longer in possession of ones faculties, three fries short of a Happy Meal, wacko! > O

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Re: SORBS Closing.

ghting spam and improving >> email security. Your dedication and hard work have helped countless people >> and set high standards in our field. >> I am saddened to hear that Proofpoint is discontinuing SORBS. Your >> contributions have been invaluable, and you've made th

[mailop] SORBS Closing.

For those that haven't heard.  Proofpoint is retiring SORBS effective immediately(ish). Zones will be emptied shortly and within a few weeks the SORBS domain will be parked on dedicated "decommissioning" servers. I am being made redundant as part of the shutdown and my last day will be 30th

Re: [mailop] Do we need Spam folders?

Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote: On 14 Oct 2019, at 9:29, Chris Wedgwood via mailop wrote: as things stand today, i think we do technology has gotten very good but it's not perfect; sometimes spam isn't detected, and sometimes real messages are detected as spam I would rather have

Re: [mailop] Google and the Message-Id Header

Aaron C. de Bruyn via mailop wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Bill Cole via mailop > wrote: Not exactly garbage: if it exists, it needs a '@' and the legal content is slightly less permissive than the 'addr-spec' definition (i.e. email addresses

Re: [mailop] Paging Proofpoint - possible issue with SSL cert for SORBS website

Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote: As per a discussion on a emailgeeks today, it seems that Firefox is throwing up a CA not trusted security alert for visitors to https:// www.secure.sorbs.net I can reproduce on Firefox but not Chrome. A cursory glance shows the server doesn't appear to offer int

Re: [mailop] Paging Proofpoint - possible issue with SSL cert for SORBS website

Michael Wise via mailop wrote: Edge takes me to the site, but ... redirects me from https to http, with no overt indication of anything wrong until I click the (i), and then: “ Be careful here “ your conenction to this website isn’t “ encrypted. This makes it easier for someone “ to steal