hat. Check the box, so you can see when you’re breaking
your local data protection legislation! On the positive side, they do usually
now produce syntactically correct "To:" headers.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
_
nd yours has this From header:
From: Renaud Allard via mailop
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
s up the MS records
> of the sender's domain.
>
> It's that simple and can be bolted into existing infrastructure. You can read
> the whole patent at www.ipo.gov.uk reference GB2449653.
>
> Regards
> Dave Wain
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michel
__________
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
> j...@baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
them actionable. A lot of our job as an ESP is taking the
> technical and making it understandable to someone who doesn't have the
> training and background on RFCs and "proper" technical jargon. I've spent
> the last 18 years or so going over NDRs and DSNs and some
_________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
hey are ugly
> and hard to find the relevant information in them...
>
>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
t one. And I will notice.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ium and large mail providers that tend to fix things
quickly when they do go wrong. I think Exim has a default first warning after
24 hours.
But really, that’s not the responsibility of the recipient’s mail provider,
it’s the responsibility of the sender’s mail provider.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmas
not much difference either, except that 4xx
will result in more log entries that might be easier to spot. But, if you 4xx
then there is also my growing mail queue. And I won’t ignore that, because it
can impact on our MTA performance eventually.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, Un
also providing the DNS service. They
could require it, but at the risk of losing business. I guess that’s why Google
don’t require it (unless that’s changed).
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing
ackets in the Received headers.
Return-Path: <jqd@d1.example>
Received: from \[10.10.10.131] (w-x-y-z.dsl.static.isp.com \[w.x.y.z])
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
aven’t published a request for emails, then this clause isn’t
relevant. They’re spamming you.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
at it’s really hard for a mailing list system to tell the difference.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
domain. And probably a different IP
address, too.
Of course that makes it more likely that your own email is delivered, but less
likely that the forwarded email is delivered: since it won’t benefit from any
positive reputation that your own email has.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of
quite happy to whitelist any *.ac.uk domain for email that (a) gets an SPF
pass, and (b) has no attachments, and (c) some other stuff.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> On 5 Sep 2015, at 00:18, Brandon Long wrote:
>
> but my trolling through the online archive
"Trawling", surely ;^)
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mai
aw it mark up, as "High Confidence Spam", a message sent by Microsoft
to one of our Students.
Fortunately, I can switch this off!
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mail
.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fchilli.nosignal.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fmailop&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7c10750ba72ed941b63b0d08d27bdf7750%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=4Yd64gEpT1lxHL6pvZ%2bd4ePIOUKx0WMTWwwmIUessxQ%3d
> ___
ber of compromised wordpress installation (that uses php). However it
> is likely to have significant collateral damage.
Too true.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
bility Management
> MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP)
>
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] Namens Ian Eiloart
> Verzonden: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:22 PM
> Aan: mailop@mailop.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [mailop] Help. Why are my emails being marked as
t depends on the registrar. Which is why it might
be useful to have a reputation tool based on registrar. I think some already
look for recent registrations.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop
resource hungry than a sender-IP blacklist that blocks at the connection,
> before accepting the message.
>
> And I think this example provided in this thread... may very much be a
> leading indicator of what is to come if IPv6 is too quickly adopted.
>
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
POP/IMAP. it's not easy to tell the two without
> conducting quite a bit of testing.
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Su
> Lyle Giese
> LCR Computer Services, Inc.
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.or
25 matches
Mail list logo