Re: Docker container with MacPorts

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 14:32, Karan Sheth wrote: > > OK sorry, actually if we are just pushing Dockerfile with it's setup > documentation then I guess, there's no need of another repo. Yes, just Dockerfile (+ docs & tests), nothing in binary form. > So it could be something like > - Dockerfile a

MacPorts meeting 12.-16. October 2019

Dear MacPorts users & developers, We would like to organise an extended MacPorts hacking weekend in Trieste, Italy (or eventually Slovenia) from Saturday 12th of October to Wednesday, the 16th of October (arrivals on Friday evening or Saturday morning, departures on Wednesday afternoon). We will

[GSOC] Request for feedback for the new web application

Dear MacPorts users and developers, As most of you probably know already, we have 4 GSOC projects this year, one of them for a web application. The application written by Arjun made a decent progress so far and is available under a temporary URL: http://ec2-52-34-234-111.us-west-2.compute.ama

Re: [GSOC] Request for feedback for the new web application

-serious suggestion :) > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 4:24 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> Dear MacPorts users and developers, >> >> As most of you probably know already, we have 4 GSOC projects this >> year, one of them for a web application. >> >> The a

Setting up port builds on Azure using master branch of macports

Hi, Is anyone willing to set up one Azure build instance running macports master when building the ports? This could help us spot any potential issues with our code in the master branch in the future. Thank you, Mojca

Re: Setting up port builds on Azure using master branch of macports

> On Aug 1, 2019, at 9:55 AM, Blair Zajac wrote: > > By Azure, you’re referring to Microsoft’s Azure cloud offering? Azure pipelines. https://dev.azure.com/macports/macports-ports/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary > I’m wondering why not Google Compute Engine or AWS? Do they offer free resources

ports.macports.org & improvements

Hi, First of all a huge thank you to Clemens for having deployed https://ports.macports.org What would be nice to do next (probably not in the scope of GSOC) would be to increase the visibility of the website & get more people submitting statistics to make it more useful. (1) I promised this

Re: Retiring ports.php

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 15:27, Joshua Root wrote: > > I think ports.macports.org is already clearly superior to ports.php, so > we should change the Available Ports link to point there. However, we > should not remove ports.php so as not to break existing links. I think > we should make ports.php qu

Re: Retiring ports.php

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 16:16, Joshua Root wrote: > > On 2019-8-15 23:58 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 15:27, Joshua Root wrote: > >> > >> I think ports.macports.org is already clearly superior to ports.php, so > >> we should change

Re: pull request labels not being set

There was server outage. Mojca V ned., 18. avg. 2019 15:40 je oseba Christopher Jones < jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> napisala: > Hi All, > > Anyone know why GitHub no longer seems to be automatically setting labels > on new pull requests ? > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pulls > >

Re: New MacPorts ports database site

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 06:17, Joshua Root wrote: > > MacPorts' new ports database is live at . I would like to ask for an opinion. Please compare https://ports.macports.org/maintainer/github/ryandesign/ and https://ports.macports.org/ports/variant/universal I

Re: Preparing for 2.6.0 beta

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 05:45, Joshua Root wrote: > > I think we're pretty close to being ready to make a new stable branch > and tag a beta. Clemens is going to make one more change related to > Xcode checking; are there any other changes that really need to go in > before the beta? I would be gr

Re: Preparing for 2.6.0 beta

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 16:40, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Aug 24, 2019, at 08:55, Joshua Root wrote: > > On 2019-8-24 21:59 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > >> I would be grateful for addressing these: > >> > >> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50448 > &g

Re: Preparing for 2.6.0 beta

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 05:45, Joshua Root wrote: > > I think we're pretty close to being ready to make a new stable branch +1 :) > are there any other changes that really need to go in > before the beta? It would be kind of cool if we could display a message inviting users to submit statistics f

MacPorts Meeting 11th-16th October 2019

Dear MacPorters, We are happy to announce the 3rd international MacPorts meeting in Bohinj, Slovenia, from 11th to the 16th of October. (Meeting starts on Friday 11th with the dinner and ends on Wednesday after lunch.) Some basic information (to be completed): https://trac.macports.org/wiki/M

Re: [2.6.0-beta1 & LibcxxOnOlderSystems] stack fails to build

V sre., 4. sep. 2019 19:41 je oseba Bjarne D Mathiesen < macint...@mathiesen.info> napisala: > Joshua Root wrote: > > It looks like the compiler version check is just assuming that all > > compilers are gcc. It checks whether the version is at least 4.4, which > > is correct for gcc but not for cl

Re: [2.6.0-beta1 & LibcxxOnOlderSystems] stack fails to build

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 07:02, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 11:29, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > >> --with-gcc /usr/bin/gcc --allow-different-user > >> > >> I've also tried "port -t install stack +boot

Re: [2.6.0-beta1 & LibcxxOnOlderSystems] stack fails to build

On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 18:30, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > The new ghc infrastructure is broken on 10.6, and at a quick glance, it looks > like it starts building at 10.8, which is actually not too bad, and better > than I thought: > > I am not sure if i

Re: haskell 7 world

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 05:26, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > For users of the systems that can't run the current haskell 8.x software (at > present at least) I extracted what i believe is the bulk of the haskell 7.x > world and have it as a portfile overlay. > > It seems to work. pandoc installs and

Re: haskell 7 world -> moving to 8!

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 04:02, Ken Cunningham wrote: > On 2019-09-12, at 7:51 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > > Cool! > > Doesn't it work if you simply use this working ghc-bootstrap to build version > 8? > Or is Haskell too picky about what version of compiler

Re: latex is driving me batty -- ! Package fontspec Error: The font "DejaVu Sans" cannot be found.

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 01:32, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > I'm working on making a newer bootstrap version of ghc for SnowLeopard. > > The ghc 8.0.1 build finishes on 10.6.8, but it wants to build the PDF > documentation next, and texlive is erroring building the PDF. > > I know nothing about texlive

Re: Preparing for 2.6.0 beta

On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 03:38, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > > On Aug 24, 2019, at 23:20, Joshua Root wrote: > > > On 2019-8-25 03:00 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> Would it be possible to set up at least one builder with 10.6 running > >> MacPorts master, bui

Publishing links to non-encrypted websites for MacPorts downloads

Hi, I already mentioned this in the past, but I would like to repeat. When someone opens our homepage and wants to download MacPorts using Safari on, say, 10.6, the download link from GitHub doesn't work, and it's not trivial for users to find out the alternative link (http://distfiles.macports.or

Re: Publishing links to non-encrypted websites for MacPorts downloads

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 06:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > > On Sep 25, 2019, at 00:43, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > I already mentioned this in the past, but I would like to repeat. > > When someone opens our homepage and wants to download MacPorts using > > Safari

Re: Publishing links to non-encrypted websites for MacPorts downloads

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 07:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Sep 26, 2019, at 00:04, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > I ended up navigating to > >https://www.macports.org/install.php#installing > > which points to > > > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ba

Re: MacPorts For 10.15 Catalina

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 15:16, Shichao Dou wrote: > > I have a question to ask. I upgraded macOS to 10.15 Catalina Beta, but I > found that my MacPorts were not working. > > Want to know if there is a 10.15 Catalina update plan? When will it be > released? MacPorts should work on 10.15 if you com

Re: CMake Question

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 13:56, Mark Anderson wrote: > > So I have a CMake build that builds fine when I build it locally by hand > using ccmake, but as I try to turn it into a port file using the cmake > portgroup it fails. Does anyone know of a way to make ccmake spit out a > command line of wha

MacPorts Meeting 11th-16th October

Dear MacPorters, I would like to remind everyone that we are hosting the 3rd international meeting in Bohinj, Slovenia, from Friday 11th to Wednesday 16th of October. We'll be located in one of the nicest corners of the small country in central Europe, next to a glacier lake, surrounded by the Al

Re: *-graveyard ports retired

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 22:36, Joshua Root wrote: > > The p5-graveyard and py-graveyard ports have been removed as they no > longer serve a useful purpose. The buildbot skips replaced ports > automatically and thus doesn't generate the error reports that motivated > the creation of the graveyards.

Running buildbot-worker via launchctl

Hi, I tested buildbot-worker quite a bit, but maybe / apparently never with launchctl. The part that I don't quite understand is the following: * I've been running buildbot-slave 0.8 for a few years as a LaunchDeamon without any issues. * I now tried to upgrade the setup to buildbot-worker 2. I

Re: Running buildbot-worker via launchctl

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 03:30, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2019-10-2 11:19 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > sudo launchctl load -w > > /Library/LaunchDaemons/org.macports.buildworker.name.plist > > sudo launchctl start org.macports.buildworker.name > > > > But I keep gettin

Re: Setting system gcc when `port select --set gcc app-gcc*` is set

On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 19:50, Steven Smith wrote: > > I have a build failure on a system with `port select --set gcc mp-gcc9` set: > > :info:build > /opt/local/lib/gcc9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin18/9.2.0/include-fixed/ma > th.h:45:10: error: > :info:build fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or

Re: Running buildbot-worker via launchctl

e On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 17:01, Ken Cunningham wrote: > >> If I run it manually then it works as expected. > > Permissions issue, maybe with pid file? On the good side: the exact same configuration works on 10.6, so no clue why it doesn't on 10.13. But the folder is owned by buildbot, the pid file

Re: 10.15 builder

> On 17 Oct 2019, at 2:07 pm, Jack Howarth wrote: > >I noticed that https://build.macports.org/builders doesn't show a 10.15 > builder yet. Is there a schedule for when one will become available? I want to add that while analysing the CDN logs during the meeting (many thanks to @l2dy) we saw

Re: Index Broken on 10.5

On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 17:47, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote: > > Leopard Intel can run clang-7.0, and nothing newer at present. When I get > time, I will probably fix newer clangs. > > See > > > for my suggestions on ho

Exclusion of clang compilers for ppc

Hi, I fail to understand why this change was rejected / why we want to have clang on the default list of fallback compilers for PPC, rather than falling back to, say, gcc 6 or 7: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/5590 Mojca

Re: How to handle ports that are still broken because of the icu upgrade

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 03:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > icu was recently updated to a new major version. As a result its install_name > changed and anything that links with it needs to be rebuilt against the new > version. > > All ports that declare a dependency on icu already had their revisions

Re: How to handle ports that are still broken because of the icu upgrade

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 08:50, Joshua Root wrote: > > It's worth noting that the buildbot will never run into this problem > because it deactivates all installed ports between builds. Thanks a lot for the hint. Simply deactivating a bunch of compilers lead to successful compilation of libxml2. Mo

Re: Update with same filename but different URL path not picked up

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 21:53, Nils Breunese wrote: > > Hello, > > I’m the maintainer for AdoptOpenJDK in MacPorts and I'm trying to update the > OpenJ9-based OpenJDK subports. The URL's for the patched files have a > different path, but the filenames themselves are the same as the current one. >

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 17:54, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > In #57751 Michael and I have been talking about how keeping up the patchset > for qt4 would probably be easier with our own fork of it, with our patches > added on. > > QT4 has a github repo here and we could fork t

Re: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 on jsonnet submission

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 14:56, Steven Smith wrote: > > > Here’s the current not-working Portfile: > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/4a9cd2d6b34e6d48e22bfb608529e900f49f8dcb/devel/jsonnet/Portfile It builds perfectly fine for me (I built it with "sudo port -vt destroot"), it only f

Re: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 on jsonnet submission

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:53, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2019-11-24 01:35 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 14:56, Steven Smith wrote: > >> > >> > >> Here’s the current not-working Portfile: > >> > &g

Re: invalid certificate chain during port-fetch

On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 13:46, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 29.12.19 10:50, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Saturday December 28 2019 21:51:07 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > >> If I understood the patch correctly, it adds a fallback so that if > >> fetching via the curl library fails, then it tries fetching

Re: GSOC 2020

Dear Pierre, On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 18:47, Pierre Tardy wrote: > > Hi, > > GSOC 2020 has been announced, I haven't seen a thread yet on macports being > an org. We last discussed GSOC during the MacPorts meeting in Bohinj in October where we went through the ideas list. > We discussed the topic

GSOC mentor candidates

Hi, In order to apply for GSOC we need to publish an up-to-date idea list. MacPorts base make a significant (80%?) portion of the ideas list, so it would be nice if we could make it clear as soon as possible whether we have ideally two mentors willing to mentor base projects. Marcus, Sat, or any

Re: Packaging py-keyring

Dear David, On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 22:15, David Gilman wrote: > > I've been taking a stab at packaging poetry, a package manager for > Python. It has a dependency on the py-keyring port which is > maintained by reneeotten. > > The recent release of keyring v21 dropped support for Python before > v

Re: Migrating the guide to AsciiDoc

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 21:05, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 01:52:44AM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote: > > It has been almost two years... I would like to suggest we finally > > decide on a flag day on which I will do a final conversion of the > > DocBook to AsciiDoc and afte

Re: Update of port ehcache

On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 12:21, Jackson Isaac wrote: > > Is there a way non-members can assign themselves to a ticket ? Probably not, but there are other problems. Even if you assign a ticket to someone without the required permissions, that person still won't be able to do anything about it (ticket

Thank you for applying for GSOC @ MacPorts

Dear students, (I have put everyone in Bcc just in case, even though you are generally encouraged to use public communication.) I would like to thank each and every one of you for applying for the GSOC 2020. We have received 5 applications this year (I'm sorry for my own absence during this perio

Re: GSoC Proposal: Rewrite key parts of MacPorts in Python

Hi, On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 20:37, Joshua Root wrote: > > I would say it's OK for a GSoC project to be completely original and > never discussed before; the problem with this one is just the scope. You > would need to spend the entire summer (if not more) just doing design in > order to do it right,

GSOC 2020 & web app improvements

Dear Arjun, dear MacPorters, I would like to congratulate Arjun for being accepted into GSOC 2020 with the project of improving the ports.macports.org website. He has already been with us last year and made an awesome tool which he's about to improve this year. We are also enormously helpful to ha

Re: MacPorts webapp project updates

Dear Ryan, On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 21:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On May 17, 2020, at 11:48, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > > We also plan to add a caching engine so that exploring the webapp remains > > smooth even with the ever-growing port statistics data. This makes the need > > for a new host even mo

Call for designers for our ports website

Dear MacPorters, As part of a GSOC project Arjun has been working on great new features for our web application with information about ports. The application from last year has been deployed at https://ports.macports.org/ while the new testing site is temporarily located at http://macport

Re: randomly bumping things to require perl 5.30 vs 5.28 requires everyone to have both installed ...

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 21:34, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > We'd just need to either revbump everything that needs a rebuild when a new > minor perl version comes out (all the p5- ports to start) I would say that we happily accept a pull request that "just bumps" all dependents of perl5[.x]. Then all

Re: MacPorts webapp project updates

Hi, This is just a reminder that we would be extremely happy for further feedback about the new page. Arjun has added some pretty awesome new features. (Dark mode has been supported since yesterday etc.) It would be great to hear what you think while Arjun is still actively working on the projec

Re: MacPorts webapp project updates

Dear Frank, On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 00:27, Frank Schima wrote: > > Looks really good. I love dark mode! > > Some quick comments: > - Remove all commas as a separator. A space works great. What counts as "all"? For maintainers, variants? > - Sort the variants alphabetically and also ports that d

How should we handle subports / stub ports on the website?

Hi, Arjun recently added a new simplified port view, see for example: http://macports.silentfox.tech/port/py-numpy/ and it has been pointed out (rightly so) that we should not be encouraging users to run sudo port install py-numpy but rather make it clear that the port contains a number of

Re: MacPorts webapp project updates

On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 15:10, Craig Treleaven wrote: > On Jul 12, 2020, at 2:55 PM, Arjun Salyan wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> This is in continuation to my previous emails regarding updates about the >> webapp. The temporary version is deployed at http://macports.silentfox.tech/ > > Is the tempo

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 10:46, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > I fail to remember the last time one of my builds successfully passed > Travis CI. All I see are timeouts [1]. Other peoples' jobs apparently > make it through Travis OK, so I wander what I can do to increase my > chances? By far the best thin

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 18:44, Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Joshua Root: > > >> [1] https://travis-ci.org/github/macports/macports-ports/jobs/724689780 > > > > It's just a matter of how long your port takes to build (including > > installing all its dependencies). > > Notmuch, which is what was built in

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

ith links to our buildbot builds. Those are the "official builds" of the packages. We could have something similar for the CI. On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 18:52, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > * Mojca Miklavec: > > > If you volunteer to do some research / work in this area ... that &g

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 20:25, Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Mojca Miklavec: > > > We should figure out: > > - which dependencies time out > > - why they are not installed from (the private) binary package repository > > I'm guessing that "we" means th

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

00% sure, but maybe we deliberately removed those at some point because it was consuming significant resources and it was deemed nearly useless. (I'm not saying that's true in your case.) > > We don't "ignore Travis results". > > Mojca Miklavec wrote (quote) &qu

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 20:49, Zero King wrote: > > > I forgot why we never switched from Azure to GitHub Actions. > > Done in commit db7b40d8691e1fcd8b6be5e3c2a2a00a7ce0bdf4. We should > remove Travis CI and Azure Pipelines soon. Awesome, thank you very much! I'm just confused about one thing. The

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 22:43, Clemens Lang wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:48:58PM +, Zero King wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:39:41PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > After a while Azure came around with 6 hours of timeout which was a > > > lot more us

Re: Travis CI timeouts for MacPorts builds

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 19:25, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > * Mojca Miklavec: > > >> If I can assist, let me know, but I don't think it likely at this > >> point. > > > > Because you lack time or for some other reason? > > I would make the time for MacP

Re: Updating OpenSSH port to 8.4p1

Dear Blake, On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 19:56, Blake Garner wrote: > > I see that the port for OpenSSH has no maintainer and hasn't been updated in > a while. Reviewing the docs it looks reasonable for me to try and update the > port and submit it. Is anybody else already working on it? I cannot ans

Fwd: [GSoC Mentors] Announcing GSoC 2021 with a few changes

-- Forwarded message - Hello GSoC Mentors and Org Admins, We are pleased to announce Google Summer of Code 2021 , the 17th consecutive year of the program! As many of you might have heard if you attended the Mentor Summit a couple of weeks ago (or chatted with s

Time to remove Travis support?

Hi, If I understand correctly, we'll soon be unable to run any builds on Travis unless we pay for it (they are gradually moving existing customers to the new billing plan, so it's just a matter of time): https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing We cannot say that this wasn'

Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Set your SMTP password

Dear Clemens, On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 04:37, Clemens Lang wrote: > > If you have a @macports.org email address, please do the following steps > now: > > - Ensure your @macports.org email address has been added to your GitHub >account and is verified on GitHub. > - Go to https://smtpselfservic

Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Set your SMTP password

Dear Clemens, On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 07:14, Clemens Lang wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 06:36:08AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Awesome, thank you very much for setting this up. GMail users > > (including almost every GSOC student) were in fact unable to set up > > send

Re: FYI -- Parallels 16 now supports BigSur as a VM on older systems

On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 22:37, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > > On 2020-12-06-S, at 16:16, Mark Anderson wrote: > > > > Is there a good way to get 10.6 - 10.16 installed in Parallels — I really > > don't want to download all of them from the app store, if that's even > > possible. > > > > —Mark > > I

Re: FYI -- Parallels 16 now supports BigSur as a VM on older systems

On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 23:28, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > > Also, Parallels 16 still runs on MacOS 10.13, which is presently a > requirement for me. You can run VMWare 10 or 11 on 10.13, but that one apparently doesn't officially support any newer macOS as a guest (VMWare 10 doesn't support 10.14

Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems?

On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 17:02, Ruben Di Battista wrote: > > Hi Ryan, thanks for your answer. > > If I configured a server I own to run CI jobs for old systems (I was thinking > about using a custom Gitlab runner libvirt > https://docs.gitlab.com/runner/executors/custom_examples/libvirt.html for

Re: Can we enable CI for legacy systems?

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 15:45, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > Clemens linked in some documentation to the github application runner that > said it ran on 10.13+ only. I'm aware that most of the systems require a relatively recent macOS (buildbot worker runs on ancient systems without any major issues t

Re: Regarding Contribution to MacPorts

Dear Dhruv, On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 09:50, Dhruv Sachdev wrote: > > Hello > I am Dhruv Sachdev, 2nd year student in Computer Engineering at Mumbai > University.I want to start out with open source development and I am really > excited to contribute to great organisations and also develop my skill

Re: PortIndex wasn't updated for 4 days?

On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 04:10, Zhenfu Shi wrote: > > Hi all, > I've been noticing that no ports have been upgraded on my systems for a > few days, and checking rsync.macports.org/macports/release/tarballs/ confirms > that, the index was last updated on Feb 15. Just wondering what’s going on?

Re: Regarding Hello World Task

Dear Rishabh, On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 19:36, Rishabh Garg wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I am Rishabh Garg, a BITS Pilani University student. I want to contribute to > the Macports projects. > > I wanted to know about the tasks that are to be completed before sending the > application for this ye

Re: Very Large Number of Python ports Don't Exist in ${python.default_version } (py39)

On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 11:21, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 1, 2021, at 09:49, Joshua Root wrote: > > > Once that's done, there's no problem adding lots of them in a single commit. > > It can be difficult to get approval from a large number of maintainers for a > single PR. If you're going to submi

Re: Dovecot Update Fails to Build in CI, Trace Mode

Dear Steven, On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 13:07, Steven Smith wrote: > > Re: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/10132 > > I’m trying to update dovecot. A vanilla `port install` works perfectly and > produces perfectly working binaries. > > However, both CI and trace mode builds fail at the

Running macOS inside a Docker container

There's an interesting piece of news on slashdot: Open-Source App Lets Anyone Create a Virtual Army of Hackintoshes https://news.slashdot.org/story/21/03/11/2148210/open-source-app-lets-anyone-create-a-virtual-army-of-hackintoshes https://github.com/sickcodes/Docker-OSX This might potentially s

Ports for buildbot 3

Hi, Buildbot 3 (that is slightly incompatible with buildbot 2) has recently been released. We currently ship: - buildbot-0.8, buildbot-slave-0.8 - buildbot, buildbot-worker (+ dependencies) that provide version 2 So we are basically lacking buildbot 1.x and the new 3.x. I don't see any need to

Re: Ports for buildbot 3

On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 14:41, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2021, at 08:39, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > (I'm still trying to figure out whether buildbot-worker 3.x is > > incompatible with buildbot master 1.x or 2.x. If it's compatible, we > > don'

Re: Built archive not uploaded

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 18:39, Jason Liu wrote: > > It seems that the 10.15 build for port:oidn either failed or something went > wrong when uploading the built package to the public archive: > > https://packages.macports.org/oidn/ > > Could someone with access to the builders It's publicly access

Re: Publicizing MacPorts

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 12:45, Steven Smith wrote: > > If a comparable announcement to this was made for MacPorts, I missed it: > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/mac-utility-homebrew-finally-gets-native-apple-silicon-and-m1-support/ We never made any announcement since it basically "worke

Re: Publicizing MacPorts

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 15:14, Steven Smith wrote: > > > If you have contacts to tech reporters, please use them. I don't have any. > > If Ars Technica or any other news site wants to cover MacPorts, they can do > > that any time. > > This is the wrong attitude. > > MacPorts must tell them, not s

Re: Publicizing MacPorts

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 12:41, Steven Smith wrote: > > > What Ryan is trying to say is that "MacPorts" is in fact just a set of > > random volunteer contributors > > That’s begging the question of an effective communications strategy. A > distributed model of random volunteers is perfect for aggreg

Re: Publicizing MacPorts

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 13:04, Georges Martin wrote: > > Le 22 avr. 2021 à 17:46, Steven Smith a écrit : > > Another reason major news like M1 support must be announced. > > > May I ask: how do we *define* "M1 support" in MacPorts? What are the > *metrics* used to support that statement? > > - Ho

Re: Becoming a legal entity and accepting donations (was: Re: Buildbot Performance)

On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 10:39, Ruben Di Battista wrote: > > Just as a side note, here in France I just created a non-profit association > for a project I'm working on related to the organization of an event, and the > process is almost free and reasonably fast. In a matter of few weeks we had > t

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 07:15, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > People are quoting > > the lack of llvm-9.0 for SnowLeopard on macports as a sign of the demise of > older systems, and it does for some reason show re

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

> > That probably counts as a bug in the Tcl script that returns the list > > of subports to be built. > > I'm not aware of a bug in that script. Do you have any clue or any alternative explanation why llvm-9.0 would be missing on this list? https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_6

Re: Buildbots Down?

On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 14:46, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > > Were the recent buildbot failures related to the perl 5.32 commit…? What do you mean by "recent buildbot failures"? Yes, many p5.32-* subports failed to build, but those were by far not the only failures. Buildbot master itself isn't do

Re: Azure pipeline failing due to parse error

Hi, On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 07:45, Manoj Karthick wrote: > > Hi! I was updating the antibody port, PR: > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/11516 and the Azure Pipeline > check seems to be failing during portindex due to an error parsing an > unrelated port. I didn't check this par

New ports.macports.org website

Dear MacPorts users and developers, I'm really thrilled to see the new version of the ports website finally being deployed at https://ports.macports.org I'm extremely grateful for the excellent work that Arjun did during the GSOC summers of 2019 and 2020. He kept maintaining the code after G

Re: New ports.macports.org website

Hi, On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 18:54, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > > Just took the new site for a spin, and all I can say is - WOW! It looks > great, the design is very logical (if not perfect!), and it’s rich in > functionality. > > It’s clear that a LOT of good thought/discussion went into the UI

Re: New ports.macports.org website

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 11:00, Lothar Haeger wrote: > > May I suggest that you add a (link to a) description to > https://ports.macports.org/statistics/ports that explains what "...users who > submitted stats…" exactly means and how to enable submitting stats as a user > (and how to check if stat

Re: Why does Texinfo explicitly depend on perl 5.30?

On Sat, 4 Sept 2021 at 09:19, Vincent Habchi wrote: > > Well, all is said in the subject :) This was changed in https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/6fe093f0d3afdea30cef8526a400f3d62f2d5f62 My personal guess: no special reason other than trying to use a newer version given that

Re: Help offered

Dear Michele, On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:20, Michele Venturi wrote: > > What is a good way to start partecipate in your > project? I'd like to give you a hand regularly. 🙌 Welcome to MacPorts and thanks a lot for your willingness to help the project grow. There are various ways to help, depending

Re: Help offered

Dear Giuseppe & Michele, On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 12:02, Giuseppe 'ferdy' Miceli wrote: > > I can work on the migration from perl 5.28 to 5.34. > > should michele fancy to start working on macports with this tasks, i can > volunteer to do it together with him so i can support him in these first >

Re: GitHub Sponsors

On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 at 17:33, Vincent Habchi wrote: > > You can also consider registering the MacPorts association outside the US, > e.g. (I don’t toot my own horn, it’s just an example I’m familiar with) in > France, associations are tax-exempt, and, barring the need of one local > person to ha

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >