Stephen P. Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming"
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression
of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention
was a day late and a dollar short and not direct
"Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it.
Stephen> Do as I say, not as I do.
Let's forget about it, then :)
The points that interest me in that discussion are:
- the fact that the
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it.
Stephen> Do as I say, not as I do.
Let's forget about it, then :)
The points that interest me in that discussion are:
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
"Stephen&q
> "Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My apologies. I hadn't realised I was expected to read all your
>> mails as they arrived.
>>
Stephen> You are not when you act as a contributor to the mailing
Stephen> list. However, Angus wrote: > Stephen, cool it please.
Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
> Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression
> of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention
> was a day late and a dollar short and not directed at the instigator.
My apologies. I hadn't realised I was expected to read a
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
SH: You've certainly done a good job in establishing your
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
> SH: You've certainly done a good job in establishing your unique
> qualifications for your sweeping pronouncements.
Stephen, cool it please.
--
Angus
ou are not going to find a bunch of Linux distros jumping onto
the bandwagon. They are not going to devote a large portion of
their release to TeX, nor many man-hours to fixing TeX.
Nor should they. The TC distro works as it stands: no "fixing" is
needed. All RH (or whoever maintains th
Peter Flynn wrote:
> All that's required is for the maintainer of the tetex RPMs to use
> up-to-date versions from CTAN, and for the author of the embedded
> install script in the LyX RPM to test for a working kpsewhich instead
> of assuming it's in the location the RH tete
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 12:13 PM
Subject: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection DVD.
If you do that you are on your own.
No, RH is on its own. Posters to c.t.t have consistently told users
of the RH tetex RPMs to trash them and replace them with the TUG CDs.
One other possibility is to redo the tetex rpm and then yum will
13 matches
Mail list logo
