Re: problems with 1.2.1

2002-12-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 06:56:18PM -0500, rab wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > >All math panel sub menus at the same time? That did work? > > Even if using "\alpha" is easier, it makes no sense to make the math > panel HARDER and less convenient to use than it is now. You don't have > to impr

Re: problems with 1.2.1 (using greek symbols)

2002-12-01 Thread Bo Peng
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:22:49PM -0500, Ralph P. Boland wrote: > IF THIS FEATURE IS GONE THEN I WANT IT BACK! > (I know, I'm an uppity lyx user who hasn't help implement this great > product.) > I have found this feature to be very easy to use and very handy > since I use greek symbols A LOT. I

Re: problems with 1.2.1 (using greek symbols)

2002-12-01 Thread Ralph P. Boland
IF THIS FEATURE IS GONE THEN I WANT IT BACK! (I know, I'm an uppity lyx user who hasn't help implement this great product.) I have found this feature to be very easy to use and very handy since I use greek symbols A LOT. btw, currently I am using lyx 1.1.6 but was planning to upgrade to lyx 1.2

Re: problems with 1.2.1 (using greek symbols)

2002-12-01 Thread Bo Peng
> In order to set this key put the following line in your lyxrc file or > a bind file. > \bind "F9" "math-greek" I think this function is no longer supported in 1.2.1. As a result, I mapped all greek symbols one by one to C-g .. -- Bo Peng

Re: problems with 1.2.1 (using greek symbols)

2002-12-01 Thread Ralph P. Boland
Steven Homolya wrote: What about shortcuts? Greek letters (symbols): [ALT]-m-g-a == \alpha [ALT]-m-g-b == \beta etc. I'm with you on the brackets. I found the shortcut for them some weeks ago, but now I can't remember them or where they are described, so I rely on the math panel again. a

Re: problems with 1.2.1

2002-11-30 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Steven Homolya wrote: > What about shortcuts? > > Greek letters (symbols): > [ALT]-m-g-a == \alpha > [ALT]-m-g-b == \beta > etc. > > I'm with you on the brackets. I found the shortcut for them some weeks > ago, but now I can't remember them or where they are described, so I >

Re: problems with 1.2.1

2002-11-30 Thread Steven Homolya
rab wrote: > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:48PM +, lev kantorovitch wrote: > > > > > >>1. it is not longer possible to have all the math aplletes openned; > >> this was quite a nice and convenient feature: I had all bracket and > >> decorations openned all the ti

Re: problems with 1.2.1

2002-11-29 Thread rab
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:48PM +, lev kantorovitch wrote: 1. it is not longer possible to have all the math aplletes openned; this was quite a nice and convenient feature: I had all bracket and decorations openned all the time ready to get a click, not anymore! W

Re: problems with 1.2.1

2002-11-28 Thread Bo Peng
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:48PM +, lev kantorovitch wrote: > 1. it is not longer possible to have all the math aplletes openned; > this was quite a nice and convenient feature: I had all bracket and > 2. It used to be also possible to avoid extra clicking after using the > math panel t

Re: problems with 1.2.1

2002-11-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:48PM +, lev kantorovitch wrote: > 1. it is not longer possible to have all the math aplletes openned; > this was quite a nice and convenient feature: I had all bracket and > decorations openned all the time ready to get a click, not anymore! > Why on earth did

problems with 1.2.1

2002-11-28 Thread lev kantorovitch
Hi, I have been a LyX user for 5 years now and am very pleased with it: all my scientific produce for the last 5 years has been done with LyX. The code up to version 1.1.6 became better and better which was quite exciting! Presently I am writing a book (with a lot of equations!), I have done about

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - Bad PSGenerated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Steven Homolya
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 01:27, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: > I have input it into 1.2.1 and output. I imagine that 1.1.6fix3 won't be > able to input the LyX document. You can give this a go http://www.spme.monash.edu.au/~stevenh/Public/lyx1.2-to-lyx1.1/ It works for my documents. Table borders might

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Solved!

2002-11-19 Thread Herbert Voss
Richard A. Bilonick schrieb: I agree and the first thing I tried to do was to use the GUI in LyX to change the specs to the same as the other eps graphs that would print. Yet, when I checked the code, the code was not changed and still would not view or print. I had to go in manually and edit

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Solved!

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Herbert Voss wrote: Richard A. Bilonick schrieb: I changed: width 100col% then this is your problem. It is the only change LaTeX parameter and says that your graphics gets a width of the actuell column (line). I suppose, that your image is too big for the page, so it does not work without

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Solved!

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: It's not the fonts nor is it the eps file itself. The LyX code written by LyX appears to be incorrect. Could you check whether there is a difference in the intermediate .tex (LyX -> pdf goes throug

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Solved!

2002-11-19 Thread Herbert Voss
Richard A. Bilonick schrieb: I changed: width 100col% then this is your problem. It is the only change LaTeX parameter and says that your graphics gets a width of the actuell column (line). I suppose, that your image is too big for the page, so it does not work without this parameter. Never

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Solved!

2002-11-19 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: > It's not the fonts nor is it the eps file itself. The LyX code written > by LyX appears to be incorrect. Could you check whether there is a difference in the intermediate .tex (LyX -> pdf goes through .tex, you could obtain th

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Solved!

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
OK, I elimanted the unnecessary text. It's not the fonts nor is it the eps file itself. The LyX code written by LyX appears to be incorrect. I changed the LyX code so that all three graphs have the same specs. I tried first to do this using LyX and it's graph menus. For some reason, LyX would

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Matej Cepl
If I remember correctly, it crashed if you inserted it in a .lyx-file and try to view it with gv? Somehow, netiquette on this list went really down while I wasn't here :-). Would please _everybody_ consider deleting the superfluous text from the previous message you are replying too. Not on

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Christian Ridderström wrote: On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Richard" == Richard A Bilonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> Please see my latest post on this. gv displays the document Richard> EXCEPT for page

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >>"Richard" == Richard A Bilonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > > > >Richard> Please see my latest post on this. gv displays the document > >Richard> EXCEPT for page 9. There is som

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Richard" == Richard A Bilonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> Please see my latest post on this. gv displays the document Richard> EXCEPT for page 9. There is something about the eps graph Richard> created by R that ghostscript doesn't like. I'm at

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - Bad PS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Richard" == Richard A Bilonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> Please see my latest post on this. gv displays the document Richard> EXCEPT for page 9. There is something about the eps graph Richard> created by R that ghostscript doesn't like. I'm at a loss to Richard> explain it becaus

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Max Bian wrote: Well, if I am mistaken, GV needs the ghostscript to display anything. So if gv works fine then you probably not passing the right parameters to the ghostview when printing. The similiar problem happens to me due to a bad EPS figure I included. Try remove the recently added figur

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - Bad PS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Max Bian
Well, if I am mistaken, GV needs the ghostscript to display anything. So if gv works fine then you probably not passing the right parameters to the ghostview when printing. The similiar problem happens to me due to a bad EPS figure I included. Try remove the recently added figures and see it that

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Richard A. Bilonick wrote: Steven Homolya wrote: On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:04, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: I have a 20 page document that I was previously working on using LyX 1.1.6fix3. It would print just fine - all 20 pages via postscript. If I tried to view it through pdf, it would screw up

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing - BadPS Generated by LyX??

2002-11-19 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Steven Homolya wrote: On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:04, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: I have a 20 page document that I was previously working on using LyX 1.1.6fix3. It would print just fine - all 20 pages via postscript. If I tried to view it through pdf, it would screw up some figure captions. Using p

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing

2002-11-18 Thread Steven Homolya
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:04, Richard A. Bilonick wrote: > I have a 20 page document that I was previously working on using LyX > 1.1.6fix3. It would print just fine - all 20 pages via postscript. If I > tried to view it through pdf, it would screw up some figure captions. > Using ps2pdf12 or ps2pdf13

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing

2002-11-18 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
Matej Cepl wrote: Richard A. Bilonick wrote: I have a 20 page document that I was previously working on using LyX 1.1.6fix3. It would print just fine - all 20 pages via postscript. If I tried to view it through pdf, it would screw up some figure captions. Using ps2pdf12 or ps2pdf13 manually

Re: New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing

2002-11-18 Thread Matej Cepl
Richard A. Bilonick wrote: > I have a 20 page document that I was previously working on using LyX > 1.1.6fix3. It would print just fine - all 20 pages via postscript. If I > tried to view it through pdf, it would screw up some figure captions. > Using ps2pdf12 or ps2pdf13 manually rather than us

New More Serious Problems with 1.2.1 - Partial Printing

2002-11-18 Thread Richard A. Bilonick
I have a 20 page document that I was previously working on using LyX 1.1.6fix3. It would print just fine - all 20 pages via postscript. If I tried to view it through pdf, it would screw up some figure captions. Using ps2pdf12 or ps2pdf13 manually rather than using ps2pdf seemed to fix the probl