Hi
>Please file a bug report if the file is not secret (or if you can easily
>create a non-secret one).
For the time it is secret :), but in a couple of weeks it would not be so I'll
have a look at it then.
>Yes. You have two options:
>
>1) Add the line
>
>\sindex[]{translate} %splitidx.sty
>to
Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
> produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
> and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
> problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which
On 2012-02-19, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
> Hi
> I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that produces
> simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file and
> imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have problem
> with \sindex that needs a option i [index_
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which is not
recognized by LyX and theref
Sanda Pavel wrote:
>> Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
>> See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
>
> that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
> version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
> compiling devel release is not easy for my config
Actually, that page contains links to "backports".
from the page:
**
"tex2lyx will be part of the upcoming 1.4 release of
LyX. This page page describes its use with older LyXes
(such as the current stable release, LyX 1.3.x) and
provides some ready-to-use pa
On Sunday 20 November 2005 14:47, Sanda Pavel wrote:
> > Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
> > See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
>
> that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
> version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
> compiling devel
> Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
> See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel release is not easy for my configuration now, so
i will wait f
Sanda,
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
versions.
Just an idea...
Regards,
Nusret
--- Sanda Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the input file all that well. You must not rely
> on assumptions that con-
> the input file all that well. You must not rely on assumptions that con-
>
> version in both ways (namely LyX <-> LaTeX) is non-lossy. If you collabo-
>
i expected that the conversion wont be identical. wh
_/ On Fri 18 Nov 2005 19:38:34 GMT, [Sanda Pavel] wrote : \_
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
My personal experience has shown that import of LaTeX into LyX suffers
from a few incompatibilities (or gaps), especially when m
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
after import into lyx all the formulas look fine, export works etc,
but when i save+close+reopen the lyx file, it
is no longer exportable and also information about symbols in
the formulas change from "Type
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2005, Luis Rivera wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I compiled lyx2lyx into a self-contained executable (a couple of
> > libraries required, all of them placed together), but I don't know how
> > to post it to the Wiki. This package may supersede Ruurd's distr
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
> > essential modules are missing.
> > Thomas Greiner
> >
> > On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
>
> It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirec
TGreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Yes , at first I tried the original version in RuurdÂs package
> essential modules are missing.
> Thomas Greiner
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirect pythonpath to t
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>Jose' Matos wrote:
>> On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
>>> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
> doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the later
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
>> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
>> with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
>> python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
>> dump
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 21:18, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Angus,
> I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe.
You didn't. However, the best way to prevent misunderstandings from
developing in an email correspondence is by being clear and firm that
a particular statment is not correct.
Anyway, I'm g
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
> with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
> python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
> dump the python version packe
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus Leeming ...> writes:
>
> >
> > Junk (throw away) the python that Ruurd packaged with LyX 1.3.5 and go
> > get a real python package from www.python.org.
> >
> > Angus
> >
> >
>
> You ain't to throw away nothing. Just add the right paths t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> TGreiner wrote:
> > -t 221 doesnÂt work: 241: Format not supported
> > or single -to doesnÂt work. I get the old error.
> > Thomas
>
> ... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
> packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doe
>Angus Leeming
>Tue, 17 May 2005 14:25:33 -0700
>
>Luis Rivera wrote:
Angus,
I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe. I apologize. Let me
explain:
>... reLyX generates a horrible mish-mash
>of different file formats that must "somehow" be deciphered by
lyx2lyx.
>
>tex2lyx generates a complet
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
> I take the opportunity of this thread about tex2lyx to complete what Angus
> said. The current version of tex2lyx deals correctly with multipart
> documents However, lyx2lyx does not know about dependencies, so that
> retroconversion to 221 must be made on each \input
Now I could convert:
Newest Python
Newest lyx2lyx (not from Lyx1.3.5 package)
Thanks
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:39 +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>TGreiner wrote:
>> -t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
>> or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
>> Thomas
>
>... and this err
>>From: Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "TGreiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Latex import problem
>>Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:31:12 +0100
>>Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>
>>On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doesn't contain many of the
modules of standard python that the LyX 1
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 13:48:52 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>> TGreiner wrote:
>>
>> > a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains c
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> TGreiner wrote:
>
> > a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
> > images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
> > b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
> >
> > python lyx2lyx -to 221 t
TGreiner wrote:
> a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
> images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
> b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
>
> python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx > test13.lyx
> 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
>
TGreiner wrote:
> a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
> images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
Could you post your original .tex file that you cannot convert to LyX 1.4
format using tex2lyx. If you don't want to post it to the list, then post
it to l
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx > test13.lyx
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
o: Invalid LyX format
Thomas G
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner wrote:
> Dear Angus,
> thank you for your hints. I could run tex2lyx in a command window.
> The Latex file is imported (I see a lot of messages of the included
> images - no errors), but no output file is created. What do I have
> to do? T. Greiner
You have
Luis Rivera wrote:
> AFAIK, LaTeX import occurs in two phases: first reLyX/tex2lyx translates
> LaTeX to some version of LyX, and then lyx2lyx converts it to the right
> version of LyX format you may be using: 221, for LyX 1.3.5
That's essentially correct. However, reLyX generates a horrible mish-
"
> Please can you give me advice.
> Thanks.
> T. Greiner
Please don't reply to mails when you wish to start an entirely new thread.
I'm likely to miss your post as it appears in my reader as
- [Fwd: Re: Metapost problems]marc
|_ Latex import problem TGrei
Uwe StÃhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> TGreiner schrieb:
>
> > I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. By importing a Latex
> > document, I got the following error:
> > "Der Befehl "...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx" ist entweder
> > falsch
> > geschrieben oder konnte nicht gef
TGreiner schrieb:
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. By importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
"Der Befehl "...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx" ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden."
LyXWin is still a bit buggy in including/converting
Hello,
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. Buy importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
"Der Befehl "...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx" ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden."
Please can you give me advice.
Thanks.
T. Greiner
38 matches
Mail list logo