Re: Problem using Natbib

Got it. Thanks for your help!! On 9/7/11 4:10 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/02/2011 04:16 PM, Alan Greene wrote: Certainly. The attached files currently compile, but with Natbib chosen, a "something is missing" error occurs. If an incompatible bst is chosen (like humannat), "control sequence" e

Re: Problem using Natbib

On 09/02/2011 04:16 PM, Alan Greene wrote: > Certainly. The attached files currently compile, but with Natbib > chosen, a "something is missing" error occurs. If an incompatible bst > is chosen (like humannat), "control sequence" errors are produced. > It's the \usepackage[nospace]{cite} comman

Re: Problem using Natbib

I'll have a look at this soon. Much to do today rh On 09/02/2011 04:16 PM, Alan Greene wrote: > Certainly. The attached files currently compile, but with Natbib > chosen, a "something is missing" error occurs. If an incompatible bst > is chosen (like humannat), "control sequence" errors are

Re: Problem using Natbib

Certainly. The attached files currently compile, but with Natbib chosen, a "something is missing" error occurs. If an incompatible bst is chosen (like humannat), "control sequence" errors are produced. On 9/2/11 1:35 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/02/2011 12:30 PM, Alan Greene wrote: Hi All,

Re: Problem using Natbib

On 09/02/2011 12:30 PM, Alan Greene wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to adapt a University of Chicago LyX dissertation template > to my particular citation needs and have found that it only compiles > when all citations are (1) in 'default (numerical)' citation style and > (2) 'plain' or 'ieeetr' bs

Re: problem when using natbib reference

It depends on the bibliography style you are using. Check this: http://www.cs.stir.ac.uk/~kjt/software/latex/showbst.html Regards. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Mon, May 30, 2011

problem when using natbib reference

Hi, I am using Lyx 1.6.7. when I try to use natbib package with author year style, the intext references are displayed without the square brackets in the end as Text Liu et. Al (1998) textinstead of text [Liu et. Al (1998)] text This problem does not appear when I choose numeric style. Can u

Re: Generating Author Index in Lyx (+ errors using natbib)

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:42, you wrote: > Maybe I misunderstand, but doesn't one use the \makeindex command to > create an index file for the standard makeidx package? In the > instructions for the index package, one uses the following command > sequence on tex files: (th

Re: Generating Author Index in Lyx (+ errors using natbib)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Using other packages like index.sty, apacite, and others, but they > all require me to run separate commands (usually makeindex) which > isn't easy to do from within LyX since the intermediate files are not > lying around Not sure I understand. Why can't you run makei

Generating Author Index in Lyx (+ errors using natbib)

Hi, I want to create an author index for my document (using bibtex), but have been having some problems. I don't like the citation format of natbib (I want apalike i.e. [Author, 2002], although natbib does create an author index which works. I did find that I could live with abbrvnat style, but,

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Friday 13 May 2005 14:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I copied parts of your post to this page Great. The answer from Jürgen is excellent. Janus -- Roskilde University, Denmark. Department of Technology and Social Science. International Development Studies. ESST - Society, Science and Techno

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I copied parts of your post to this page > > > > http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background > > I hope it is all historically correct. Well, I just quoted you ;-) /C -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I copied parts of your post to this page > > http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background I hope it is all historically correct. > /Christian > > Btw, I assumed that you use a 'ü'  in Spitzmüller... certainly. Jürgen.

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > > Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little > > on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you > > recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like: > > > >

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little > on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you > recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like: > > - The difference between BiBteX, NatBib, JureBib etc. Bibtex

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > >> Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been >> designed for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't >> expect it to work with natbib. > > Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed > for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it > to work with natbib. Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to st

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > Strange. It sounds a little like the > problem Meri Williams described in an posting on May 5, 2005. Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it to work with natbib.

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:07, Angus Leeming wrote: > Insert->Note[ Insert->Citation ] Ah, ok. > Nope. LyX will only add "\usepackage[...]{natbib}" to the generated LaTeX > file if it sees that you have a citation entry. OK. I already have a few citations in the text. Janus -- Roskilde Uni

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

Angus Leeming wrote: > > Sorry. I do not understand what you mean by "comment environment". Could > > you please explain > > Insert->Note[ Insert->Citation ] Or (rather) "Comment" from the Layout combo box. Jürgen

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Thursday 12 May 2005 09:36, Rob S wrote: > Try adding this to the document preamble - it works using \nocite{*}, > apalike and Natbib producing the output as you require: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED] , #2\fi)} > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank. Now all my literature is listed in a apa like

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > >> Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you >> have inserted a citation inset. > > No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal > citations in the text as we

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you > have inserted a citation inset. No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal citations in the text as well. > There are two options: > - pu

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

Janus Sandsgaard wrote: > by inserting "\nocite{*}" as ERT in my LyX document. But this changes the > look of my bibliography from "apalike" - author (year) title - to a > numerical notation. > > I am using NatBib with the "autor-year" option. > Styl

Re: \nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

by inserting "\nocite{*}" as ERT in my LyX document. But this changes the look of my bibliography from "apalike" - author (year) title - to a numerical notation. I am using NatBib with the "autor-year" option. Style: "apalike". LyX 1.3.4 on Linux H

\nocite{*} changes bibliography style (when using natbib)

. But this changes the look of my bibliography from "apalike" - author (year) title - to a numerical notation. I am using NatBib with the "autor-year" option. Style: "apalike". LyX 1.3.4 on Linux What am I doing wrong? How do I ask NatBib to add literature to the

Re: Problem with using NatBib under Beamer

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:35:41 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using NatBib together with Beamer, but I get the following error: > > ! LaTeX Error: \newblock undefined. > > See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. > Type H for immedia

Problem with using NatBib under Beamer

Dear All I am using NatBib together with Beamer, but I get the following error: ! LaTeX Error: \newblock undefined. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Type H for immediate help. ... l.1 \begin{thebibliography}{} If I unselected NatBib, no error occurs. Any ideas

Re: Using natbib

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:52:28PM +, Ernesto Jardim wrote: > To use parenthetical references it should use either \cite[] or, as > preferred by the natbib author, the \citep command. > > How can I change this ? Try to put something like this into Layout/Preamble: \let\cite=\citep M

Using natbib

Hi I'm using natbib but I want to use parenthetical references by default. The LaTeX file produced by LyX uses the \cite command, that is treated as a textual reference by natbib. So the default becomes a textual reference. To use parenthetical references it should use either \cite[] o