I'll have a look at this soon. Much to do today.... rh
On 09/02/2011 04:16 PM, Alan Greene wrote: > Certainly. The attached files currently compile, but with Natbib > chosen, a "something is missing" error occurs. If an incompatible bst > is chosen (like humannat), "control sequence" errors are produced. > > On 9/2/11 1:35 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 09/02/2011 12:30 PM, Alan Greene wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm trying to adapt a University of Chicago LyX dissertation template >>> to my particular citation needs and have found that it only compiles >>> when all citations are (1) in 'default (numerical)' citation style and >>> (2) 'plain' or 'ieeetr' bst (but not 'humannat,' which I'd like to >>> use). When I attempt to employ Natbib and/or a bst file such as >>> humannat, I receive numerous errors like these: >>> >>> ! Paragraph ended before \org@@citex was complete >>> >>> and >>> >>> ! Paragraph ended before \NAT@@citetp was complete >>> >>> Here's the master file preamble for your reference, as I really don't >>> know which aspects may be causing the problem. (The 'slave' chapter >>> preambles are almost identical except that they lack the bibliographic >>> and appendix portions). >>> >> FYI: If these are child documents, then their preambles aren't actually >> used during compilation of the whole document. They'd only be used if >> you try to compile the chapters as standalone documents. >> >>> I first posted this on the latex-community forum, but then realized >>> that their LyX thread seems to have very low activity. Thanks in >>> advance for your help and expertise! >>> >> I don't really see anything in the preamble that would be likely to >> cause this problem. Could you create a simple test document that >> exhibits this issue? >> >> Richard >> >
