On 13 Mar 2001 14:15:40 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> It should not hard to write a command for case 1 (called
> Dekel> \setcommand for example):
>
> I think that this command is a bad idea (and does not exis
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> It should not hard to write a command for case 1 (called
Dekel> \setcommand for example):
I think that this command is a bad idea (and does not exist in latex
for the same reason): it is clear that most first time users will use
this
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
>e.g.: For imaginary and real part of a complex numberI prefer Im and Re
>(in roman) : as \Re and \Im is already defind in LaTeX (inserting R and I
>in fractur), redefine them with \renewcommand in the preamble. I cannot
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:41:29PM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Actually there are 4 variants of what a user might want :
>
>| command already defined | command not defined | LaTeX command
> ---
> 1 | use my version | us
On 12 Mar 2001 14:22:35 +0100 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > "Guenter" == Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Guenter> - there should be a possibility to choice between
> Guenter> \newcommand, \renewcommand, and \@ifundefined \newcommand
> Guenter> (else) \re
On 12 Mar 2001 14:22:35 +0100 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > "Guenter" == Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Guenter> - there should be a possibility to choice between
> Guenter> \newcommand, \renewcommand, and \@ifundefined \newcommand
> Guenter> (else) \re
>>From: Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:19:24 -0500 (EST)
>>To: "Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Cc: "LyX disc. list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Sugestions for a new LaTex Preamble
> "Guenter" == Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Guenter> - there should be a possibility to choice between
Guenter> \newcommand, \renewcommand, and \@ifundefined \newcommand
Guenter> (else) \renewcommand
I'd rather use \providecommand for all macros.
JMarc
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:58:23 +0100 (CET) Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think something like mathed's "macros" could be "ported" to the rest of
> LyX. This allows at least the handling of \newcommand, in theory
> \newenvironment should not be much harder to do...
Although I am not
> Samstag, 10. März 2001 20:40, Matej Cepl wrote
> > Let me comment a little bit on your proposal. On the one hand I
> > strongly believe, that some \new{command,environment} tool is The
> > Right Thing. However, I believe also, that it should be done in
> > some more thorough way.
I think someth
Samstag, 10. März 2001 20:40, Matej Cepl wrote
> > Let me comment a little bit on your proposal. On the one hand I
> strongly believe, that some \new{command,environment} tool is The
> Right Thing. However, I believe also, that it should be done in
> some more thorough way.
>
> I am a lawyer and I
Matej Cepl writes:
I would like to separate Thomas' proposal into three block [...]
new environment tool aka Format/Style/Paragraph style in M$-Word --
[...] new character style aka Format/Style/Paragraph style in
M$-Word [...]
This strikes me as exactly what LyX does NOT need. When al
ion rather
easily).
Any comments?
Have
a nice day
Matej
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: Sugestions for a new LaTex P
Dear Lyx Developers
I woul sugest a new editing environment for the Latex preamble
menu. Due to now it's quite inconvenient to edit the Latex
preamble, the predefined font is too small for bigger screen
resolutions and most of all the editing funktions are very poor.
First I would sugest to
14 matches
Mail list logo
