Re: The AMS align environment

2005-06-06 Thread Srinivas Nedunuri
thanks. I'll take a look at it - Original Message - From: "Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:41 AM Subject: Re: The AMS align environment > Srinivas Nedunuri wrote: > > > Georg. > > Here's what I would li

Re: The AMS align environment

2005-06-06 Thread Georg Baum
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote: > Georg. > Here's what I would like: > > f(x)= 1+2+3 > g(x,y) = 4+5 > > Here's what Lyx's version of the AMS align gives me if I use *3* columns > (in the dvi previewer so i'm pretty sure its what would get printed): >f(x) = 1+2+3 > g(x,y) = 4+5 > Again: It

Re: The AMS align environment

2005-06-05 Thread Srinivas Nedunuri
at I can tell, Lyx's implementation of AMS align is doing something odd. cheers - Original Message - From: "Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 7:48 AM Subject: Re: The AMS align environment > Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 05:47 schrieb Sriniva

Re: The AMS align environment

2005-06-05 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 05:47 schrieb Srinivas Nedunuri: > right hand side elements all line up very strangely. Can anyone explain > how the Lyx align element is actually *supposed* to be used? I could Exactly like it is described in the AMS documentation. The output on screen might be wrong II