Georg. Here's what I would like: f(x) = 1+2+3 g(x,y) = 4+5
Here's what Lyx's version of the AMS align gives me if I use *3* columns (in the dvi previewer so i'm pretty sure its what would get printed): f(x) = 1+2+3 g(x,y) = 4+5 I can get it to not right justify the stuff after the = sign by using *2* columns and perhaps that is why the default align does only bring up two columns. However, the left hand side is still right justified. I can get exactly what I want using eqnarray, but I read somewhere that align is prefered to eqnarray. Unf. from what I can tell, Lyx's implementation of AMS align is doing something odd. cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 7:48 AM Subject: Re: The AMS align environment > Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 05:47 schrieb Srinivas Nedunuri: > > right hand side elements all line up very strangely. Can anyone explain > > how the Lyx align element is actually *supposed* to be used? I could > > Exactly like it is described in the AMS documentation. The output on > screen might be wrong IIRC, but LaTeX output is fine. Remember that a > column in LyX is an '&' sign in LaTeX, so if the documentation suggests > something like > > a&=b&+c > > you have to create three columns in LyX: > > a =b +c > > > Georg
