What is with all these single word subject lines?
"How do I highlight an equation?" is much more informative as a
subject. ("in LyX" is probably not necessary when sending to a LyX
Users mailing list. In most cases I would presume you were asking
about how to do it in LyX...)
--
lyx-users mailing
El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 1:26, Carlos Knauer ()
escribió:
> How do I highlight an equation in LyX?
>
To change the text&symbols color, just select the whole equation and Right
click → Text properties → Customize.
To change the background, you can either follow section 9 of the Math
editor manu
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> So it's true: great minds think alike!
Indeed, I played with negative spaces previously but didn't get anything
useful. I was hoping there might be a more elegant, e.g., preamble-only,
approach to redefine spacings for equations. Regardle
On 04/06/2017 10:23 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote:
A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the
vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent
because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is
there
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote:
A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the
vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent
because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is
there a known fix?
Joel,
What I would do is i
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I don't know if there's a module for this, but it's not hard to do. The
> first key is that you'll want the display mode math in a Standard, rather
> then Itemize (or Enumerate), environment to get it to center properly.
>
> As to what comes
On 04/05/2017 04:20 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
Colleagues:
My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative
to the frame and not the indent level of the current environment.
This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion
addresses equation alignment w
> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
>
> Guillaume
>
Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume!
Best regards
Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit :
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
> I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
> equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
> between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
> (2.3.3)DELTA.
>
> Create a math ma
Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
> variant?
>
> Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
>
> For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ
> The counting is continuous, som
On 2012-01-16, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I've now tried your "equation editor/picture cropper" at
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7839 using GSview for postscript and
> Acroreader for pdf.
> For both template files, EPS.lyx and PDF-cropped.lyx, I had to reduce
> the \lyxformat from 416 to 413 f
On 03/10/2011 10:25 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
The justification is different in LyX than it is in the output, which
might be something to worry about in the future.
I also have found that the display in LyX of the alignment of math
columns can get confused, although when you close and reopen
On 10/03/2011 11:45 AM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
Thanks, after pasting in the text and then examining it I was able to
figure out the correct approach. It appears my earlier alignment
difficulty stemmed from placing the equals sign in its own column. Now
I create a four-column structure in the align
Thanks, after pasting in the text and then examining it I was able to
figure out the correct approach. It appears my earlier alignment
difficulty stemmed from placing the equals sign in its own column. Now
I create a four-column structure in the align environment, with
equation= in the first column
On 10/03/2011 11:23 AM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
I'm able to type plain text as you've suggested but I'm still unable
to get the alignment and spacing right. I can type text to the right
of an equation on a given line, spacing it out from the equation using
something like \quad. However, then the a
I'm able to type plain text as you've suggested but I'm still unable
to get the alignment and spacing right. I can type text to the right
of an equation on a given line, spacing it out from the equation using
something like \quad. However, then the annotations from different
lines of the equation
On 10/02/2011 10:54 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
On 10/02/2011 08:27 PM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
I'm trying to understand how I can add annotations that sit to the
right of each line of a multiline equation. For example, in a proof,
such annotations might provide justification for each step in the
On 10/02/2011 08:27 PM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
I'm trying to understand how I can add annotations that sit to the
right of each line of a multiline equation. For example, in a proof,
such annotations might provide justification for each step in the
proof.
In pure LaTeX I could accomplish this lik
alpking hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
>
> Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
> before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
> that : (4.13), m
On 06/15/2010 12:39 PM, Michael Dzjaparidze wrote:
Hi Richard,
I hope you dont mind me mailing you directly, but I'm not on the
mailing list.
That's fine, but I'll see it on the list, too.
I tried to "fake" the brackets like you suggested. The strange thing
is that in math mode you can mak
On 6/15/2010 6:41 AM, Michael Dzjaparidze wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new to Lyx and I have a problem I can't solve on my own. I've
searched on the internet for a solution, but could not really find it,
although it is pretty obvious I think.
The problem is that I have several long mathematical expressi
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the attac
sabato 07 novembre 2009, 16:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Giovanni Bacci wrote:
> > I've tried exporting in pdflatex and doing pdflatex file.tex
> > directly, and i get the attached error.
>
> FYI this error log can also be obtained directly in LyX (Document ->
> LaTeX Log File)
I'm not aware o
Giovanni Bacci wrote:
> I've tried exporting in pdflatex and doing pdflatex file.tex
> directly, and i get the attached error.
FYI this error log can also be obtained directly in LyX (Document -> LaTeX Log
File)
> Maybe it depends on pdflatex or
> pgf/tikz version? Or there's something misconfig
Giovanni Bacci wrote:
Hi all! I'm experiencing a strange behaviour. A bug i suppose.
Anyway, i cannot compile the attached simple document.
Removing /usepackage{tikz} from the preamble makes everything goes
fine. It's a bug? Or i doing something wrong?
btw:
lyx 1.6.4 on FedoraCore 10
pdflatex
sabato 07 novembre 2009, 16:27, Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Giovanni Bacci wrote:
> > Hi all! I'm experiencing a strange behaviour. A bug i suppose.
> > Anyway, i cannot compile the attached simple document.
> > Removing /usepackage{tikz} from the preamble makes everything goes
> > fine. It's a bug?
Giovanni Bacci wrote:
> Hi all! I'm experiencing a strange behaviour. A bug i suppose.
> Anyway, i cannot compile the attached simple document.
> Removing /usepackage{tikz} from the preamble makes everything goes
> fine. It's a bug? Or i doing something wrong?
The document compiles fine for me.
J
Julio Rojas wrote:
I made it with eqarray, but it "only" allows me to have 3 columns. How
did you add more columns?
Oops -- forgot about that. I'm not very consistent in what I use (I
just went back and loaded some old papers to look). Sometimes I use
eqnarray (which is locked into three co
I made it with eqarray, but it "only" allows me to have 3 columns. How
did you add more columns?
I tried using alignat and it works ok, except for the fact that LyX
doesn't show proper alignment (only the first column is right aligned,
while all of the others are left aligned.
Thanks for your hel
Julio,
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks Paul, I've tried it but the first column is right aligned and
the third is left aligned.
In the alignat* example? Shouldn't be -- the alignment alternates
right-left-right, so the first and third columns should have the same
alignment. Note that the first c
Thanks Paul, I've tried it but the first column is right aligned and
the third is left aligned. I'm kind of new on the subject and the
references I have from a friend make them left and right aligned,
respectively. Is there an standard way of aligning them?
-
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks, I've already done that, but no option seems to be of help. I'm
trying to put an integer programing model and every restriction should
be numbered and aligned like:
Maximize Z (1)
Subject to:
Z=sum(Xi)
Thanks, I've already done that, but no option seems to be of help. I'm
trying to put an integer programing model and every restriction should
be numbered and aligned like:
Maximize Z (1)
Subject to:
Z=sum(Xi) (2)
Julio Rojas writes:
>
> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
> equation array? Or some rows from an array?
> -
> Julio Rojas
> jcredbe...@...
>
Please have a look at Help>Math (or Ecuaciones) where you can
find a ve
Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX
purists, please don't hate me!)
/Paul
ECUACIÓN2.lyx
Description: application/lyx
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Can you be more specific? What do you men by "align?"
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document -> Settings. On the "Document
Class" page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
=
Thanks Vittorio, but this solution is not the one I'm looking for. I
would like the right column to be right aligned and the left column to
be left aligned. When I do that with your solution (changing the "rl"
to "lr") this turns our to be the original matrix I started with. As I
said, I need the r
Thank you Vittorio. What I would like with this matrix is that the
right column can overfill the left one and viceversa. That way I can
have the long equations and the cases in two lines (eq. on the left
column, cases on the right column) every other line.
d= a+b+c+d+e+f+g
if a,b,c
Hello Julio,
i do not know if i've understood your question.
Anyway, probably you can be interested one of this...
First solution:
press CTRL+L entering in ERT mode and then:
\begin{eqnarray}
d &=& a + b, if a>1 \nonumber \\
&=& a-b, if a<1 \nonumber \\
&=&0, if a=1 \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
Secon
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class.
/Paul
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
> LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económica
You got it.
bigblop wrote:
>
>
>
> David Hewitt wrote:
>>
>> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display
>> formula numbering" and you'll get what you want.
>>
>>
>> bigblop wrote:
>>>
>>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
>>> correctl
David Hewitt wrote:
>
> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula
> numbering" and you'll get what you want.
>
>
> bigblop wrote:
>>
>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
>> correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all e
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula
numbering" and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
>
> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly
> in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
>
-
David Hewi
James schrieb:
I should have mentioned that this is on a Mac. I haven't tried the windows
version...
Then plese file a bug report at
bugzilla.lyx.org
thanks and regards
Uwe
I should have mentioned that this is on a Mac. I haven't tried the windows
version...
On 5/21/07 5:10 PM, "Uwe Stöhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James schrieb:
>
>> In 1.50 beta 3, there may be a bug in resizing equations. If I go to
>> preferences -> screen fonts and change the zoom from 1
James schrieb:
In 1.50 beta 3, there may be a bug in resizing equations. If I go to
preferences -> screen fonts and change the zoom from 150% (the default) to
anything else, the text is resized properly but the equations are not. This
was not a problem in the beta 2 version.
Works for mere o
Gary wrote:
> Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
> \renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
> Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
>
You can put it in the preamble.
> \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
> This
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David, Richard thanks.
David your suggestion worked like a charm.
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation
Gary wrote:
> I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
> I'm not exactly sure what class to use.
All of the things you mention can be redefined fairly easily. You might
want to look at the koma-script classes, which have a lot of built-in
customization possibilities. The documentation is very complete. Yo
Gary wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use. The problem is this:
If I use the book class, the top level sectioning environment is chapter and
the numbering of the equations inherit the chapter number. Equation's on
chapter 1 will be numbered: 1.1, 1
Nick Kuzmik wrote:
Does anyone know a way to increase the font size of equations?
You can put \DeclareMathSizes in the preamble. See
http://www.andy-roberts.net/misc/latex/latextutorial10.html (search for
DeclareMathSizes on the page).
/Paul
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than Equat
> The word "Figure" is part of the "caption" paragraph type. That
> is why they tell you to change it to "standard" instead of "caption"
I had no idea that "Figure" appeared because it is a paragraph type. I
thought it was a part of the float and could not be removed or changed.
Thank you, your s
LB wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a double
column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old threads
about this (see below).
A solution to the newer message was to: "After you have inserted the figure
float, set the cursor behind the
Hi
What worked even better than "cuted" is \begin{figure*} because "cuted"
follows strange rules when it places the text around two-column equations
and "midfloat" which should do better did not work. I suspect it did not
work because my equation is in the right column
Leo
> LB wrote:
> > Hi
>
Hi
"cuted" worked pretty good.
Thank you
Leo
> LB wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a
double
> > column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old
threads
> > about this (see below).
> >
> > A solution to the newer message wa
LB wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a double
column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old threads
about this (see below).
A solution to the newer message was to: "After you have inserted the figure
float, set the cursor behind the
.(2.2) becomes
Eq.(2) but the removefromreset has had no effect.
Any ideas.
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 19:16
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Richard Heck; Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Y
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am ass
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
e
ks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short of mod
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding "\": [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But a
I mispelt it. What next?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly
Dear Jens
I only have the 2 statements you suggested in my preamble. I will try Richards
advice.
Best
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:40
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation
6 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to
Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
> To: Mike Reeks
> Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Equation numbering
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
>
>
>> Dear Uwe
>> Nearly there.
pelt it. What next?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
> Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
> section .without th
Thanks Jens.
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
> Nearly ther
/08/2006 21:23
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to
absolute numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document prefe
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences):
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equa
Use the remreset package, available on CTAN.
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
> Mike
>
>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>From: Myriam Abramson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Equation help
>>Date: 03 Aug 2006 21:35:05 -0400
>>
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>Any ideas on how to nicely write a fairly long equation on multiple
>>lines? here's an example of such an equation. Would you suggest
>>to extract
Ares wrote:
From: Eitan Gurari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:03:11 -0400
Subject: Re: lyx-users Digest 26 Jun 2006 15:12:57 - Issue 1937
> It worked very well with a slight exception. I see well close up,
> and the math equations produced are 15-20% t
Ares wroteb:
I tried
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
but i get the error messages:
1) Missing \begin{document}
2) Undefined control sequence.
\numberwithin
{equation}{chapter}
What else should I know?
You have to use AMS-math. Enable it in the menu Document -> Settings ->
M
Liu Feng wrote:
It is great, I got it after set 'reqno' in option by Document class->class
setting.
But I use 'book' class when I start my manuscript, but now it displays
'book(AMS)', what is different between 'book' and 'book(AMS)', I know AMS
presents American Math. Soc., But I wonder if 'b
Liu Feng wrote:
Thank you for expertise response, it works. But the
equation number goes to the left of the equation, I
want it set on the right, could you gave me anothery
key to fix it?
Then you use a special document class or your document uses the option
"leqno" (in LyX's menu Document ->
Liu Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,Sir
> I could not number equations like 5.1, 5.2 within
> section 5.1 in Chapter 5. All eaqutions numbered just
> start from (1),(2) in global way. How to number
> eqaution according to the number of section or the
> number of chapter.
>
I have added
Liu Feng schrieb:
I could not number equations like 5.1, 5.2 within
section 5.1 in Chapter 5.
Add the following line to your LyX document preamble:
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
regards Uwe
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:04:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> As I said: The current behaviour was implemented explicitly as
> Andre> response to a very detailed user-request.
>
> Andre> I don't like it particularily,
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> As I said: The current behaviour was implemented explicitly as
Andre> response to a very detailed user-request.
Andre> I don't like it particularily, but I don't like the \# <-> #,
Andre> \{ <-> { business either.
What would you d
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:23:03AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Ilya Soifer wrote:
>
> >I want it to be a 3x3 array (so that A's are aligned '=''s are aligned
> >and B+C's are aligned.
> >In Lyx 1.3 it was sufficient to write A=B+C and then to Ctrl-ENTER
> >somewhere in the middle of the formula to g
Ilya Soifer wrote:
I want it to be a 3x3 array (so that A's are aligned '=''s are aligned
and B+C's are aligned.
In Lyx 1.3 it was sufficient to write A=B+C and then to Ctrl-ENTER
somewhere in the middle of the formula to get such an array
LyX 1.4 by default generates an array of two columns.
D
Georg Baum wrote:
Please add this bug report at http://bugzilla.lyx.org.
I did this (I reported other math related bugs, so I also added this to
be not forgotten), it is bug 2577:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2577
regards Uwe
Am Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 15:06 schrieb Dmitry Khvorostyanov:
> -
> \newcommand{\tc}{c}
> \newcommand{\pd}[2]{ \frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2} }
> \newcommand{\eq}[2][nolabel]{\begin{equation}\label{#1}#2\end{equation}}
> --
Thank you very much! The solution you gave me in the first email was OK, but
when I cut and pasted your suggestions I got the first line commented
\numberwithin{section}{chapter}
and because of the wordwrap, I could not realize it immediately! May I suggest
to avoid such a wordwrap for the LaTe
iprmaster schrieb:
Anyway, I get now only two numbers e.g. chnum.eqnum or sectnum.eqnum
(according the \numberwithin arguments).
In the previous version I had chnum.secnum.eqnum.
But this is what you get with this preamble:
\numberwithin{section}{chapter}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\nu
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:51, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> iprmaster wrote:
> > I imported a LyX 1.3 project (i.e. a master.lyx + other *.lyx files
> > included) into the new LyX 1.4 version. Everthing works out of the box
> > but the numbering: now figures and equations do not have the chapter
> > num
iprmaster wrote:
I imported a LyX 1.3 project (i.e. a master.lyx + other *.lyx files
included) into the new LyX 1.4 version. Everthing works out of the box but
the numbering: now figures and equations do not have the chapter number any
more and a single number is used across all chapters.
I
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
In Lyx/Latex how can I control the formatting of the equations numbers. At
present I have
(1.1) (1.2) etc...
what I need is
[1.1] [1.2] etc...
Is there a simple way to do this?
Ad the following line to the preamble:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@@{[#1]}}
regards U
On Thu, 12 May 2005 10:20:04 +0100 (BST)
Geoffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to achieve the following and wondered whether it is possible. I
> think it should be can't get it to work.
>
> I have an erray of equations
>
> x=blah
> y=boo eq(1.1)
> z=cow
>
> and I
Hi Geoffrey Lloyd,
I looked at what people answer you, and gothered it with something i
have, to compute this answer:
You would need to add in ERT (Control + L) this:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesubsection.\arabic\{equation}}
Then you would need to use M-N lin Uwn said to place the equations
Hi Geoff,
as a completely newbie, I've been finding ways to cheat to do exactly what you want.
I've attached my effort- doubtless there are much better ways of doing it.
Regards
BrianGeoffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HiI want to achieve the following and wondered whether it is possib
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
I have an erray of equations
x=blah
y=boo eq(1.1)
z=cow
and I want a single equation number on the middle line as shown
Number just the second line with the shortcut M-N (not M-n). Or use the
corresponding Menu.
Isn't this described in the userguide?
regards Uwe
On 31.01.05, Rich Shepard wrote:
> When I enter part of the equation and press ctrl-enter the cursor moves to
> the right of the = that begins the RHS of the equation.
>
> I suspect that I need to envoke multiline before entering any of the
> equation, is this correct?
How about LHS, Ctrl-E
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
