Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

Uwe Stöhr wrote: TechTonics wrote: I tried for a couple of hours to discover the missing files and it is a real PITA. I found the problem: I simply don't deliver all python encoding files in the local installation. I will release a bugfix release of the installer later this week. many

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

TechTonics wrote: I tried for a couple of hours to discover the missing files and it is a real PITA. I found the problem: I simply don't deliver all python encoding files in the local installation. I will release a bugfix release of the installer later this week. many thanks again regards

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

Uwe Stöhr wrote: TechTonics wrote: You tell that the original script with the encoding coding: iso-8859-15 runs fine on an installed Python 2.4.3. I'll test this, it seems that the local installation misses some files then. thanks for the bug report and regards Uwe Yes, the real cause

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

TechTonics wrote: SH: System Python ran that script without any fixing, so that means Joost's local Python installed directory isn't fully functional. Because you can modify the script so that the shortcoming is not apparent is a workaround not a fix, IMO. Joost build the installer by using th

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

Uwe Stöhr wrote: TechTonics wrote: Joost's version of LyX1.4.2 created a subset of Python2.4.3 and installed it in a sub-directory of LyX even though I had system-wide Python2.4.3 installed and in Windows Path. This is then a bug. Python should only be installed when it isn't already on the

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

TechTonics wrote: Joost's version of LyX1.4.2 created a subset of Python2.4.3 and installed it in a sub-directory of LyX even though I had system-wide Python2.4.3 installed and in Windows Path. This is then a bug. Python should only be installed when it isn't already on the system. This bug i

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

Uwe Stöhr wrote: TechTonics wrote: Thank you, I look forward to trying it. It will probably avoid that minor Python bug. What Python bug? I've read that some of the upgrades to Miktex2.5 haven't gone well and the Miktex2.4 version is no longer available on its website. All older MiKTeX ve

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

TechTonics wrote: Thank you, I look forward to trying it. It will probably avoid that minor Python bug. What Python bug? I've read that some of the upgrades to Miktex2.5 haven't gone well and the Miktex2.4 version is no longer available on its website. All older MiKTeX versions are availab

Re: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

From: *Uwe Stöhr* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Date: Aug 7, 2006 3:23 AM Subject: [announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2 To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org <mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>, lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org <mailto:lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or

[announce] LyxWinInstaller with MiKTeX 2.5 and LyX 1.4.2

Hello LyXers, I just released version 2.5 of my LyX/LaTeX-Installer LyXWinInstaller. It can be downloaded frome here: https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=10626 the sourcecode from here: https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&rel