On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:00:24 -0700
Rob Oakes wrote:
> Hi Steve,
[clip]
> > One more question: You sure you want to go in-memory? What happens
> > if a guy has a 1200 page book with 100 chapters each containing 10
> > sections, each containing 10 subsections, and tries to parse it on
> > a machine
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:03:00 -0700
Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear eLyXer Users and Developers,
>
> I'm still at work on the import/export module for Microsoft Word
> documents. I'm making pretty good progress. I've got a rough
> prototype that works pretty well and I'm now starting to refine it.
>
> My
On Monday 08 June 2009 05:58:46 pm you wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:29:45 -0400
>
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My latest book has a layout based on the book document class. Even
> > when I uncheck "two sided document" it still prints a blank even page
> > if the preceding chapter ende
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 10:05 pm, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Matthias Bunk wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > in LyX-1.1.6 I wrote "\hyphenation{ bla-bla }" in the LaTeX preamble and
> > it works. But LyX-1.2.1 wrote "\usepackage{babel}" after the LaTeX
> > preamble and so the "\hyphenation{ bla-
On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:11 am, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear lists,
>
> I have just finished an enormous piece of work using LyX (my first
> *important* document done using LyX).
>
> I would like to express my deepest gratitude to those who have helped me
> in any way over the past few weeks.
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:47 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:30:02PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
> > Anyway, I've been a happy user of Lyx for 5 years and I could live with
> > the xforms junk for another 5 if need be. Lyx is _that_ good (currently
> > finishing my dissertat
On Monday 28 October 2002 12:16 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 04:42:18PM +, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote:
> > > won't hurt. And, as you all are probably tired of hearing me say, BY
> > > FAR the worst LyX deficiency is the lack of character styles, and
> > > that should be top p
On Monday 28 October 2002 01:40 am, you wrote:
> Just a small poll [As background: the Qt frontend is the single big item on
> the 1.3 list that's not done and won't be finished within the next few
> weeks.]
>
> What would _you_ prefer if you had the choice:
>
> (a) have 1.3.0 now as-is with its
