On Monday 29 April 2002 15:50, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Another one for people to have a look at!
>
> Jug
>
> P.S.: Q: Why are you sending all this simple patches to the list?
> A: I don't want to risk my "karma" commiting them :P
You are so afraid that you even forgot to send the
Hi,
following the usual procedure now, I send to list the patch that is docbook
related.
I know that I have several issues merged under the same roof, but most of it
are one liners.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/ChangeLog
==
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:07:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 30-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > And I still do not agree... Gcc 2.96 are working close to flawlessly
> | > for me. And a lot better than 2.95.2...
> |
> | I
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:08:33PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Jürgen (Jürgen who's putting on his gear for driving home with his
> motorcycle before it's going to rain again)
>
Out of topic, I know. This week the outside temperature has been over 30 C
all the days. Tha
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:09:36PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suppose that this request/patch is for jose. I suggest to have the
> xref support in LyX, when no name is given in the reference popup. When
> a name is provided the link element is used as usual.
You read my mind.
I had the sa
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:19:50AM +0200, ben wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit :
>
> > I should also look to the configuration schemes used by sgmltools and
> > db2xxx, since they use the entities that are usually packaged in a different
> > way.
> >
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:31:05AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> Why does it matter to you to use KDE and not Xforms? What is so
> pressing, so important that the GUI will be done in some other toolkit
> now and not in XForms?
First: I must be mad to answer this question. Believe me... :-)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:47:57PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> New update!
>
> People who did already confirm:
>
> - Asger
> - Jean-Marc
> - Lars
> - André and Konni
>
> (all of them on Friday 22)
>
> People who did say they will come but didn't confirm till now:
Oh yes, I did. With a
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 09:55:13AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 12-Jun-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > Oh yes, I did. With a flight ticket since the begin of May and you don't
> > count with me?
> >
> > I told you so...
>
>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:20:36AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > I'm sorry my wife offered me "Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden
> > > Braid" from Douglas R. Hofstadter, so I could not avoid it. ;-)
> >
> > Sounds like a great book. Perhaps you c
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:44:10PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> To keep you occupied...
[...]
> lyx->tex->lyx problems:
I'm working on some of this problems, using the User Guide as a test case.
The problems that I intend to solve are related to the preamble parse
since that is the part I know
One other question I would like ask is this:
What is the general form of a call to usepackage?
\usepackage[]{} or just \usepackage{}
--
José
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 04:07:16PM +0200, Roberto Arcomano wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> I use great LyX for Linux Documents, so LinuxDoc class document.
Usually linuxdoc was used for Linux Documentation Project documents, the
famous HOWTO. They are migrating to DocBook, that LyX also supports t
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:31:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose> Regarding \makeatleatletter and \makeatother where are they
> Jose> used and why?
>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:37:35AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Lars> The only reason I have for proposing the altered "LaTeX Layout"
> Lars> at all is to have it working in a similar way as before, but it
> Lars> is not really needed.
>
> Howerver, we have to work out a reasonable way
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Another question to floats. Could we assume that floats are allowed ONLY in
> top level paragraphs? (this means not inside a paragraph which is inside a
> InsetText?) This would make it easier to be sure that we don't missuse floa
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:57:31PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well what we really complained about was the background graphics. If it
> is green, blue or whatever other color I don't complain. But yes we could
> have it in blue as the suggestion of Edwin. The rest should have the exact
> same
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Well this could be fairly easy! If we could have a %%lyx-produced around
> this stuff it would be easy to skip it in the readback routine, as we KNOW
> that this stuff was produced by LyX and we don't need to interpret it!
>
> BT
Hi,
After all the exams are corrected and after three weeks of enclosure to
take care of it (and related issues) I finally had the chance to finish the
work that started in Bolzano, and I have the pleasure to announce that:
I have commited, in the CVS, some new code to improve the latex pream
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:55:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose> I have commited, in the CVS, some new code to improve the
> Jose> latex preamble. Hurrah!
&
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:05:04AM +0200, ben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jose, here is the config_xml script updated, that detects the available
> and needed things by using the catalog mechanisms. The constraint is
> that it needs an extra java archive, the advantage is that this method
> is 100% xml :-).
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:24:29PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>
Here the first natbib is unnecessary, and ilegal.
Also all the commas are wrong, just white space is enough.
>
>
just as Lars said it should be
>
>
>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> (btw. the same goes to everybody else too... if you don't want be to
> "just do it", you should to it yourselves.)
Ok, you are all warned that sooner I will convert all the instances of
docBook to docbook that "we" have cha
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:12:44PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > If not run from its directory (assuming LyX/reLyX is not installed), reLyX
> > doesn't know here to find the other files it
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 07:13:04PM +0200, ben wrote:
> > Ok, I'll have a look into it.
>
> Fine! I will soon release db2lyx that contains the script. Don't hesitate to
> make any remark.
I have been looking to reLyX, that is the older brother of db2lyx, and it
has a configure level that is
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 11:54:29PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> He thinks you should just change it.
My diagnose is that you have a severe case of multiple personalities. :-)
That explains clearly all those cases of "me", "I", "he" and "we". ;-)
> --
> Lgb
--
José
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:12:41PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit :
>
> > [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to
> >
> > keep java well installed and configured I will switch right now. :-)
>
> I&
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 06:00:43PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
[...]
> I'm not a hard-core LaTeXer so I don't know how suitable a maintainer I'd
> be. If the bugs are explained in detail I should be able to fix them, but
> bug reports relying on detailed knowledge of TeX will go unfixed.
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:04:52 +0200
> FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Feedback from www.lyx.org
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Jean-Daniel Dodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
> following feedback message on the LyX home page:
> ---
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 09:20:31AM +0200, jdd wrote:
> Le Samedi 18 Août 2001 00:13, vous avez écrit :
>
> > How far away is it from being usable for LDP Authors?
Feedback is always welcome.
> I think LyX is right now usable to LDP authors. With the help of David
> Merrill I could fix the
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 06:20:16PM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> First, thank you very much for the work you're doing. The LDP is
> looking forward to being able to use and recommend Lyx for our
> authors, and so we have been following the DocBook development,
> although I haven't
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:49:55PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > Agreed, there is no way to pass this info to docbook. Or we could take
> > care of that with the new code. Is that feasible? (Baruch)
>
> The new code can probably be extended to do it, but I'd rather not do it
> for this version
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:52:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The best thing to do if you want this fixed in the next version is to
> > hunt the DocBook commands to do what is needed and to post them for
> > whatever feature we are missing from DocBook.
>
> We also need to disable in dialogs fe
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:57:21AM +0200, ben wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit :
>
> > [...]
> >
> > > I will try to see how to use it to detect where the NW's DocBook XSLs are for the
> > > db2lyx config (same as the java catalog classes use
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:50:21AM +0200, ben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For those who are interested, the release 0.1.3 of the DB2LyX
> stylesheets is available at http://perso.libertysurf.fr/bgu/#DB2LyX
Ok, I got it.
> The main changes are:
>
> * New support of xsltproc (catalog resolver + config
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:58:15PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > PS: I have come recently from vacations... I now can claim to now more
> > than 50 castles in Portugal...
> Sounds like book material to me.
> Garst
Actually it
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:23:46PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
> Module name: lyx-devel
> Repository: lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/08/28 22:23:46
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/lib/: ChangeLog
> lyx-devel
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following message if I start reLyX:
>
> Can't locate reLyXmain.pl in @INC (@INC contains:
> /home/schmitt/Programme/lyx-1.2.0cvs-sol/bin
> /opt/local/perl5.004/lib/5.00502/sun4-solaris
> /opt/local/perl5.004/lib
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:28:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > > Can't locate reLyXmain.pl in @INC (@INC contains:
> > > /home/schmitt/Programme/lyx-1.2.0cvs-sol/bin
> > > /opt/local/perl5.0
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:48:28PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > 305 if( $Latex_Preamble =~ /\\geometry\{(.*)\}/) {
> > 306 my $geom_options = $1;
> >
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:16:09PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> If you ask so:
>
> - reLyXmain.pl: 97 \\documentclass, not \documentclass
That one was running from me, everytime I saw the warning I looked to the
previous \\documentclass and that is ok. :-)
> - many regexes: you could libera
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > 305 if( $Latex_Preamble =~ /\\geometry\{(.*)\}/) {
> > 306 my $geom_options = $1;
> > 307 my $op;
> > 308 foreach $op (keys %Geometry_Options) {
> > 309 $geom_options =~ s/$op//
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:18:49PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 04:50:48PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > > I'm pretty sure that the problem here is that you&
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:01:27PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> Friday, finally!
>
> It's time for an updated bug list (with 64 entries!)
Michael do you have problems with the last reLyX?
What was the symbolic link that you added wednesday to fix it?
> Michael
>
> --
>
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:41:20AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> who does the release announcements (updating freshmeat etc.)
I guess that no one. :-)
I have updated some versions, but I noticed last week that the stable
version announced there is still fix2.
> I just added lyx to www.openso
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > Michael do you have problems with the last reLyX?
> >
> > What was the symbolic link that you added wednesday to fix it?
>
> I made s
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 01:02:41PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> [snip]
> > >
> > > Yeah, that's OK too.
> >
> > Actually I have choosen your alternative, I really dislike t
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:20:40PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:17:38PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > Do you have any idea why Michael has problems with the reLyX path detection?
>
> Hmm. Michael, I don't understan
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:55:45PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:45:16PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
>
> FOUND!
>
> diff -u -p -r1.5 reLyX.in
> --- lib/reLyX//reLyX.in 2001/08/31 07:54:05 1.5
> +++ lib/reLyX//r
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:09:20AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:45:16PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > You can add a __cal__ method to a class making it a functor, and using it
> > everywhere a function can be used.
>
> Ah - well,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > I have commited, ok I'll do it after this message.
> > *Please* Michael tell me that now this works! *Please*!
>
> GOOD NEWS:
>
&g
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:01:31PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
[...]
> > You can add a __cal__ method to a class making it a functor, and using it
> > everywhere a function can be used. I don't even dream it how to do it in
> > perl... ;-)
>
> I'm *not* trying to start a flame war here. I'll poin
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:01:03PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > Thank you Yves for restoring my mental health...
>
> Come on, Jose. We don't buy that after all this time.
> How can any
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 11:23:41AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> Can't you use
>
> Dekel> Style SubSection ObsoletedBy Subsection End
>
> I thought about it, and decided not to do it becasue it would still
> appear in t
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show
> up on the View Ps.
> CVS current
They must follow a precise order to be printed. There is some
documentation about that. Also look to the example file.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:04:59PM +0200, ben wrote:
> > > For those who are interested, the release 0.1.3 of the DB2LyX
> > > stylesheets is available at http://perso.libertysurf.fr/bgu/#DB2LyX
Several points, I didn't review all the package:
1) Although I would like to see sgml2xml.py a
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 06:31:29PM +0200, Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Couple of questions, rather technical in nature:
This should preferable be discussed in the devel mailling list. So I have
transfered it here.
> (1) Would it be much of a technical problem to include an expor
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on
> the drop down list are My Address and Send To Address.
> cc etc went missing.
It makes sense now. Please blame Jean-Marc.
Since he will only see this on f
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> >
> > > I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on
> > >
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:43:06PM +0200, Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
> Hi Jose,
> I was thinking of an easy way to migrate LyX data into a more
> LyX-specific XML flavour that allows for easier integration of
> LaTeX-specific features into the XML that DocBook does.
The convertion of lyx file fo
I guess that the real destination is the list and not me.
--
José
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show
> > up on the View P
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 07:25:47PM +0200, ben wrote:
[.. 1 ..]
Do you have sgml2xml installed?
[.. 2 ..]
> > 3) You have also a outlyx directory, the same reasoning as above. The same
> > applies to the html files, they should be available for those who want it in
> > the ftp or http sites. T
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Jean Marc,
Hi Michael,
> I have seen that you removed a lot of "Latex" entries in the layout files.
>
> I started a global "grep" on the whole lyx-devel tree. AFAICS the
> following files need to be updated as well:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:50:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I am currently removing the bogus use of the Latex tag in all the
> letter classes and in egs.layout. What remains is the use in DocBook
> classes for the SGML layouts. So the question now is: should we revive
> the defunct L
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jose> Does it means "pass the text literally and ignore other font
> Jose> information"?
>
> Yes.
Good, I will soon remove the latex font from docbook layout files using
this.
> Jose> Regarding the support for Verbat
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:48:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
> Jose> [Jean-Marc or any other volunteer] Would it be difficult to
> Jose> move the style to SGML (or Raw if we rename it that way) every
> Jose> time the user inserts an include inset?
>
> This is probably not the rig
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:53:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So it means that an inset should have a way to tell that it wants to
> be output outside any current paragraph... You could add a new method
> to inset.h and honor it in the docbook output code. I am not sure
> whether this co
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:10:00AM +0200, ben wrote:
> I've tried the Clark's sgml2xml. I'm a bit disappointed:
> * the XML output is really ugly, and in my opinion it cannot be seen as a decent
> XML export result.
Probably too old.
> * with a multi-parts document, it produces a single fil
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:21:38AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > This explains why it reverts to Standard, by default the new paragraph
> > goes to Standard.
> Actually, it goes to the first type in the .layout file, which in
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:22:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Do you see what I mean? DYSWIM
> >
> Not here. I get this
> Angus
> #LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
> \lyxformat 220
Ok. We are not crazy and the fine print is that I tested this using
1.1
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose> Why does lyx forces the style to be standard when inserting an
> Jose> include inset?
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:06:44PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Here is a minor release, that fixes the following points:
>
> * Possibility to select the XSLT used by the Makefiles. XT, Xalan and xsltproc are
> supported. By default xsltproc is used.
Good.
> * Some XSL changes so that xsltproc works
One problem.
The content of my catalog file is:
-- AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED, DO NOT EDIT --
CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/entities/iso-entities-8879.1986/iso-entities.cat"
CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/3.1/docbook.cat"
CATALOG "/usr/share/sgml/stylesheets/docbook/catalog"
CATALOG "/
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:35:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Is that only with docbook documents (I do not have the relevant tools,
> so I do not have docbook claases installed)? I cannot reproduce it.
There is nothing specific to docbook classes here.
> Maybe am I just stupid (s
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote:
> No, it should work since xsltproc (well, libxml2) understands both SGML and XML
> catalog syntax. In my local config it works. I think the problem is that the
> public IDs expected by db2lyx are not defined (or not well defined) in one of
> t
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:31:46PM +0200, ben wrote:
Hi Ben,
after correcting the path in refentry.dtd I have succefully run the
makefile in doc/.
I have problems with docbook-xml 4.1, but not with 4.1.2.
--
José
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote:
[...]
> Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions?
I prefer 2) also. And as far as I know there isn't a cleanner way to do it.
> BG
--
José
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:17AM +0200, ben wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit :
>
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:07:07AM +0200, ben wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Personaly I prefer solution 2. What do you think? Have you seen other solutions?
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:37:01AM +0200, ben wrote:
>
> > I think that we can start integrating the config phase of db2lyx with lyx.
> >
> > Also one of my goals, the same that motivated my work with relyx
> > previously, is to be able to run db2lyx from the source directory.
> > Although
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:54:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> Nahh... but an dropdown to select what kind of message perhaps?
>
> Lars> Praise Question Flame
>
> And what would be the effect of this choice?
M
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:44:36PM +0200, ben wrote:
[...]
> > Have you been able to recompile using Angus tip's?
>
> Yes it works fine. My problem now is that there are troubles with the layouts.
> First, a general question: it seems that the raw style (that used to be LaTeX
> style) for a who
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 01:42:12PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
[...]
> I think the simplest way is just to copy and paste it in.
> (I wonder if "main::my_fast_abs_path(...)" would work?)
I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
I'm trying to add language support to reLyX
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:56:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:56:06AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
>
> Since you seem to work on reLyX, could you tell me what math
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:20:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> x^2 is fine in current mathed, and so is '$...$', '$$...$$' and '\cal'.
I can do that.
What else?
> > After that stage all the latex math code is passed untouched to mathed.
>
> Would be nice if all math remains untouch
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 05:26:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Create a new math formula with: "C-m" (I think with CUA; with emacs
> bindings, it is M-m m). Then M-m space creates a space inset, and
> each subsequent space toggles between available spaces. Also, in the
> math panel, th
Hi,
In src/LaTeXFeatures.C we have:
string const LaTeXFeatures::getMacros() const
{
ostringstream macros;
// always include this
if (true || lyx)
macros << lyx_def << '\n';
Why? This always outputs the definition of \LyX even if it is not used.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:08:34PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suggest the following patch to have the entity when a protected
> space is used:
I have commited a very modified version of your patch, to consider all the
other special chars. Tell me if you like it. Also the same goes to linu
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:39:27PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> I will commit it as soon as it compiles.
Done now. It was a really long compile. ;-)
--
José
This question is probably for Juergen.
Why the long tables arguments get a negative value? Like this
... endhead="-3" endfirsthead="-3" endfoot="-3" endlastfoot="-3" ...
When some code is both a header and a footer?
Best regards,
--
José
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:04:28PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Ben, I think this discussion is better suited for the lyx-devel so I
have move it to here.
> I would like that when a table is created the SGML output can contain a
> , especially when long tables are used.
I have done that. The
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 01:47:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> It would probably be a good idea to get rid of this, indeed. After
> 1.2.0, that is :) However, we will need to support backward
> compatibility filters for this...
Ok, I agree. More and more make sense the filter project
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
[...]
> It REALLY looks good. IMO we should change the ERT inset to this
> type. Please I would like to hear opinions from others too! We would have
> a nicer editor. On the other hand people who complained that they would like
> to se
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:44:26PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:04:28PM +0200, ben wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Ben, I think this discussion is better suited for the lyx-devel so I
> have move it to here.
[...]
> > What do you think ?
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:57:03AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
[...]
> > I agree with Jürgen. It looks prety, but I am one of the people who would
> > like to see a inline version, if possible, as we have now.
>
> have a look at attac
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:09:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 23-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > While in the docbook model you can have how many head rows and foot rows
> > you want to.
>
> Same in LaTeX!
Ok.
> > My solut
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:03:40AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 23-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > This question is probably for Juergen.
> > Why the long tables arguments get a negative value? Like this
> > ... endhead="-3" endfirsthead
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:52:14AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > I have decided that they are the same since there isn't any distintion
> > between them in docbook.
>
> So in docbook you don't have
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:56:44AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Well you have to know how LaTeX work to be able to understand this :)
We want also, as long as possible, spare the user to the latex details.
And in this case that is very easy.
I read the longtable.dvi that comes with tetex
Hi Dekel (this is probably to you),
if I set the flags in the configuration file for the convertion
docbook->html to
resultdir=$$b,resultfile=t1.html
the preview work as it should. I view the html and the right file is shown.
But when I try to export it to html, I have p
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
[...]
>
> I know I'm too good sometimes ;)
That's too kind of you. ;-)
> > You could provide more visual feedback for header and footer, say with
> > bold fonts. Those are the visual expectations we have related to both of
> > t
1 - 100 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
