Re: MikTeX 2.8

2009-09-03 Thread Joost Verburg
Uwe Stöhr wrote: When I find the time, I'll try to build a portable LyX. (I don't know if this is possible because LyX uses many other third-party programs that might not be ready for that.) It should be no problem. The Ghostscript and ImageMagick files that are included in my installers are

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

2009-09-07 Thread Joost Verburg
Andre Poenitz wrote: What was the system Qt version shipped with the Windows distribution? 4.5.2 Joost

Re: eLyXer integration, round two

2009-09-15 Thread Joost Verburg
Alex Fernandez wrote: A few things ;) As Uwe has explained above, Windows integration with the executable does not work well due to a bug in the shell, so when LyX calls eLyXer on Windows as: > elyxer.py --directory "directory path" "input file.lyx" "output file.html" eLyXer does not receive p

Re: eLyXer integration, round two

2009-09-16 Thread Joost Verburg
Alex Fernandez wrote: Note that I was not able to reproduce Uwe's issue with spaces in document paths (when we both had Windows XP on our test machines). That is why I think it is a bug in his particular version of XP. I don't think it's a Windows bug. Maybe the file association on one of your

Re: Error in Imagemagick included in LyX installation (Windows)

2009-10-13 Thread Joost Verburg
Uwe Stöhr wrote: Very strange because my installer includes the Imagemagick files without any changes. It might be that the ImageMagick version that I included has a bug that only affects a few systems like yours. (You are the first one reporting that ImageMagick fails.) Did you include the c

Re: How I can add a new button to the tool bar?

2010-02-03 Thread Joost Verburg
On 2/3/2010 1:32 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote: the current icons are also known by the users to be butt-ugly and give a very amateurish first impression (so i've been told) personally i'd change them in an instant for something consistent and better looking. +1 The current icons look old and are so

Re: about the libintl version in the LyX windows installer

2010-02-04 Thread Joost Verburg
On 2/3/2010 7:34 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I also found other Windows sources of gettext 0.17 for Windows and could compile the intl.dll from the sources. The problem is that my compiled intl.dll won't link with your LyX Windows package and all my attempts to change the source code to make it link fai

Re: about the libintl version in the LyX windows installer

2010-02-06 Thread Joost Verburg
On 2/6/2010 10:10 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Are you sure you actually have gettext code that is compatible with MSVC? Yes, see the link I referenced in my initial post. These packages are used to compile GTK with gettext using MSVC. I furthermore send you a Zip-package in a private mail (too big f

Re: about the libintl version in the LyX windows installer

2010-02-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 2/7/2010 10:25 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I found another repository that includes an MSVC project file. That's the ZIP-file I sent you. (Unfortunately I cannot find the link to it any longer.) Looks like I didn't receive it. Could you try to send it again? Thx. > I remember trying this one bef

1.6.5 mathed crash

2010-02-08 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi, I was just typing some math and 1.6.5 crashed with the following assertion: lyx-1.6.5\src\support\lassert.cpp(21): ASSERTION pos < size() VIOLATED IN lyx-1.6.5\src\mathed\MathData.cpp:56 Does anyone know whether this may be related to a known bug (I couldn't find this assertion in trac)?

Re: about the libintl version in the LyX windows installer

2010-02-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 2/8/2010 7:40 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Looks like I didn't receive it. Could you try to send it again? Thx. I uploaded it now: http://www.fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/libintl-0.17-windows-3.zip I don't see a MSVC project for gettext itself in there, just a sample MSVC application that uses gettext.

Re: about the libintl version in the LyX windows installer

2010-02-09 Thread Joost Verburg
On 2/9/2010 8:34 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I'm afraid I won't have time to look into this now. It is not that pressing, but having this fixed for LyX 2.0 would be good. I know, but I think it's not going to be easy to make gettext 0.17 MSVC compatible. > If the LyX problem is caused by a kn

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/8/2010 6:06 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: (A newer version of gettext is not yet available for Windows, that's also the reason why changing the LyX menu language doesn't work on Windows via the preferences menu. Joost is working on that and I cannot update gettext until he finished this work.) i

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/8/2010 11:42 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: AFAIK it hasn't been confirmed that the language setting is also broken with gettext 0.15 on Linux, so I'm not sure whether this is a gettext I'm really getting confused. The LyX 1.6.5 binary for windows allows me to choose a different u

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/8/2010 11:57 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: You're right, it works fine for me too! I have no idea why it's not working on Uwe's system, maybe it's because of the different installer. However, I can confirm it doesn't work if I compile LyX myself. Do you do some magic when com

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/9/2010 1:16 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: But you still have no success. But why is it working ofr Abdel and Joost but not for use. I have no idea right now, because Abdel uses CMake, Joost uses Scons. So the build system cannot be the reason. The installer can also not be the reason because this is

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/8/2010 7:41 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I'm a bit puzzled because we discusses the gettext problem several times and everybody on Windows could reproduce this, also you if I remember correctly. I never tried to reproduce the bug myself. Joost

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/9/2010 1:13 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Besides this, Joost, I think that you are also using SCons to compile LyX. Or do you now use CMake? Correct. I'm using SCons. Joost

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/10/2010 4:31 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Which version of intl.dll? intl.dll 0.15.0 dating back from april 2008 iconv.dll 1.11.0 dating back from april 2008 I use the same versions, but dating from December 2007. The Dec 2007 version is indeed the latest one, so you got the right intl.dll.

Re: Some technical details

2010-03-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/10/2010 3:30 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What is your Qt-version? 4.6.0 MSVC binaries from Nokia. I hadn't noticed yet that Qt is now providing MSVC binaries as well. That's very convenient. Are there any known issues with Qt 4.6 and the current 1.6 branch? Joost

Re: Some technical details - bug fixed

2010-03-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/10/2010 9:55 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I therefore created the workaround using a batch file (lyx.bat) where I reset the LANG variable before loading LyX. I think it may be better to put this in an application like the LyXLauncher that I made for my installer. AFAIK with a batch file you get

Re: Some technical details - bug fixed

2010-03-11 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/11/2010 8:34 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I already use LyXLauncher. I only invented the batch file that calls LyXLauncher, to avoid the LANG variable issue. When LANG is not set on a PC, your solution works fine. When it is set, I don't have another idea than to remove it when installing LyX. But t

LyX 2.0 / Windows

2010-03-13 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi all, Today I've looked at some of the upcoming features for LyX 2.0. It looks really impressive and I think it creates an opportunity to improve the Windows releases. Let me explain. Currently in LyX 1.6, the language features are provided using Aspell/Aiksaurus, which is a bit of a dead

Re: LyX 2.0 / Windows

2010-03-14 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/14/2010 3:58 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Forget about Enchant on Windows it brings in gtk dependency and we don't want to maintain that. I've specifically introduced libhunspell so that we can reuse OpenOffice and/or Firefox dictionaries. I have created an hunspell MSVC solution to generate

Re: LyX 2.0 / Windows

2010-03-14 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/14/2010 5:30 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: unfortunatelly MikTeX installation is imho the main cause of troubles on win instalations because of its download which take place only when lyx is run. Yes, that's why the installer configures LyX after MiKTeX is installed. This will remain the same.

Re: LyX 2.0 / Windows

2010-03-15 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/15/2010 9:43 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Not everyone uses Firefox or OpenOffice, so I think we should not rely > on the dictionaries installed by other applications. But what if they are already installed at LyX installation time? Quite frankly, when I am on Windows, I hate having to

Re: LyX 2.0 / Windows

2010-03-15 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/15/2010 11:33 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: This is not about disk space. This is about not doing the same operation a fourth 4 time... I agree that the setup should be as easy as possible; we could develop a wizard that allows you to simply check which dictionaries to download. A method

Re: How to build LyX using CMake?

2010-03-22 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/22/2010 11:34 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I want to switch from SCons to CMake. Reading the file "INSTALL.cmake" I see that this file is outdated (it tells me that I should install MSVC 2005). Do we have a more recent description how to use CMake? Besides this, in the "INSTALL.cmake" I read that

Re: Issues wrt LyX 2.0 for Windows

2010-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/25/2010 2:27 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: The aim of both installers is to install a fully functional LyX version and to keep the tricky LaTeX-package handling away from new users. (As the first installation of LaTeX needs some times, my installer shows a console Window with the LaTeX-installation p

Re: Issues wrt LyX 2.0 for Windows

2010-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/25/2010 4:18 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: there has been small hint that at least the official installer would be somewhat refactorized. please would it be possible that you at least _try_ to cooperate on one single code, resulting in a single installer for windows? I proposed a new approach (se

Re: Issues wrt LyX 2.0 for Windows

2010-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/25/2010 4:26 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: while i understand all the arguments above, the new win installs on friends computers is somewhat embarassing because of it literally takes ages. the main reason is miktex online updates. couldn't we ship those latex packages, slip them into proper dirs af

Re: How to build LyX using CMake?

2010-03-25 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/25/2010 5:13 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 24.03.2010, 05:18 +0100 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: :: clean devenv lyx.sln /clean Release I'm not sure if denenv is part of the Express version of VC. It's not. You can probably replace devenv with VCExpress. Joost

Re: Issues wrt LyX 2.0 for Windows

2010-03-30 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/30/2010 3:03 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I therefore plan to continue my installer. Developers, if you vote not to mention my installer anymore on the LyX homepage, then be it. I'm only asking to be allowed to keep it in SVN. Did you read the thread I started earlier about the Windows 2.0 instal

Re: LyX 2.0 / Windows - OK to start the work right now

2010-03-30 Thread Joost Verburg
On 3/30/2010 3:34 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: At first, I apologize the delay in replying to this thread. I support your ideas for a unified and new installer, see below: Great! If we write it new from scratch and everyone interested is involved, I'm on board to use the result as official installer

Re: result of a first test with LyX 2.0alpha2

2010-04-18 Thread Joost Verburg
On 4/18/2010 11:28 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: alpha2 is much more stable than alpha1 but there are still some issues: Did you use cmake to compile alpha2? I just tried that but I get many link errors like: lyxcore.obj : error LNK2005: "bool __cdecl lyx::author_smaller(class lyx::Author const &,cla

Re: result of a first test with LyX 2.0alpha2

2010-04-18 Thread Joost Verburg
On 4/18/2010 7:15 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Did you use cmake to compile alpha2? I use CMake for debug builds. For release builds I prefer SCons because it also takes care of LyX's lib files and the po-files. I don't have compile problems with CMake. Are you able to build the alpha2 tarball usi

Re: result of a first test with LyX 2.0alpha2

2010-04-19 Thread Joost Verburg
On 4/19/2010 2:49 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/19/2010 05:34 AM, Joost Verburg wrote: On 4/18/2010 7:15 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Did you use cmake to compile alpha2? I use CMake for debug builds. For release builds I prefer SCons because it also takes care of LyX's lib files an

Re: Spellchecker and thesaurus for LyX/Mac

2010-04-20 Thread Joost Verburg
And I would integrate it more into the LyX application. One of my goals is to make the installer for Mac obsolete. It'd be great to have a platform-independent dictionary/thesaurus installation wizard. Are you still planning to use Aspell for the LyX 2.0 Mac installers? On Windows I'm trying

Re: result of a first test with LyX 2.0alpha2

2010-04-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 4/18/2010 7:15 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: I don't have compile problems with CMake. Just to make sure, did you compile the tarball or did you checkout the alpha2 revision from SVN? SVN checkouts work fine for me, but I can't compile the alpha1 and alpha2 tarballs. Joost

Re: MSVC compilation problem

2010-05-21 Thread Joost Verburg
On 5/21/2010 4:21 PM, Niels Gierse wrote: I had a great experience using Lyx for my Diploma Thesis (~Master) in Physics. As this convinced me of Lyx I want to give a little bit back. Thus I added a couple of bugs/requests in the bug tracker. To take a look at the source I followed the instruct

Re: Code Review: Next step to provide spellchecker with dictionaries included

2010-06-02 Thread Joost Verburg
On 5/28/2010 4:31 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: 3. system support directory - there will the shipped data files live. Is this the LyX library directory? So the dictionaries / thesaurus lists could be stored in e.g. "Resources\dict" and "Resources\thes" on Windows? Joost

lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

2010-06-02 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi all, I was wondering how I can make paths in e.g. the path_prefix in lyxrc.dist relative to the LyX installation directory? For example, instead of, \path_prefix "C:\Program Files (x86)\LyX16\dir" something like: \path_prefix "%LYXDIR%\dir" I'm trying to make LyX/Windows more portable a

Re: lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

2010-06-09 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/9/2010 10:17 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: One solution would be to make relative paths relative to lyxdir (and maybe userdir too). Would that make sense to you? Yes, that makes perfect sense. It will make the Windows installer less complicated and allow for a portable version to be cre

[Patch] Windows process creation

2010-06-17 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi, Currently we're using a wrapper application (LyXLauncher) on Windows to hide the command prompt windows that keep popping up when LyX starts external applications for e.g. image conversion. These windows appear due to the different concept of GUI/console applications on Windows. However,

Re: [Patch] Windows process creation

2010-06-17 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/17/2010 5:17 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: I don't know whether Windows 7 broke something in this respect, but once the console is hidden, launching external applications should not pop up any console windows. It is so at least with Vista. The problem is that the application to launch LyX (

Re: [Patch] Windows process creation

2010-06-18 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/18/2010 3:32 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Is this launcher also needed when you build LyX as GUI app? (cmake option -Dnoconsole=1) Yes. The command windows still pop up when LyX is build as a GUI app. With this patch, LyX can be build as a GUI app without the need for any launchers. Joost

Re: [Patch] Windows process creation

2010-06-18 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/17/2010 9:00 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: So, this patch does not help in this respect, as the launcher is needed for hiding the initial console that would otherwise open. I think that the solution could be hiding the console from inside LyX itself. Once there was code for doing that, but I

Re: [Patch] Windows process creation

2010-06-18 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/18/2010 2:00 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Wouldn't be the cleanest solution to use QProcess also for ForkedCalls? (Enrico, I hear you scream ;) Yes, the Systemcall code in LyX doesn't create any console windows because QProcess internally sets the CREATE_NO_WINDOW flag. I'm just doing the sa

Re: [Patch] Windows process creation

2010-06-19 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/19/2010 5:49 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: Maybe because they serve different purposes? I don't think that changing something without having a clear understanding of why it is as it is and only because it seems cool using QProcess, is the way to go. Remember the mantra: if it ain't broke, don

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.7 [status update #1]

2010-06-28 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/28/2010 2:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: #6647Lyx does not pin correctly to the Windows 7 taskbar (AFAIU Joost is working on this -- status?) Yes, I'm working on this for 2.0. LyX will be compiled as a real GUI app without a separate launcher. I don't think backporting to branch is

Re: r34721 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support

2010-06-29 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/29/2010 7:36 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: +#include why this is not ifdefed? pavel I didn't realize io.h is Windows specific. I'll fix it. Joost

Re: r34732 - lyx-devel/trunk

2010-06-30 Thread Joost Verburg
On 6/30/2010 11:23 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: I was wondering: does it make sense to handle msvc in autotools? Can it even work? I do not mind keeping it, but only if on person somewhere can use it. AFAIK it's not possible to use MSVC with autotools. Joost

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-02 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/2/2010 3:37 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I tried to incorporate some thesaurus files from OpenOffice. It seems like the file format has changed and is incompatible now. So the old thesaurus .idx and .dat files are found but not valid and then LyX crashes. To avoid this I added the checks above

Re: r34721 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support

2010-07-03 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/2/2010 9:08 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi Joost, Where can I specify this option? I cannot find any further documentation of this new compilation option. Where do we document them? thanks and regards Uwe Compiling LyX as a GUI app can be done with CMake using the noconsole option. Regards J

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-03 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/3/2010 5:18 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Do you made the collection manually? I noticed some outdated files in it. Mythes needs the version 2 thesaurus files. They are named like "th*_v2.idx" etc. E. g. the spanish and french thesaurus in your zip file is not usable therefore. I think we have t

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-04 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/4/2010 9:16 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Hmm... then I have to check again why it crashed here. While studying the code I was not surprised about the crash. OTOH the version 2 files are available. Perhaps one can decide to use them anyway. Where did you find the v2 files? It could be that the

Re: r34721 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support

2010-07-04 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/4/2010 3:33 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: How about making it really an cmake-option? It should displays on the cmake-gui too. Don't know if it makes any differences on windows though. Sure. I think we should also rename the LyX CMake options to LYX_* so they will be grouped together. Joost

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-04 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/4/2010 1:04 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: So I'm really baffled that the mythes code in LyX can deal with the old file format. The parser starts unconditionally with reading first line as encoding, second line as no. of lines and allocates 0 index entries (because of converting "Alá,24" results

Re: r34721 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support

2010-07-04 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/4/2010 1:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Hmm, we have already following options: lyxinstall noconsole disable-pch disable-pch debug_glibc debug_glibc_pedantic UseExternalBoost We could rename them to e.g. lyx-install lyx-noconsole lyx-disable-pch lyx-disable-pch debug-glibc deb

Re: opions-renaming in cmake

2010-07-05 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/5/2010 7:38 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: To have options in a group I wolud like to add a prefix to options for cmake-build. lyxinstall -> LYX_install UseExternalBoost -> LYX_UseExternalBoost disable-pch -> LYX_disable-pch Peter, Joost, do you mind to accept followi

Re: opions-renaming in cmake

2010-07-06 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/6/2010 1:42 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: Very well. Done for all used options. What about GNUWIN32_DIR? Could this be renamed to LYX_DEPENDENCIES_DIR or something similar? There are some others like nls -> LYX_NLS, noconsole -> LYX_NO_CONSOLE, UseVersionSuffix -> LYX_USE_VERSION_SUFFIX. I thi

Re: lyxrc.dist: Path relative to installation directory

2010-07-06 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/6/2010 9:57 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: I did not completely forget you. What are the directories that you need to add the path, actually? The bindir is already added, but I suspect that it is not in the right form. It would be nice to keep e.g. Python and ImageMagick in a separate di

Re: opions-renaming in cmake

2010-07-06 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/6/2010 2:24 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Done. Added aspell (=LYX_ASPELL) to the set of option-variables too. Set the group of options at the same place in CMakeLists.txt. Great! I think you missed the GNUWIN32_DIR? Maybe this one could become an option as well. I would suggest LYX_DEPENDENCIES

Re: opions-renaming in cmake

2010-07-06 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/6/2010 4:00 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: GNUWIN32_DIR is not an boolean option, it's defined by a Find-Package module. So we should rename and patch FindGNUWIN32.cmake. But this package is maybe also part of cmake, have to check. I've recently created native and up-to-date MSVC versions of all

Re: New patch for native spell checker on mac os (was Re: Looking for Spellcheckers Name)

2010-07-06 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/6/2010 5:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan what is the plan about the dictionaries? do you plan to include them all into the installer? 0.5 GB for each release looks quite big... Is this dmg uncompressed? A zip with Hunspell dictionaries for all supported languages is only about 30 MB.

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-07 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/7/2010 1:36 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: The dictionaries for hunspell and the thesauri are openoffice work. AFAIK there many different open source projects that maintain dictionaries for a certain language and they are usually the ones who create the OpenOffice extensions and submit them for

Re: opions-renaming in cmake

2010-07-07 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/7/2010 5:51 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Cool! Do you plan to create a zip which contains all the libs for a special compiler, something like lyx_dependencies_msvc10.zip? msvc10 here means it's compiled against the MSVC 2010 CRT, which I used for all dependencies. You can still use them with

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/8/2010 6:20 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: ok lets do this. i would crete new svn module dictionaries and put them into "dictionaries/openoffice/thesaurus". opinions? I'm not sure we will get all dictionaries/thesauri from OpenOffice extensions. Sometimes there are more recent version available e

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/8/2010 6:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: yes, fine. will you do it? pavel You want to create a new SVN module, right? It's probably better if you do this. Joost

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-09 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/9/2010 8:25 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: The repository is created. I guess you should create a trunk/ branches/ structure in it. I don't think we need different branches for dictionaries. Perhaps the structure could be dicts/ thes/ ? Joost

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-09 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/9/2010 11:27 AM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: Are we sure that file formats are not going to evolve? Do we plan eventually to allow users to download these dictionaries on the fly? Maybe thes/mythes2/ and dicts/hunspell1/ ? I'm thinking about just bundling all of them. There have been many

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-09 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/9/2010 1:31 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: thats up to you. but bundling is pretty orthogonal to the current svn activity. my plan was write trivial makefile which will just zip all files into one archive which we put on ftp. that would be the reference point for partricular lyx versions... i have

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday. I'm getting compi

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-10 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default. There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could not test it. Does it work? The tr1 errors are fixed now when using CMake.

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-11 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/11/2010 5:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits? Yes. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-11 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/11/2010 10:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out (waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release 1.6.7 after these problems are solved. The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-11 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/11/2010 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball? No, there's still another compile error. See my previous message. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-11 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/ ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/ This in

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-12 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/12/2010 9:17 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: New tarball is to be found at the usual location. CMake still doesn't work. I'm getting a lot of errors. Trying SCons now. Joost

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-12 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/12/2010 8:47 PM, Joost Verburg wrote: Trying SCons now. Also doesn't work. src\frontends\qt4\GuiCommandBuffer.cpp(319) : error C2668: 'lyx::copy_if' : ambiguous call to overloaded function Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-12 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Very nice! Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it. Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE. > I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependenc

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 2:43 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: somehow it eats the dot before '.inc' Not just the dot. It's eating other characters here somewhere else in the string. Joost

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 10:25 AM, Joost Verburg wrote: On 7/13/2010 2:43 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: somehow it eats the dot before '.inc' Not just the dot. It's eating other characters here somewhere else in the string. For example here: Jost/LyX/lyx-1.6.7/lib/layouts/theorems-starred-

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: 'lyx::copy_if' in line 316 of GuiCommandBuffer.cpp is not part of the tarballs. Seems you've somehow used trunk code. I'm using the tarball, but somehow the line number if off here. I get a lot of other errors as well, such as: lyx\lyx-1.6.7\src\mathed

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 10:44 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Do you use the merged build? I've not tested it for several weeks. Yes, LYX_MERGE_FILES is enabled in CMake. I will disable it and try again. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 4:22 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more? I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects which I really do not ne

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 10:44 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Do you use the merged build? I've not tested it for several weeks. OK so I got it to compile by: * Disabling merged build * Moving my files to C:\ to shorten the path I think this should definitely be fixed for 1.6.8 but maybe we can go ahead now wit

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/13/2010 6:12 PM, Joost Verburg wrote: I think this should definitely be fixed for 1.6.8 but maybe we can go ahead now with 1.6.7. Just discovered another issue. The user directory suffix for the 1.6 series has always been "16" (directory called lyx16), while CMake sets

Re: r34877 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/development

2010-07-14 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/14/2010 8:24 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Done. The new tarballs are on the server. Let's hope for the best. Thanks for all your help. The installers have been uploaded to the usual location (incoming on devel). They come with all the latest goodies like Qt 4.6.3, gettext 0.18, libiconv

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-15 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/9/2010 1:33 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: it seem quite unprobable but why not, trunk dir above does not cost anything. How should we proceed with the new dictionaries module? Are all the dictionaries and thesaurus lists going into dictionaries/trunk or should there be two subdirectories like d

Re: r34742 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/mythes

2010-07-15 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/15/2010 12:39 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: separating them is probably better idea. btw Joost are you able to reproduce http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6818 on your system? Yes, I can reproduce. I'm compiling a debug version. Joost

Re: confusion of tongues

2010-07-31 Thread Joost Verburg
On 7/30/2010 8:47 AM, Edwin Leuven wrote: i just updated lyx to 1.6.7-3 and now my ui language is suddenly french even though my settings are English: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/359550/lyxlang.jpg anyone else experienced this? I was able to reproduce. A new version of libiconv seems to fix this

Wiki password

2010-08-01 Thread Joost Verburg
Could someone send me the password for editing protected pages on the wiki? Thanks, Joost

Re: changeset/35060 - color regressions

2010-08-08 Thread Joost Verburg
On 8/7/2010 12:16 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I do that because it is an idea that has been in the air for some time. It is actually a bit tasteless for an application to have an color theme different from everyone else. Do you tolerate that firefox or openoffice have white text background? I

Re: Build error on Windows - ambiguous

2010-11-19 Thread Joost Verburg
On 11/19/2010 10:21 AM, Jim Oldfield wrote: I'm trying to build LyX on Windows, using lyx-2.0.0beta1.tar.gz and the instructions in INSTALL.WIN32. That info is a little outdated. I recommend using MSVC 2010 with CMake. The new dependencies are available at ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/

Re: official 1.6.8 windows installer?

2010-11-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 11/20/2010 2:51 PM, Jack Tanner wrote: I see that Uwe has kindly uploaded the alternative 1.6.8 installer for Windows. Is anyone preparing the official one also? Yes, will be available soon. Joost

Re: official 1.6.8 windows installer?

2010-11-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 11/20/2010 2:51 PM, Jack Tanner wrote: I see that Uwe has kindly uploaded the alternative 1.6.8 installer for Windows. Is anyone preparing the official one also? The installer is finished and will soon be available on the website. It was delayed a bit because of a bug in the new Adobe Reader

Re: Build error on Windows - ambiguous

2010-11-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 11/19/2010 4:56 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Is in bin the same as in lyx16-deps-msvc2010-x86.zip? That file contains the stuff from branch16 and bin that's relevant for LyX 1.6. For 2.0 everything you need is in bin. Joost

Re: Build error on Windows - ambiguous

2010-11-20 Thread Joost Verburg
On 11/19/2010 4:53 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Is this link somewhere in teh wiki? Last time I searched the ml. When I find some time I'll update the INSTALL.Win32 instructions. For the latest installers I use CMake with MSVC 2010 and all the dependencies are also compiled with MSVC 2010. Joost

Re: no spellcheck after win installer 1.6.8

2010-11-21 Thread Joost Verburg
Yes, I'm working on a fixed version. Joost On 11/21/2010 4:19 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote: see subject: can anyone confirm? thanks, ed.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >