On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein spake thusly:
...
> - par->inInset()->dispatch(cmd);
> + par.inset()->dispatch(cmd);
...
> Rationale: collapsables contain an insettext as a member, so this inset
> cannot be reached from o
>
> This is 'old style' font switching ( i.e. {\it ...} vs \textit{...} )..
>
> Not nice.
>
> Should we stick to \color or is there anything else that could be used?
\textcolor{blue}{...}
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Ok to apply?
Cuter variant.
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1657
diff -u -p -r1.1657 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 27 Oct 2003 20:23:25 -0
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:30:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I now see that you mean something else entirely. Why is 'the old style' so
> bad?
Bad too parse, difficult to decide whether extra braces are needed...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 06:39:21PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> do you see this too?
No.
> - delete a char with the del key.
> - press right arrow to move the cursor in the direction where the char was.
> => you have to press twice to move on. Seems like the deleted char is still
> reco
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Ok to apply?
Hm maybe we should think about the 'two physical positions' between the
end of some row and the beginning of the next one again...
> Index: text2.C
> ==
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:48:57PM +0100, Felix Kurth wrote:
> just corrected a typo.
> Please use the new version at the same url.
What URL?
Is this an "Would be nice if this was included" request?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Ok to apply?
>
| Hm maybe we should think about the 'two physical positions' between the
| end of some row and the beginning of the next one again...
>
|
>> Index: text2.C
>> ==
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> >>
> Lars> | Strange numbers... The first one looks ok, but 52s is too much
> Lars> even on | 384kb/s. This would mean we are producing heavy X
> Lars> traffic, wouldn't it?
>
> Lars> Yes, and we are.
>
> How can we
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:07:51AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > This is 'old style' font switching ( i.e. {\it ...} vs \textit{...} )..
> >
> > Not nice.
> >
> > Should we stick to \color or is there anything else that could be used?
>
>
> \textcolor{blue}{...}
But that would mean anothe
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:28:40AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Perhaps, off-hand I do not like it. It seems a bit like a muddled ui.
> It might work, but initially I know I'd be surprised.
>
> I'd rather have LFUN_PARAGRAPH_END (and we already have variants of
> that.)
It should be access
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:45:47AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Good question, I would like to know too. I have been using (well,
> trying to use during development) LyX over 56 kb/s, and it isn't
> pretty. Four minutes for LyX even to start up... that's *much* worse
> than older versions. (And t
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:32:04AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> But that would mean another level of $...$ to go back to math mode,
> doesn't it?
>
> Is there a \mathcolor{blue}{...}?
\textcolor does not exit from math mode.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:42:41AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:32:04AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > But that would mean another level of $...$ to go back to math mode,
> > doesn't it?
> >
> > Is there a \mathcolor{blue}{...}?
>
> \textcolor does not exit from mat
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:28:40AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Perhaps, off-hand I do not like it. It seems a bit like a muddled ui.
>> It might work, but initially I know I'd be surprised.
>>
>> I'd rather have LFUN_PARAGRAPH_END (and we alrea
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:45:47AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Good question, I would like to know too. I have been using (well,
>> trying to use during development) LyX over 56 kb/s, and it isn't
>> pretty. Four minutes for LyX even to start up... that's *much*
>> worse
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Given the steady stream of people asking about tex2lyx, would it
>> make sense to set up separate cvs trees for both tex2lyx and
>> lyx2lyx? They are separate executables after all...
>
> Note that my original plan was to have them separated and then two
> guys came along p
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:41:27AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Revision 1.118 / (view) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Fri Jun 21
> 11:35:41 2002 UTC (16 months, 1 week ago) by levon
> Branch: MAIN
> Changes since 1.117: +1 -12 lines
> Diff to previous 1.117
> remove show_banner + keyboard
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:41:27AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Revision 1.118 / (view) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Fri Jun 21
>> 11:35:41 2002 UTC (16 months, 1 week ago) by levon
>> Branch: MAIN
>> Changes since 1.117: +1 -12 lines
>> Diff
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:47:31AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> Given the steady stream of people asking about tex2lyx, would it
> >> make sense to set up separate cvs trees for both tex2lyx and
> >> lyx2lyx? They are separate executables after all...
> >
> > Note that m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | which does the 'magic' and is bound to the key. Currently, table
| | editing causes attacks of claustrophobia: One get stucks in a line, in a
| | cell, in a table
>
| Well... IMHO should not change the outer-row.
>
| But I won't have any st
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> The roundtrip works quite well. The main problems are:
...
Georg> - Each loop adds stuff to the preamble
Yes, the preamble handling is still not very good. One thing that
should be efficient and easy to implement is to do as reLyX do
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> It should be accessible by the same key. So there could be
>
> LFUN_ROW_END
> LFUN_PARAGRAPH_END
> LFUN_CELL_END
> LFUN_INSET_END
>
> which implement the 'low level' stuff and are usable for i.e. lyxserver
> without knowing the context, but there should be a
>
> LFUN_GO_T
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:09:39AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | | which does the 'magic' and is bound to the key. Currently, table
> | | editing causes attacks of claustrophobia: One get stucks in a line, in a
> | | cell, in a table
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > It should be accessible by the same key. So there could be
> >
> > LFUN_ROW_END
> > LFUN_PARAGRAPH_END
> > LFUN_CELL_END
> > LFUN_INSET_END
> >
> > which implement the 'low level' stuff and are usabl
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | | which does the 'magic' and is bound to the key. Currently,
> | | table editing causes attacks of claustrophobia: One get stucks
> | | in a line, in a cell, in a table
>>
> | Well... IMHO should not change t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> COuld we just settle on 'this LFUN can be implemented and the user is
> free to bind it to whatever he wants'.
Of course, I was just telling my preference about to what I'll bind it when
it comes ;-)
> [Esc is a bad idea for moving into one of two possible directions. Wha
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:26:48AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > COuld we just settle on 'this LFUN can be implemented and the user is
> > free to bind it to whatever he wants'.
>
> Of course, I was just telling my preference about to what I'll bind it when
> it co
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Sure. And I press often enough to scroll a few pages up just do be
> able to use to go down to the place I want to go to...
Mmm maybe you are right. Dunno, I would have to test it.
The LFUN can be useful in any case.
Alfredo
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Sure. And I press often enough to scroll a few pages up just do be
> > able to use to go down to the place I want to go to...
>
> Mmm maybe you are right. Dunno, I would have to test it.
Just nest
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To the same degree as the 'everything is an inset idea' probably.
>
| What happens if font changes are insets? Should stop at the end of
| a font change?
No. All insets are not created alike.
| Ah wait, now you there is a nice excuse for not having fo
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> The LFUN can be useful in any case.
Can I commit my fix (with the comment) in the meantime or are you going to
do this right now?
Alfredo
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:41:38AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > The LFUN can be useful in any case.
>
> Can I commit my fix (with the comment) in the meantime or are you going to
> do this right now?
I am not going to do this, so you could just commit.
Andr
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>> > Sure. And I press often enough to scroll a few pages up just do
>> > be able to use to go down to the place I want to go to...
>>
>> Mmm maybe you are right. Dunno, I woul
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> The LFUN can be useful in any case.
>
| Can I commit my fix (with the comment) in the meantime or are you going to
| do this right now?
No, go ahead and commit.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:00:23PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> >> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>
> >> > Sure. And I press often enough to scroll a few pages up just do
> >> > be able to use to go
Attached.
Introduces a method 'closeEnvTags' (sensible name?) which allows us to
replace a largish number of identical-looking stanzas. Saves only 15
lines but I think the refactoring 'feels' right.
There would be other opportunities for refactoring in this code. This
is in preparation of suppor
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Attached.
>
| Introduces a method 'closeEnvTags' (sensible name?) which allows us to
| replace a largish number of identical-looking stanzas. Saves only 15
| lines but I think the refactoring 'feels' right.
>
| There would be other opportunities for re
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I find it amazing that you (or anybody) actually understand this...
This feels half way between a compliment and an insult ;-) In any case, I
think that things are much better now than when I first started hacking lyx
one year ago (of course not because of me). Maybe one s
Lots of small stuff.
Should be uncontroversial.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:15:04PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > I find it amazing that you (or anybody) actually understand this...
>
> This feels half way between a compliment and an insult ;-)
I am confused.
I thought the other one was called 'Nobody', not 'A
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Lots of small stuff.
very.
> Should be uncontroversial.
completely.
Alfredo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > I find it amazing that you (or anybody) actually understand this...
>>
>> This feels half way between a compliment and an insult ;-)
>
> I am confused.
>
> I thought the other one was called 'Nobody', not 'Anybody'.
But 'Nobody' understands everything, so why should M
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I am confused.
> I thought the other one was called 'Nobody', not 'Anybody'.
And there we have proof of the superiority of the English language
over German. I can say the same thing in different ways and mean
subtlely different things. Usually derogatory. And no, there is
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>
>> Lots of small stuff.
>
| very.
>
>> Should be uncontroversial.
>
| completely.
concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal
--
Lgb
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> I wonder whether we should go back and make tex2lyx completely
Andre> ignorant of .layout files again and rather produce some
Andre> 'intermediate' format and shift the layout handling part into
Andre> LyX proper.
What would this '
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> >> Lots of small stuff.
> >
> | very.
> >
> >> Should be uncontroversial.
> >
> | completely.
>
> concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal
40 l
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:31PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> I wonder whether we should go back and make tex2lyx completely
> Andre> ignorant of .layout files again and rather produce some
> Andre> 'intermediate' form
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >
>> >> Lots of small stuff.
>> >
>> | very.
>> >
>> >> Should be uncontroversial.
>> >
>> | completel
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11:23, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Attached.
>
> Introduces a method 'closeEnvTags' (sensible name?) which allows us to
> replace a largish number of identical-looking stanzas. Saves only 15
> lines but I think the refactoring 'feels' right.
The name is sensible, sure.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is
> least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all.
You mean you can give abuse but can't handle it when you're being
abused?
Sorry. I meant Y=you find it hard to accept the conclusions of the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Lots of small stuff.
> >
> | very.
> >
> >> Should be uncontroversial.
> >
> | completely.
>
> concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is
>> least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all.
>
| You mean you can give abuse but can't handle it when you're being
| abused?
>
| Sorry. I mea
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is
> > least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all.
>
> You mean you can give abuse but can't handle it when you're being
> a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:32:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> At least I send my patches to the list.
>
> Don't you ever read your own postings?
No, why should I tread myself differently?
> I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees
I just imagine trees covered with patches
*grin*
Isn'
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> m=me
> Y should know m better than that.
Oh I do. I'm just avoiding thinking about an A=abstract I should be
writing.
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which
>> > is least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all.
>>
>> You mean you can give abuse but can't hand
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What would this 'intermediate' format be?
Andre> Basically .lyx but with some 'could be either a layout or some
Andre> ERT' bits.
Another solution would be to precompile layout files into a
dumbed-down version for tex2lyx, but I am n
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:15:04PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > > I find it amazing that you (or anybody) actually understand this...
> >
> > This feels half way between a compliment and
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Attached.
> >
> | Introduces a method 'closeEnvTags' (sensible name?) which allows us to
> | replace a largish number of identical-looking stanzas. Saves only 15
> | li
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> What would this 'intermediate' format be?
>
> Andre> Basically .lyx but with some 'could be either a layout or
> some Andre> ERT' bits.
>
> Another solution would be to precompile layout files into a
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> As for buffer_funcs or sgml, what is the philosophy for putting
> things there? I just placed this thing together with
> simpleDocBookOnePar based on similarity. Please advise, I have no
> strong feelings.
The philosophy is that Buffer should be minimal but complete and tha
Can I apply this so it gets some testing besides mine?
Regards, Alfredo
Index: text.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/text.C,v
retrieving revision 1.488
diff -u -p -u -r1.488 text.C
--- text.C 28 Oct 2003 11:1
JoÃo, it would be asking too much to repost an updated version of all your
pending patches?
I'll apply non-controversial ones and ask for advice on the rest.
Thanks (and sorry for the delay), Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Can I apply this so it gets some testing besides mine?
Yes, why not.
--
Lgb
Hi
I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors like
this:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/insets -I../../src
-I../../../src/insets/../ -I../../../boost -I/pkg/mdhacks/grp/util/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -ftemplate-depth-30
-Wno-non-
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
> like this:
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/insets -I../../src
> -I../../../src/insets/../ -I../../../boost
> -I/pkg/mdhacks/grp/util/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O
> -fno-exce
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> changing that code isn't an option, is it?
If nothing else helps, simply #include
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Securi
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> > changing that code isn't an option, is it?
>
> If nothing else helps, simply #include
Are you suggesting
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> > changing that code isn't an option, is it?
>
> If nothing else helps, simply #include
>
And similarly, c
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:28:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
I think we even could come up with a list of nice-to-have features.
I hope such a list makes it to a public place, like www.lyx.org.
I might get a group or two of 2-4 students that have 50 workdays eac
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:29:10PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> > > changing that code isn't a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:43:47PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> I hope such a list makes it to a public place, like www.lyx.org.
> I might get a group or two of 2-4 students that have 50 workdays each
> to spend on a spring-time programming project.
> The project is an excercise in planning, progr
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
> > like this:
> >
> > -c ../../../src/insets/ExternalSupport.C In file included from
> > ../../../src/support/debugstream.h:17,
> >
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
> other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
>
> If it's important to make LyX compile with 2.9.6 in the future, I can
> ta
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The attach patch (committed) gets rid of th dynamic_casts in
> InsetExternal and generally cleans things up a little.
>
> Christian, could you see whether it now works with gcc 2.96?
Well.. as I just said in another post, 2.96 isn't working. However,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
> > other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
> >
> > If it's important to m
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
>> > like this:
>> >
>> > -c ../../../src/insets/ExternalSupport.C In file inclu
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > Looks like a good candidate for examples to show how you did that :)
>
> No more than
> * create a figure using xfig.
> * open LyX.
> * open the preferences dialog, turn on preview generation.
I did the following, is that w
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Well.. as I just said in another post, 2.96 isn't working. However,
> compilation with 3.2.3 works, so I'll do some testing of the
> external inset using that instead.
Good oh.
As a small pet project for you, try and create a TGIF external
template and document the
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I did the following, is that what you meant?
> Preferences->Look&Feel/Misc->Instant_Preview=On
>
>> * new file.
>> * Insert-File->External Material
>> Select the xfig template
>> choose the file
>> select the display in LyX checkbutton
>>
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> yeah... RH 7.3 how old is that now? RH 8 has come and gone, RH 9
Lars> is still going strong, with RH 10 looming on the horizon...
Lars> I am of course a strange creature, but I see no reason to stick
Lars> with RH 7.3, especia
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:39:51AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:45:47AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Good question, I would like to know too. I have been using (well,
> > trying to use during development) LyX over 56 kb/s, and it isn't
> > pretty. Four minutes
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
> | other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
> >
> | If it's important to make LyX compi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> yeah... RH 7.3 how old is that now? RH 8 has come and gone, RH 9
| Lars> is still going strong, with RH 10 looming on the horizon...
>
| Lars> I am of course a strange creatu
Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Sorry for my late!
| ChangeLog:
| * codeConvert.h (etc): Change FcChar to XftChar according to the
| libxft interface changing.
| * FileDialogPrivate.C : get rid of button support in FileDialog
| because of the implementation of Gtk::FileSelection c
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 16:18, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Unless you are ranting, I was mainly thinking about users who would like
> to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
> (it's strange, but later versions of RH need better hardware...)
What is strange here?
> In my case (on our
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Unless you are ranting, I was mainly thinking about users who would
> like to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
Specifically, uers who would like to run the Qt frontend will need to
compile the Qt libraries too if they use anything other than the
default com
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> As a small pet project for you, try and create a TGIF external
> template and document the external_templates file as you come to
> understand the syntax of the external_templates language.
Already doing that...
> Feel free to throw questions and sug
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
>> | other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:48:57PM +0100, Felix Kurth wrote:
>> just corrected a typo.
>> Please use the new version at the same url.
>
> What URL?
>
> Is this an "Would be nice if this was included" request?
Yes it is. Here my original message (27.10.2003)
Hello
I just
On wtorek 28 październik 2003 11:19 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:39:51AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:45:47AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Good question, I would like to know too. I have been using (well,
> > > trying to use durin
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Also first gcc compiler in the 3 series was released June 18. 2001.
> that is now almost two years ago... still there are distributions that
> use gcc 2.95 in their "stable" setups.
>
> --
> Lgb
And I still run into apps that will only compile with 2.95, which
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 08:34:04PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > rowBreakPoint() has changed beyond my recognition
>
> grumpy as always?
I didn't say it was necessarily a bad thing :L)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:12:38AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> If the cursor is already at the end of some line, it should go to the
> end of a paragraph. If it is there, it should go to the end of the text
> insets. If it is there it should leave the text inset.
Strongly disagree in this conte
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| And I still run into apps that will only compile with 2.95, which may
| explain why some dists use it. There's no excuse for 2.96 tho.
And I'll claim that those apps really need a brush up, and don't
deserve to be called a C++ program. :-)
Or perhap
Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Sorry for my late!
No worries.
but if at all possible please give us a 'ping' from time to time so we
know that you are still there.
| ChangeLog:
| * codeConvert.h (etc): Change FcChar to XftChar according to the
| libxft interface changing.
| *
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> This replaces dispatch_result enum with a real type, forward
> declared when possible.
Also, you don't need to use DispatchResult in the body of the code,
just when passing it around. The operator dispatch_result_t() means
that things will just work.
For example
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> This replaces dispatch_result enum with a real type, forward
> declared when possible.
>
> a couple of Mathed :: dispatch changed to priv_dispatch and a couple
> moved from public to protected.
Hey! You're stealing my ideas ;-)
> This will go in unless I get obje
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>
>> This replaces dispatch_result enum with a real type, forward
>> declared when possible.
>
| Also, you don't need to use DispatchResult in the body of the code,
| just when passing it around. The operator dispatch_resu
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
