Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >
>> >> Lots of small stuff.
>> >
>> | very.
>> >
>> >> Should be uncontroversial.
>> >
>> | completely.
>> 
>> concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal
>
| 40 lines saved and yet a couple of lines of 160 chars and more broken into
| decent bits.
>
| I wonder where your share got stuck this week ;-)

At least I send my patches to the list.

Don't you ever read your  own postings?

I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is
least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to