Re: 1.3pre2 small bug in menu fonts

On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:24:31PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: > > qt 3.0.5-3 and 2.3.1-22 ; qt-emb 3.0.3-1 ; I am running a debian testing > OS. The font section of the preferences file contains. You can only compile against one version of QT. What does lyx --version says ? IF you compiled LyX

Re: lyx crash and libc

Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi.. I updated and compiled the cvs version today and lyx still crashes | on startup.. looks like some incompatibility with libc.. I'm running | Debian on a powerpc based machine... below is the backtrace from the | crash.. I had the same problem when I

[patch] relyx

Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this patch has any relevance? It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until I have confirmations. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] relyx

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this | patch has any relevance? | | It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until | I have confirmations. ? relyx.diff Index: BasicLyX.pm ===

Error compiling lyx 1.3.0pre2 on Mac OS X 10.2.3

I get the following error when compiling lyx 1.3.0pre2 on Mac OS X 10.2.3: Making all in mathed source='formulabase.C' object='formulabase.lo' libtool=yes \ depfile='.deps/formulabase.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/formulabase.TPlo' \ depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../config/depcomp \ /bin/sh ../../libtool --mod

Re: Error compiling lyx 1.3.0pre2 on Mac OS X 10.2.3

Andreas Helte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I get the following error when compiling lyx 1.3.0pre2 on Mac OS X 10.2.3: Darwin g++ bug? libc++ bug? I do not think that LyX is causing this. -- Lgb

XForms 1.0 and LyX 1.2.3 RPMs and SRPMs for Red Hat Linux 7.3 and 8.0

Hi I built RPMs and SRPMs of XForms 1.0 and LyX 1.2.3 for Red Hat Linux 7.3 and 8.0. Maybe you can make use of them:

[patch] make scrolling better

I'd like some of you to take a look at this and try it out. I am not about its size, and it is not as clean as I would have liked. But it seems to work fairly great. (on xforms) I have not tested on qt. Index: src/BufferView.C ===

Re: [Bug 822] scroll while dragging is too fast sometimes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-19 17:23 --- | I think I've explained how the code works. The view is scrolled one page view | per X-event. Events are retained every 200ms; all intervening events are | ignored. If you're interested in e

Re: Exporting pdf from Koma-script book with 2 page option

On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > Christian Ridderström schrieb: > > > Oh.. and here's a _very_ short example .tex-file that produce the > > > problem: > > > > > > short_ex.tex: > > > \documentclass{scrbook} > > > \begin{docum

Yurtdýþý Telefon görüþmelerinde %90 a varan tasarruf

Her ay astronomik Telefon faturalarý görmek istemiyorsanýz Yurtdýþýna , NORMAL Telefonunuzdan Yurtdýþýndaki Normal ve Mobil telefonlara veya Ýnternet üzerinden Normal ve Mobil Telefonlara yapacaðýnýz görüþmelerde , %90 a varan tasarruf saðlamak istiyorsanýz ,aþaðýdaki linki týklayýp bize ul

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I'd like some of you to take a look at this and try it out. > > I am not about its size, and it is not as clean as I would have liked. > > But it seems to work fairly great. (on xforms) I have not tested on > qt. Well it does what you want it to do. With this patch

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

I qt it works well selecting line by line. Will this patch be applied now? João. On 19 Jan 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I'd like some of you to take a look at this and try it out. > > I am not about its size, and it is not as clean as I would have liked. > > But it seems to work fairly

Re: [PATCH] de.po

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Project-Id-Version: LyX 1.3.0\n" | "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-01-14 02:14+0100\n" | -"PO-Revision-Date: 2002-01-14 03:00+0100\n" | +"PO-Revision-Date: 2002-01-18 03:00+0100\n" Can you fix the year and resend? You mean I

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:47:46PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Do you plan to support the old behaviour of marking text page by page or do > you plan to just scrap it? shift + page down still works regards john -- "Anyone who quotes Rusty in their sig is an idiot." - me

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 03:51:57PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote: > I qt it works well selecting line by line. Will this patch be applied now? We need a newer patch from Lars, the one posted breaks scrolling around tables regards john -- "Anyone who quotes Rusty in their sig is an idio

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Do you plan to support the old behaviour of marking text page by page or do | you plan to just scrap it? scrap it. | I can see a use for both behaviours. Maybe if | the user holds down the shift key, they can scroll in the old way? The old way is no

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I qt it works well selecting line by line. Will this patch be | applied now? Not sure. I think it is a bit too big... It might be a 1.3.1 thingie. but it also depends on what the other developers say. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:08:50PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > The old way is not what we need... what we need is a version that can > move faster if you want it to. My idea was to do the same as emacs: > the further below the window you drag the faster it scrolls. This sounds sensible,

Re: [PATCH] de.po

Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | "Project-Id-Version: LyX 1.3.0\n" | > | "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-01-14 02:14+0100\n" | > | -"PO-Revision-Date: 2002-01-14 03:00+0100\n" | > | +"PO-Revision-Date: 2002-01

Re: [PATCH] de.po

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:16:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | You mean I shall resend a 50KB patch just because of a single character? > > Takes a lot longer for me to apply and fix than just ask you to > resend. But in a holistic sense, the total amount of work is more, so you are ac

[PATCH] LyX output

Hello, translating LyX into another language is a real pain nowadays due to the many similar texts. Not only that QT and xforms have a different notation for shortcuts - there are also inconsistent usages of capital letters, spaces, and colons. I have scanned the LyX sources systematically for

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:08:50PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > The old way is not what we need... what we need is a version that can | > move faster if you want it to. My idea was to do the same as emacs: | > the further below the window you dr

Re: [PATCH] LyX output

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:19:51PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > I have scanned the LyX sources systematically for the problems above. > Attached please find a patch that resolves many of them. I hope that at > least a few transitions are not needed in the future. Moreover, the > patch improv

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:19:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > So QT decides that you don't want the event? > (qt code and not our code?) There *is no event*. The mouse is not moving, there is no input, hence no event. An idle callback should somehow recognise we are scrolling and scrol

Re: [PATCH] LyX output

Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | translating LyX into another language is a real pain nowadays due to | the many similar texts. Not only that QT and xforms have a different | notation for shortcuts - there are also inconsistent usages of capital | letters, spaces, and colo

Re: [PATCH] LyX output

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, John Levon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:19:51PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > > > I have scanned the LyX sources systematically for the problems above. > > Attached please find a patch that resolves many of them. I hope that at > > least a few transitions are not n

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:19:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > So QT decides that you don't want the event? | > (qt code and not our code?) | | There *is no event*. The mouse is not moving, there is no input, hence | no event. | | An idle ca

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:31:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | There *is no event*. The mouse is not moving, there is no input, hence > | no event. > > One thing that is done correctly in xforms then. Erm, no. There is no event, so no event should be delivered. Imagine if you are trac

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:31:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > | There *is no event*. The mouse is not moving, there is no input, hence | > | no event. | > | > One thing that is done correctly in xforms then. | | Erm, no. There is no event,

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:37:21PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > With qt this kind of scrolling is impossible... > > or you have to hack around... It's a relatively simple thing to do, I suspect, and it's not a hack if you ask me. But anyway. john -- "Anyone who quotes Rusty in their si

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:37:21PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > With qt this kind of scrolling is impossible... | > | > or you have to hack around... | | It's a relatively simple thing to do, I suspect, and it's not a hack if | you ask me. ho

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:42:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > how? > > You must recieve an event? QTimer, or the idle callback > the whole of lyx is event driven. Well, it is *now* (I believe). It certainly wasn't properly event-driven before GUII regards john -- "Anyone who quotes

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:42:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > how? | > | > You must recieve an event? | | QTimer, or the idle callback And how does this know the event you want replayed? | > the whole of lyx is event driven. | | Well, it

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:55:19PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | QTimer, or the idle callback > > And how does this know the event you want replayed? because you started the timer and you know what "mode" you're in. Stop trying to trick me into fixing this ! > | Well, it is *now* (I bel

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Anyway I'm having a bit of an Andre moment wrt this discussion... I guess this counts as "hitling" the discussion. hitling En tråd mister sin verdi straks noen trekker inn nazismen, WWII etc, ved at resten av diskusjonen lett utarter til en verdiløs f

Re: [PATCH] LyX output

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I am not sure that I want this now. Especially because of po files. For every change we do to the l10n strings you get a lot of fuzzies in the po files... I'd rather apply this as one of the first things to 1.4.0. But when shall we fix the texts if not now? The tran

Re: [patch] make scrolling better

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 08:04:24PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | Anyway I'm having a bit of an Andre moment wrt this discussion... > > I guess this counts as "hitling" the discussion. Gullik's Law huh ? john -- "Anyone who quotes Rusty in their sig is an idiot." - me

Re: 1.3pre2 small bug in menu fonts

Hello, Dekel Tsur writes: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:24:31PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: > > > > qt 3.0.5-3 and 2.3.1-22 ; qt-emb 3.0.3-1 ; I am running a debian testing > > OS. The font section of the preferences file contains. > > You can only compile against one version of QT. > What

Re: lyx crash and libc

> What compiler is this? > (and version?) gcc, g++.. version is 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) glib-config --version gives 1.2.10 Thanks, nirmal

Re: bugzilla rides again

That would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm currently aware of the following issues 1) The index page is wrong 2) The simple-bug-guide is gone. Both should be fixed eventually. If anyone's really cut up about one of them then I may be able to fast track it. -- ===

Re: Movies

Attached file: "Sample.pif Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH] Load/Create Docs with missing TeX classes

On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 12:04:01PM +, John Levon wrote: > Of course I would not call it bad. It's damn good. But this is not going > to stop me whining about wrinkles that *are* there. We can do better > than doing better than Word. And I may remind you to a previous offer: If you come up with

Minor ert bug

Hi all, If I insert *Insert->Insert File) some text into an ert box, it doesn't appear until I click anywhere in the document. This is unlike inserting text outside an ert box, where it appears immediately. lyx130cvs --version LyX 1.3.0cvs of Tue, Jan 14, 2003 Built on Jan 13 2003, 05:19:04 Confi