[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | What do you lose? (Genuinely mystified.) This class derives from
| | boost::signalX, so we retain all that beast's semantics. All we do is state
| | explicitly that copy-construction does not copy at all but generates a fresh,
| | empty insta
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
>> But you loost all the semantics for this particular signal right?
>
| Well, I can't get oozed to people writing "to loose" and "looser"
| (except in contexts like "my trousers have become looser", rar
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 02 July 2002 8:26 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Monday 01 July 2002 6:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:24:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> >> > > [If do, can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> But you loost all the semantics for this particular signal right?
Well, I can't get oozed to people writing "to loose" and "looser"
(except in contexts like "my trousers have become looser", rare
enough), but "loost" is a noon for me. Was this o
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 8:26 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Monday 01 July 2002 6:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:24:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> > > [If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent somehow?]
> >>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 01 July 2002 6:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:24:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > > [If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent somehow?]
>> >
>> > Wrap you signal inside LyXSignal ?
>> >
>> > template
>> > cla
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 06:09:17PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> No, I just made it up. Would it not do the trick though?
I think it would.
Andre', currently destroying non-math insets...
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eith
On Monday 01 July 2002 6:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:24:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > [If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent somehow?]
> >
> > Wrap you signal inside LyXSignal ?
> >
> > template
> > class LyXSignal : public Signal{
> > LyXSignal(LyXS
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:24:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > [If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent somehow?]
>
> Wrap you signal inside LyXSignal ?
>
> template
> class LyXSignal : public Signal{
> LyXSignal(LyXSignal const &) {}
> };
Do we have that already?
Andre'
--
Tho
On Monday 01 July 2002 5:34 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Am I right in assuming that I have to provide a copy constructor for insets
> as soon as the inset contains a signal as a signal is noncopiable?
That is correct. Signals are non-copyable.
> [If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent someho
Am I right in assuming that I have to provide a copy constructor for insets
as soon as the inset contains a signal as a signal is noncopiable?
[If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent somehow?]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do
11 matches
Mail list logo
