David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > >> But you loost all the semantics for this particular signal right? > | Well, I can't get oozed to people writing "to loose" and "looser" | (except in contexts like "my trousers have become looser", rare | enough), but "loost" is a noon for me. Was this on papoose?
Why bug us with this?
Are you dissing my fat fingers?
[and no, I do not find you reply particularly funny]
--
Lgb
