Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 01 July 2002 6:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:24:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > > [If do, cant' this be made tmore transparent somehow?]
>> >
>> > Wrap you signal inside LyXSignal ?
>> >
>> > template<typename Signal>
>> > class LyXSignal : public Signal{
>> > LyXSignal(LyXSignal const &) {}
>> > };
>>
>> Do we have that already?
>>
>> Andre'
>
| No, I just made it up. Would it not do the trick though?
But you loost all the semantics for this particular signal right?
I'd prefere the explicit copy constructor.
--
Lgb
