Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:16 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:14:48AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:06 PM Stephan Witt wrote: > > > > > Am 02.11.2020 um 19:10 schrieb Joel Kulesza : > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly H

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:14:48AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:06 PM Stephan Witt wrote: > > > Am 02.11.2020 um 19:10 schrieb Joel Kulesza : > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly Heck > > wrote: > > > On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrot

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:06 PM Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 02.11.2020 um 19:10 schrieb Joel Kulesza : > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > > On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > Attached is the patch. > > > > Riki > > > > I seem to never be ab

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

Am 02.11.2020 um 19:10 schrieb Joel Kulesza : > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Attached is the patch. > > Riki > > I seem to never be able to successfully apply patches. This is no exception > (I'm on maste

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:46 AM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 11/2/20 1:10 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > >> On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> >> Attached is the patch. >> >> Riki >> > > I seem to never be able to

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On 11/2/20 1:10 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Attached is the patch. Riki I seem to never be able to successfully apply patches.  This is no exceptio

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Attached is the patch. > > Riki > I seem to never be able to successfully apply patches. This is no exception (I'm on master at e8a28c33c), so I cannot test it (complaints follow m

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On 11/1/20 4:54 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 11/1/20 12:47 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: >> All, >> >> Thanks for your consideration and good discussion on default >> continuous spellchecker behavior subsequent to >> https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On 11/1/20 5:14 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 2/11/2020 10:54 am, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 11/1/20 12:47 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Thanks for your consideration and good discussion on default >>> continuous spellchecke

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On 2/11/2020 10:54 am, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 11/1/20 12:47 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: All, Thanks for your consideration and good discussion on default continuous spellchecker behavior subsequent to https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg213704.html <https://www.m

Re: Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

On 11/1/20 12:47 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > All, > > Thanks for your consideration and good discussion on default > continuous spellchecker behavior subsequent to > https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg213704.html > <https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@li

Continuous Spellchecker Default Behavior (and Voting?)

All, Thanks for your consideration and good discussion on default continuous spellchecker behavior subsequent to https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg213704.html. I've created this separate thread to avoid continuing to hijack the other thread on dictionary inclusion a

Re: [LyX/master] Fix default spellchecker when only Enchant is available

Le 19/03/2018 à 16:38, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Fix default spellchecker when only Enchant is available This has been annoying me for ages. Riki, OK for 2.3.x ? OK. Done. I wonder why it took me so long to actually look at the cause. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] Fix default spellchecker when only Enchant is available

On 03/19/2018 09:21 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 19/03/2018 à 14:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> commit ae473b012a9c7605919f3f3bfad35710cab29566 >> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> Date:   Mon Mar 19 14:07:03 2018 +0100 >> >> Fix default

Re: [LyX/master] Fix default spellchecker when only Enchant is available

Le 19/03/2018 à 14:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : commit ae473b012a9c7605919f3f3bfad35710cab29566 Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Mon Mar 19 14:07:03 2018 +0100 Fix default spellchecker when only Enchant is available This has been annoying me for ages. Riki, OK for

Re: regression in 2.2.3?: spellchecker-panel has misplaced boxes

Am 18.06.2017 um 17:30 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 04:32:30PM +0200, mn wrote: >> On 17.06.17 23:05, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 04:49:33PM +0200, mn wrote: With 2.2.3 on mac 10.10 the spelling panel has now overlapping boxes. Which

Re: regression in 2.2.3?: spellchecker-panel has misplaced boxes

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 04:32:30PM +0200, mn wrote: > On 17.06.17 23:05, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 04:49:33PM +0200, mn wrote: > >> > >> With 2.2.3 on mac 10.10 the spelling panel has now overlapping boxes. > >> Which makes them very hard to use. > >> Checking 2.1.3 and alp

Re: regression in 2.2.3?: spellchecker-panel has misplaced boxes

On 17.06.17 23:05, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 04:49:33PM +0200, mn wrote: >> >> With 2.2.3 on mac 10.10 the spelling panel has now overlapping boxes. >> Which makes them very hard to use. >> Checking 2.1.3 and alpha1: those do not seem to have this problem. > > Are the Qt ver

Re: regression in 2.2.3?: spellchecker-panel has misplaced boxes

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 04:49:33PM +0200, mn wrote: > > With 2.2.3 on mac 10.10 the spelling panel has now overlapping boxes. > Which makes them very hard to use. > Checking 2.1.3 and alpha1: those do not seem to have this problem. Are the Qt versions the same? (you can see this in LyX > About)

regression in 2.2.3?: spellchecker-panel has misplaced boxes

With 2.2.3 on mac 10.10 the spelling panel has now overlapping boxes. Which makes them very hard to use. Checking 2.1.3 and alpha1: those do not seem to have this problem. Suspiciously there does not seem to be anything related to this on trac? Can anyone confirm that it is indeed a regression? It

Re: Fwd: adding costum spellchecker to lyx

Le 19/03/17 à 21:06, kobi kolodner a écrit : Hi I would be glad if you did point me in the right direction. It will be an interesting challenge for me to see this project through. I'm glad to hear you think the project could be useful A slightly different idea: one of the spell checking backen

Re: Fwd: adding costum spellchecker to lyx

> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:31:45PM +0200, kobi kolodner wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python. > > how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in > > Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellc

Re: Fwd: adding costum spellchecker to lyx

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:31:45PM +0200, kobi kolodner wrote: > Hi > > I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python. > how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in > Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellchecker engine >

Fwd: adding costum spellchecker to lyx

Hi I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python. how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellchecker engine I am very much a novice in writing code so any help\suggestion even if it seems obvious will be

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

Thanks a lot Now it works Best greetings Valentin 09.06.2015 20:05, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin >: I do not understand exactly "reconfigure LyX". Does it means that I should repeat: ./configue make make in

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 19:01 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > I do not understand exactly "reconfigure LyX". Does it means that I should > repeat: > > ./configue > make > make install > Yes. Jürgen > > ? > >

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 19:57, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin <mailto:kuz...@fnal.gov>>: Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so, could you please post the configure.log? Jü

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > > Sorry, I do not have a spellchecker in Lyx stil > Did you reconfigure LyX after you installed libhunspell-dev? If so, could you please post the configure.log? Jürgen

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 19:16, Jürgen Spitzmüller пишет: 2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin <mailto:kuz...@fnal.gov>>: Couldn't you list pakages which I should install to have spellchecker? I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015 um 18:16:43, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > 2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > > > > > Couldn't you list pakages > > which I should install to have spellchecker? > > > > I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled i

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 18:09 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > > Couldn't you list pakages > which I should install to have spellchecker? > I do not use *buntu myself, but I googled it for you: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/libhunspell-dev Jürgen > > Is it possible in 10.10? > >

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

kage of > hunspell) as well if you want to copile LyX against hunspell. > > Jürgen > > > > Couldn't you list pakages > which I should install to have spellchecker? > > Is it possible in 10.10? > Look at: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/lyx/lyx-debian-stable.2

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Lyx does not find it As elaborated on trac, you need to install the headers (devel package of hunspell) as well if you want to copile LyX against hunspell. Jürgen Couldn't you list pakages which I should install to have spellche

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

2015-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Valentin A. Kuzmin : > I had installed hunspell: > > [maxt ~] $ sudo apt-get install hunspell > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > hunspell is already the newest version. > The following packages were automatica

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 18:52, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3 -+- Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: general

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3 -+- Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4 Component: general

Re: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3

09.06.2015 18:39, LyX Ticket Tracker пишет: #9611: No spellchecker in 2.1.3 -+- Reporter: valentin630 | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.1.4 Component: general

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014 um 12:08:21, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: > > 17/07/2014 17:55, Scott Kostyshak: > > > >> Yes I like "none compiled in" but have mixed feelings. If it is > >> someone who compiled LyX themselves, then it is

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 17/07/2014 17:55, Scott Kostyshak: > >> Yes I like "none compiled in" but have mixed feelings. If it is >> someone who compiled LyX themselves, then it is good because it is a >> strong signal of how to fix the problem. But if it is s

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

17/07/2014 17:55, Scott Kostyshak: Yes I like "none compiled in" but have mixed feelings. If it is someone who compiled LyX themselves, then it is good because it is a strong signal of how to fix the problem. But if it is someone using a package on their distro compiled by the packager then maybe

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 17/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak: > >>> Maybe the list that allows to choose the spellchecker could read "none >>> available"? >> >> >> I wanted to come up with something that woul

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 17.07.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > >> 17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak: >>> If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields >>> are greyed out. This comes up from time

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

17/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak: Maybe the list that allows to choose the spellchecker could read "none available"? I wanted to come up with something that would signal to the user that it is a build issue and not a "can't find hunspell" issue (i.e. it's

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak: > >> If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields >> are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it >> be more or less con

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

Am 17.07.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > 17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak: >> If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields >> are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it >> be more or less confusing to have a me

Re: showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak: If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it be more or less confusing to have a message explaining that LyX needs to have the option set at compile time? What kind

showing a "not built with spellchecker enabled" message?

If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it be more or less confusing to have a message explaining that LyX needs to have the option set at compile time? Scott

Re: spellchecker crash 8238

On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Andrew U. Frank wrote: > dear scott > i tried to find my comment on the list to respond to but i could not find > it. (my original post was via email, but can i add to a discussion by > email?) When you reply, instead of replying to me, reply to the address lyx-dev

Re: spellchecker crash 8238

On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Andrew U. Frank wrote: > this seems not to be a deb package... i tried to put it in synaptic, but it > did report problems. is it deb archive? Hi Andrew, Please respond to the list. Try running the following commands: 1. sudo apt-add-repository ppa:lyx-devel/dail

Re: spellchecker crash 8238

Am 04.11.2012 um 09:23 schrieb Andrew U. Frank : > i fear i encounter the problem reported in bug 8238: > how do i get the patch version? > i have downloaded from lyx dev the version 2.0.4.1 The official version 2.0.5 is coming soon. This bug is fixed then. You can get the source tarball here: ht

Re: spellchecker crash 8238

Do you use Ubuntu? If so, Liviu Andronic and Rob Oakes have set up a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily Respond (to the list) if you need instructions on how to set that up (it's easy). If you don't use Ubuntu, see the instructions in the source tar ball for how to compile. Scot

spellchecker crash 8238

i fear i encounter the problem reported in bug 8238: how do i get the patch version? i have downloaded from lyx dev the version 2.0.4.1 thank you! af -- - Prof. Dr. sc.techn. Andrew U. Frank+43 1 58801 12710 direct Geoinformation, TU Wien+43 1 58801 12700 office Gussh

Re: Spellchecker as you type

Pascal Fischer googlemail.com> writes: > > In addition to today's spellchecker there should be the possibility to > activate spell-checking as you type. (With those red wavy lines under This is available as Tools -> Preferences -> Language Settings -> Spellchecker

Spellchecker as you type

In addition to today's spellchecker there should be the possibility to activate spell-checking as you type. (With those red wavy lines under unknown words.) Because often you make a little error and can correct it as you type - without suggestions for other words. That would be a

Re: #7957: cocoAspell Spellchecker not working

Hello, My problem has finally been solved. I had to change the setting in LyX -> Preferences -> Language Settings -> Spellchecker -> Spellchecker engine to "Native," delete the text in the "Alternative language" field, reconfigure LyX, and restart the program. I&#

Re: #7957: cocoAspell Spellchecker not working (was: Spellchecker not working)

in LyX preferences. If this is not the solution you may enable the log messages of LyX and verify them. View => View Messages => Settings: Debug Level GUI = yes Then type F7 and look for the patterns " misspelled word: ..." and/or " Spellchecker: start check at" You shoul

Re: #7957: cocoAspell Spellchecker not working (was: Spellchecker not working)

't get the spellchecker to work then I will be forced to use a different program. Mike On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: > #7957: cocoAspell Spellchecker not working > > --+- > Reporte

Re: #7952: Crash or Assertion when Escaping out of "Ignore All" spellchecker dialog.

Am 21.12.2011 um 16:24 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker: > #7952: Crash or Assertion when Escaping out of "Ignore All" spellchecker > dialog. > +--- > Reporter: gmatht | Owner: stwitt

Re: Warnings in spellchecker if()

Am 07.10.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: > Current trunk gives these warnings, which seem related to me. > > Buffer.cpp:4197:42: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ > > int Buffer::spellCheck(DocIterator & from, DocIterator & to, > [...] > // If from is at the end of th

Warnings in spellchecker if()

Current trunk gives these warnings, which seem related to me. Buffer.cpp:4197:42: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ int Buffer::spellCheck(DocIterator & from, DocIterator & to, [...] // If from is at the end of the document (which is possible // when leaving the mathed) LyX wi

Re: #7564: On-the-fly spellchecker jumps

Am 19.05.2011 um 03:24 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker: > #7564: On-the-fly spellchecker jumps > --+- > Reporter: jcredberry|Owner: stwitt > Type: defect| Status: reopened > Pr

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

Am 17.04.2011 um 22:16 schrieb Jim Oldfield: >> From: Joost Verburg >> >> "Julien Rioux" wrote in message >> news:iod00u$hei$1...@dough.gmane.org... >>> You would need to make aspell visible to the configure script by putting >>> the >> >> path to aspell.exe in your PATH environment vari

Re: spellchecker for lyx 2.0 rc2

Am 17.04.2011 um 03:12 schrieb Joost Verburg: > "Julien Rioux" wrote in message > news:iod00u$hei$1...@dough.gmane.org... >> You would need to make aspell visible to the configure script by putting the >> path to aspell.exe in your PATH environment variable or alternatively in the >> PATH in L

Re: #7429: Endless loop with spellchecker with Master/Child-documents

Am 13.04.2011 um 22:26 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker: > #7429: Endless loop with spellchecker with Master/Child-documents > +--- > Reporter: klwy|Owner: lasgouttes > Type: defect | Sta

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > PS I noticed that the same phrase "Replace word with current choice" is in > the tooltips for "Find next", "Replace" and "Replace all". This is the > correct phrase only for the second one. this is now fixed. pavel

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 08.04.2011 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Hello, Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all': We reached the end of the document,

Re: #7430: Spellchecker doesn't recognize document language

Stephan Witt wrote: > As Abdel said, this dialog needs some attention. > The attached patch fixes the following issues: > * updateView() should start a spell check only on first call after init > * at the end of document the dialog should hide itself when user said "no" to > continue spell check >

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Am 08.04.2011 um 09:38 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: > Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : >> On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore >>> all':

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Hello, Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all': We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the beginning? If I say yes, it rest

Re: #7430: Spellchecker doesn't recognize document language

Am 06.04.2011 um 21:29 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker: > #7430: Spellchecker doesn't recognize document language > +--- > Reporter: klwy| Owner: lasgouttes > Type: defect | Status: new

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Am 04.04.2011 um 13:02 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 04.04.2011 um 11:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > >> On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore &

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Am 04.04.2011 um 11:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore >> all': >> >> >> We reached the e

Re: Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

On 04/03/2011 08:38 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Hello, Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all': We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the beginning? If I say yes, it restars at the beginning, which is

Spellchecker raises a question when "Ignore all" is used (Lyx-2.0.0svn)

Hello, Using the spellchecker window, I get this quite often when I hit 'Ignore all': We reached the end of the document, would you like to continue from the beginning? If I say yes, it restars at the beginning, which is not what I want. If I say no, it goes on where I was, which

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 24.03.2011 um 00:09 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I'll try to solve the end-of-document too - but I doubt it could be done >> without any state variable... > > I managed to do this so I committed the patch. It seems to work fine now. Yes. Fine. Than

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: I'll try to solve the end-of-document too - but I doubt it could be done without any state variable... I managed to do this so I committed the patch. It seems to work fine now. Abdel.

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 23/03/2011 18:28, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 06:28 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: For end-of-document I'd call it normal when LFUN_CHAR_FORWARD does not do anything. That was the original goal of the stuck_ variable - to catch the case when the last word is misspelled and you hit th

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 23.03.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >> >>> On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stepha

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 02:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.201

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

> So this means that this stuck_ variable was useful for some dark corner case > it seems... I removed it because I didn't see how and why it is useful. 1-0 for documentation. Vincent

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 23.03.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >> >>> On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abde

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/23/2011 12:48 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.201

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 23.03.2011 um 10:18 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> >>> Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >>> On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdel

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The p

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 21.03.2011 um 18:00 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > >> On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >>> Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 21.03.2011 um 09:43 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >> >>> Hi Pavel, >>> >>> Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this is >>> mostly mechanical changes needed for a proper D

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 03/21/2011 07:30 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Hi Pavel, Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this is mostly mechanical changes needed for a proper Dock widget and code shuffling: * Transform Spellchecker.ui into a simpl

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Am 20.03.2011 um 17:50 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > Hi Pavel, > > Here is a patch that should fixes #7375. The patch is big but this is mostly > mechanical changes needed for a proper Dock widget and code shuffling: > > * Transform Spellchecker.ui into a simple QWidget > * Pimpl all we can > *

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 21/03/2011 00:55, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> On 20/03/2011 23:56, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> On 20/03/2011 21:38, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Yes, this is normal and due to the minimum height of the two widgets. > But I > cannot f

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

ss - int total_; - int progress_; - /// word count - int count_; - /// flag for last move forward success - bool stuck_; }; -GuiSpellchecker::GuiSpellchecker(GuiView & lv) - : DockView(lv, "spellchecker", qt_("Spellchecker"), -

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

uiView & lv) - : DockView(lv, "spellchecker", qt_("Spellchecker"), - Qt::RightDockWidgetArea), d(new GuiSpellchecker::Private) +SpellcheckerWidget::SpellcheckerWidget(GuiView * gv, QWidget * parent) + : QWidget(parent), d(new Private(this)) { d-&

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 20/03/2011 23:56, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 20/03/2011 21:38, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Yes, this is normal and due to the minimum height of the two widgets. But I cannot figure out how you get the two widget on top of each other. On my Windows system with Qr4.7 the 2 d

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 20/03/2011 21:38, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Yes, this is normal and due to the minimum height of the two widgets. But I cannot figure out how you get the two widget on top of each other. On my Windows system with Qr4.7 the 2 dock widgets are arranged in tabs automatically...

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Yes, this is normal and due to the minimum height of the two widgets. But I > cannot figure out how you get the two widget on top of each other. On my > Windows system with Qr4.7 the 2 dock widgets are arranged in tabs > automatically... > So the fix would be to force

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

On 20/03/2011 18:22, Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Please give this patch a try and tell me if it's OK to commit. There are still quite some bugs for this dialog that I will try to address afterwards. thy still overlap into each other when window size is small (in fact normal).

Re: [Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Please give this patch a try and tell me if it's OK to commit. There are > still quite some bugs for this dialog that I will try to address > afterwards. thy still overlap into each other when window size is small (in fact normal). pavel

[Patch] Cleanup patch that fixes #7375 (spellchecker gui)

iew * gv_; /// current word being checked and lang code WordLangTuple word_; /// values for progress @@ -71,11 +85,11 @@ }; -GuiSpellchecker::GuiSpellchecker(GuiView & lv) - : DockView(lv, "spellchecker", qt_("Spellchecker"), - Qt::RightDockW

Re: #7084: Dynamic spellchecker throws "Search string is empty" exemption

Am 27.11.2010 um 15:32 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker: > #7084: Dynamic spellchecker throws "Search string is empty" exemption > +--- > Reporter: guenno | Owner: stwitt > Type: defect |

Re: Spellchecker not active, command disable

> % rpm -q -v -f /usr/include/aspell.h > aspell-devel-0.60.6-28.2.i586 > % > > Don't ask me how to install it with Ubuntu. > Yep.. thanks Stephan. I missed that In Ubuntu, I can find it in Synaptic Package Manager libaspell-dev, also libaiksaurus-1.x-dev for thesaurus. Now, It is ok. The spelling

  1   2   3   4   5   >