fix to "bug" 222 and small changes

2002-01-29 Thread Herbert Voss
please commit. small fix to "bug" 222 updates of the help-files delete old figure-entry in default-ui Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/ Index: lib/ChangeLog === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/ChangeLog,v retri

small changes

2001-11-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
Changing the shorts in lyx row starts a whole mess of subsequent 'int <-> unsigend int' "conflict", so I left them out. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: lyxlex.h ===

Re: [PATCH] small changes

2001-06-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | diff -u -r1.31 layout.h | --- layout.h 2001/05/30 13:53:29 1.31 | +++ layout.h 2001/06/02 10:49:33 | @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ | extern void LyXSetStyle(); | | /// | -enum no_good_name_for_this { | +enum { | /// | LYX_ENVIRONMENT_DEFAULT =

[PATCH] small changes

2001-06-02 Thread John Levon
A random collection of small fixes thanks john -- "Please crack down on the Chinaman's friends and Hitler's commander. Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast. A boy has never wept ... nor dashed a thousand kim. Did you hear me?" - Dutch Schultz Index: ChangeL

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-03-05 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 05 March 2001 10:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | This should help the iconify situation in xforms. > | It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash, > | and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C > > Have this been comitted?

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-03-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This should help the iconify situation in xforms. | It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash, | and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C Have this been comitted? Lgb

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-24 Thread John Levon
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > as a free standing (not FormBase dependent) you can probably avoid the > signals or at least setup hideSplash to call a Dialogs::destroySplash() > which could then remove the splash screen entirely. makes sense. > > I can't remember how splash was handle

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Actually, John, I'd redo FormSplash as a stand alone class, not derived from > > FormBase at all. You redefine or don't use pretty well all the virtual > > methods(). It's all a bit confusing; imagine what it

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | You're trying to delete the same object twice. | | void FormSplash::build() | { | dialog_ = build_splash(); | } | | | FD_form_splash * FormSplash::build_splash() | { | FD_form_splash *fdui = new FD_form_splash; | fdui->form->u_vdata = this;

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > You're trying to delete the same object twice. > > Capisco? > A *d'oh* sorry, sorry, slow on the take today john -- "Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy ha

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:55, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > > What a weird way to ask a question ! > > > > My apologies. > > no problem, I would smiley but I know what day it is. > > > > Doesn't the "pre" delete the FormSplash object itself rather than

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > Actually, John, I'd redo FormSplash as a stand alone class, not derived from > FormBase at all. You redefine or don't use pretty well all the virtual > methods(). It's all a bit confusing; imagine what it'll be like in 6 month's > time! > > Angus M

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:53, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Application form being processed by the Lunatic Asylum as we speak. > > ha ! > > > Anyway, futher comment to FormSplash. You derive it from FormBaseBI which > > already has a Connection h_. >

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > What a weird way to ask a question ! > > My apologies. no problem, I would smiley but I know what day it is. > > Doesn't the "pre" delete the FormSplash object itself rather than the > dialog_. > > It's the equivalent of "delete this" if the Close

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > Application form being processed by the Lunatic Asylum as we speak. ha ! > Anyway, futher comment to FormSplash. You derive it from FormBaseBI which > already has a Connection h_. > > void FormBaseBI::connect() > { > h_ = d_->hideAll.connect(

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:39, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > void FormSplash::CloseCB(FL_OBJECT * ob) > > { > > FormSplash * pre = static_cast(ob->form->u_vdata); > > pre->hide(); > > delete pre->dialog_; > > pre->dialog_ = 0; > > + // wh

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:37, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Well currently I consider you to be a b@$@!?d because of all those ^M > > carriage returns > > pre->dialog_ = 0; > > + // why this? > > delete pre; > > } > > > > Unless I'm going mad

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > void FormSplash::CloseCB(FL_OBJECT * ob) > { > FormSplash * pre = static_cast(ob->form->u_vdata); > pre->hide(); > delete pre->dialog_; > pre->dialog_ = 0; > + // why this? > delete pre; > } > > This is just a pointer

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > Well currently I consider you to be a b@$@!?d because of all those ^M > carriage returns > pre->dialog_ = 0; > + // why this? > delete pre; > } > Unless I'm going mad, my patch doesn't have either of these features. I'm really confuse

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:22, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote: > > > > > > > > > This should help the iconify situation in xforms. > > > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash, > > > and remo

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote: > > > > > > This should help the iconify situation in xforms. > > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash, > > and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C > > > > john > > The Fo

Re: [PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 23 February 2001 15:07, John Levon wrote: > > > This should help the iconify situation in xforms. > It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash, > and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C > > john The FormSplash patch has gone both into this file and into the FileDi

[PATCH] xforms small changes

2001-02-23 Thread John Levon
This should help the iconify situation in xforms. It also fixes a qt2 compile problem, changes Splash, and removes the DEFAULT_LANGUAGE thing in docdlg.C john -- On Year 2000 compliance : "Unfortunately, it is not possible to gather similar assurances on the compliance of viruses." -

small changes to dependency checking

1999-07-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Because of the change from using \listfiles to scanning the log file for files used by latex, some other small changes had to be done. LaTeX runs are now down to _just_ the needed number of runs. I'd be happy if as many as possible would get the latest cvs and check that nothing wrong is