On Wednesday 09 May 2007 13:13:53 hzluo wrote:
> Who can I ask for help if I have tex2lyx problems?
> Thanks in advance :)
Ask to this mailing list. :-)
--
José Abílio
This won't go into the upcoming 1.5.0 but is a pretty nice thing to have
in early 1.6 (i.e. in a few weeks time).
Yes, I also do not expect it will be in 1.5.0.
Until then it'd be nice if the patch could made a bit more similar to
the rest of lyx on the 'cosmetic' side: I.e. spacing/indentatio
>>>>> "hzluo" == hzluo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hzluo> Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly, i.e., when a
hzluo> latex syntaxed string is pasted into lyx, it is converted to
hzluo> lyx.
hzluo> Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
hzluo wrote:
> Any comment is welcome! If you are interested,
> I can extend it to support more latex syntax.
> If possible, call tex2lyx and read the result
> out is also an option. But it may be a little
> bit slow.
I think we should try to integrate text2lyx (maybe as a library)
instead.But as
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:26:00PM -0400, hzluo wrote:
Any comment is welcome!
This won't go into the upcoming 1.5.0 but is a pretty nice thing to have
in early 1.6 (i.e. in a few weeks time).
Christmas is still months away...
Abdel.
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:26:00PM -0400, hzluo wrote:
> Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly,
> i.e., when a latex syntaxed string is pasted
> into lyx, it is converted to lyx.
Nice idea.
> Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
> command embeded in a string
Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly,
i.e., when a latex syntaxed string is pasted
into lyx, it is converted to lyx.
Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
command embeded in a string. But it can be extended
to support more latex syntax.
Test:
paste a string like:
blabla bla
Michael Gerz wrote:
Joost, after updating the installer to 1.4.3, we should also sync with
trunk! (Typically, trunk comes first but this is a special situation)
I know. When everything is ready for 1.4.3 / MiKTeX 2.5 and Uwe has made
his updates, it will go to the trunk.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
Go ahead and remove development/Win32/fakeconfig as well as all files
in the main development/Win32 directory. Only the directories
packaging and patches should stay.
Ok, I removed all files in trunk and 1.4.X branch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyx-1.4.X/development/Win32> ls
Georg Baum wrote:
Michael> 4. lyx-1.4.X/lib/syntax.default: We have a lot of references
Michael> to reLyX in this file. What shall we do with them?
You could change them to references to tex2lyx.
Not without checking please. For example, some of the comments of the form
%reLyX wi
Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 22:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> 4. lyx-1.4.X/lib/syntax.default: We have a lot of references
> Michael> to reLyX in this file. What sha
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You can also remove the lyxsocket/ directory.
I removed it...
Michael
.sh"?
Michael> Where does it come from? On my machine, "makeindex" is a
Michael> binary.
As I read it, it seems to be part of xindy.
Michael> 2. development/Win32/fakeconfig/lyxrc.defaults: This file
Michael> refers to some shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost,
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> All these things related to the old and broken MSVC files
Joost> should be removed from branch and trunk. Jean-Marc already
Joost> agreed with that.
Joost> Go ahead and remove development/Win32/fakeconfig as well as all
Joost> file
Michael Gerz wrote:
2. development/Win32/fakeconfig/lyxrc.defaults: This file refers to some
shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do we still need the files in
fakeconfig for the 1.4.X installer? Otherwise, I would like to remove
the complete directory.
All these things related to the
.defaults: This file refers to some
shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do we still need the files in
fakeconfig for the 1.4.X installer? Otherwise, I would like to remove
the complete directory.
3. development/tools/makeLyXsigc.sh: This file looks obsolete. The same
holds for development
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"John" == John Mongan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of
John> reLyX by defining each new cell to be the start of a paragraph,
John> so that the subsequent Text will have
>>>>> "John" == John Mongan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of
John> reLyX by defining each new cell to be the start of a paragraph,
John> so that the subsequent Text will have it's
When I import LaTeX documents with tables, I seem to end up with a space
prepended to each cell. This often artificially inflates the width of
the table, and is tedious to fix by hand.
I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of reLyX
by defining each new cell to be the
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX to work?
No.
> If we start to create a library of python functions and/or modules we can
> place that code in a single place but to replicate this to several
> languages/projects is not fun. :-(
Indeed. If it i
Angus Leeming wrote:
> If we really want to install these two scripts (reLyX, noweb2lyx) then
> would it be possible to use symbolic links from /usr/local/bin to the
> actual files?
I would prefer that. And the same applies for lyx2lyx. Installing them
in /usr/local/bin makes sense f
.
> The only drawback I see with having reLyX and friends in scripts/ is
> that they will not be installed in /usr/local/bin, but I am not sure
> this is really a problem.
My point is that they don't need to be installed to be used by LyX. Leave
'em in the /reLyX directory and let Ly
>>>>> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX and noweb2lyx)
>> in /scripts? I don't see why they nee
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:54, Georg Baum wrote:
> Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX and noweb2lyx) in
> /scripts? I don't see why they need own directories.
Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX to work?
Basically you need to go through all the problems tha
Angus Leeming wrote:
> 2. Change the meaning of the (1.4.x) "$$s" placeholder from its current
> meaning of "/scripts" to simply "".
The drawback of this approach is that it breaks compatibility with old user
configuration files.
Why not place all scripts (in
On Monday 17 January 2005 19:37, Angus Leeming wrote:
...
> Not only will this mean that things will work under Windows, but it will
> also mean that they'll work on *nix when we're using an uninstalled
> version of LyX.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> (I don't think that i
My /lib/lyxrc.defaults file contains the entry:
\converter latex lyx "reLyX-1.4.0cvs -f $$i" ""
This converter has never worked, not even on *nix, if I don't go to the
bother to install lyx because the script is located in the
/lib/reLyX directory and LyX can't
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Kevin Martin wrote:
> ...here is a screen capture of the error message:
Could you please stop this nonsense of posting screen shots of
_text_ messages?
Thank you.
Andre'
ing... otherwise the program seems to work fine.
> I looked at the bug list but nothing matched directly as far as I
> could tell.
>
> Thanks very much for your help,
reLyX is written in perl. Do you have perl installed? What happens if you run
reLyX on your file from
t the bug list but nothing matched directly as far as I
could tell.
Thanks
very much for your help,
Kevin Martin
___
The error says: Cannot convert
file Error while executing reLyX -f "file
name"
My version of LyX is: 1.3.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have used WONTFIX, but of course if the same but is in tex2lyx the
> bug should be transfered there with a note.
Ok, I used WONTFIX. IMHO it does not make any sense to transfer the bug to
tex2lyx, since it is fixed, and relyx still has it.
Georg
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because it works in
| tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed in relyx)?
I have used WONTFIX, but of course if the sa
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because
Georg> it works in tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will
What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because it works in
tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed in relyx)?
Georg
Am Samstag, 25. September 2004 12:56 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>
> Is this all that is needed to use tex2lyx as default latex->lyx
> translator? Or are there some importer stuff that must be done as
> well?
No, this is all, but two remarks:
- if relyx is called with the -
imp)
-# Search for an installed reLyX or a ready-to-install one
+# Search for an installed tex2lyx or a ready-to-install one
save_PATH=${PATH}
-PATH=${PATH}:./reLyX/
-SEARCH_PROG([for a LaTeX -> LyX converter],tex_to_lyx_command,reLyX)
+PATH=${PATH}:../src/tex2lyx/
+SEARCH_PROG([for a LaTeX
> >
> > I found there is
> > - reLyX and
> > - tex2lyx
> >
> > We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx
> > code which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
> >
> > Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from 1.3
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:45:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Don't waste your time. reLyX is dead, it's just that nobody's told it yet
> | and it's too stupid to have worked it out for itself. If you
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Don't waste your time. reLyX is dead, it's just that nobody's told it yet
| and it's too stupid to have worked it out for itself. If you're going to
| add longtable support, then add it to tex2lyx.
I really want to just
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 12:14:59PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
>
> I found there is
> - reLyX and
> - tex2lyx
>
> We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producin
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
>
> I found there is
> - reLyX and
> - tex2lyx
>
> We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx
> code which is only readable by Ly
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from
Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 13:16 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
> if you (or someone else) would like to get another test case, I can
> offer my thesis: About 230 pages as well, available as LyX 1.3.X file
> (and TeX, of course), exploits virtually all 1.3.X features, ERTs and
> many nasty combinations
Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 14:13 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
> If noone objects, I will consider reLyX bug reports as tex2lyx bug
> reports. I.e., if bugzilla lists a bug for reLyX that has been fixed in
> tex2lyx, I will mark the bug as "RESOLVED".
Please indicate in a comment
| that showed up when converting the userguide), and will feed them back when
| I find some time and the rest of the graphics conversion bugs are done.
Very good. (please find time )
| tex2lyx hase some problems with tables, but I don't know if reLyX is better
| there. The rest (at least my
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
process (also the environment nesting bug that was the
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
Georg> I found and fixed some bugs during this process (also the
Georg> environment nesting
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
>
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some b
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
--
Lgb
Jose' Matos wrote:
>> Nasty. Hundreds of
>> ERROR (Paragraph::DepthHook): no hook.
>
> But not with current cvs. :-)
No, that has its own problems. Try and click on the comment button :-(
--
Angus
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:13, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> > I think this bug is declared in the BUGS file of reLyX.
>
> No. The 'depth hook' book is nothing to do with the underscore in the
> label. If the underscore is removed, the
Jose' Matos wrote:
> I think this bug is declared in the BUGS file of reLyX.
No. The 'depth hook' book is nothing to do with the underscore in the
label. If the underscore is removed, the 'depth hook' nastiness still
occurs.
--
Angus
n ascertain where the real bug lies in the relyx
> output that leads to the original 'no hook' problem.
I think this bug is declared in the BUGS file of reLyX.
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
ntries.
\label{fig_comp}
Running through reLyX and then through lyx2lyx to bump the lyx format
to the current version produces
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{fig
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
_
\end_inset
comp}
\end_inset
If I edit your original latex file, rep
THe attached valid latex file , leads to bad lyx code.
(Only option is to kill lyx)
reLyX -f test.tex ; lyx test.lyx
THis is Lyx 1.3.2 on RH 9.0
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = http://brackla.anc.ed.ac.uk/
Mark van Rossum, ANC, University of Edinburgh.
Rm D7, 5 Forres
Nirmal Govind wrote:
>
> > Yes, but beware that wv2 requires libgsf from gtk, which requrires
> > glib2
>
> I got wv to work.. the conversion from .doc to .tex is good for the
> text part but not for the math part. I find that rtf2latex does a much
> better job at this since it looks like wv repl
> Yes, but beware that wv2 requires libgsf from gtk, which requrires
> glib2
I got wv to work.. the conversion from .doc to .tex is good for the
text part but not for the math part. I find that rtf2latex does a much
better job at this since it looks like wv replaces math with
"placeholder.eps" fil
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Check:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/wvware/
> > Latest version of wv is June 12, 2003 and there is a wv2 starting up
> > (June 7, 2003)
>
> Good news indeed.
> Thanks,
> Juergen.
Yes, but beware that wv2 requires libgsf from gtk, wh
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Check:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/wvware/
> Latest version of wv is June 12, 2003 and there is a wv2 starting up
> (June 7, 2003)
Good news indeed.
Thanks,
Juergen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I have good experiences with two tools: the free and GPL'ed wvware
> (wvCleanLaTeX)
> http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
> gives quite good results and is recognized by LyX as word import filter. The
> project does not look very much alive though.
Check:
http://sourceforg
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:45:23PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> > Given that nobody is keen to take up 88maintenance of reLyX and given
> > that an alternative, tex2lyx, exists, at least in current cvs, I'd
> > suggest you try this latter program.
>
> Thanks Angus..
>>>>> "Nirmal" == Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nirmal> Oh and another qn. - if relyx isn't being maintained, then why
Nirmal> not change the Import -> LaTeX option to call tex2lyx instead
Nirmal> in cvs? (I'm almost certain that
ves quite good results and is recognized by LyX as word import filter. The
project does not look very much alive though.
Even better (in terms of producing LaTeX that reLyX understands) is the
commercial tool word2tex. You need msword to run this, though.
http://www.word2tex.com
HTH,
Juergen.
> Given that nobody is keen to take up 88maintenance of reLyX and given
> that an alternative, tex2lyx, exists, at least in current cvs, I'd
> suggest you try this latter program.
Thanks Angus.. I compiled it as you directed and it worked...
actually the original file was a Wo
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 04:31:15PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. I was trying to import a latex file using the Import -> Latex
> option but it gave me an error and stopped. Here's the error:
The file would be more interesting...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gai
eading layout file
> Cleaning... Expecting `$', got \end in `
> ' at /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX/Text/TeX.pm line 397,
> line 3162. Can't locate object method "environment" via package
> "Text::TeX::Begin::Group" at /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX/Text/TeX.pm line
>
x27; at /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX/Text/TeX.pm line 397,
line 3162. Can't locate object method "environment" via package
"Text::TeX::Begin::Group" at /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX/Text/TeX.pm line
400, line 3162. Compilation failed in require at
/usr/local/bin/reLyX line 76.
>>>>> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Albert> AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile reLyX noweb2lyx, chmod 755 reLyX
Albert> noweb2lyx) runs 'chmod 755 reLyX noweb2lyx' after *each* of
Albert> Makefile reLyX noweb2lyx are generated. Howeve
>>>>> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:12:22AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
>> AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile reLyX noweb2lyx, chmod 755 reLyX
>> noweb2lyx) runs 'chmod 755 reLyX noweb2lyx' after *eac
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:12:22AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile reLyX noweb2lyx, chmod 755 reLyX noweb2lyx)
> runs 'chmod 755 reLyX noweb2lyx' after *each* of Makefile reLyX
> noweb2lyx are generated. However, you want the chmod run *only* after
> t
AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile reLyX noweb2lyx, chmod 755 reLyX noweb2lyx)
runs 'chmod 755 reLyX noweb2lyx' after *each* of Makefile reLyX
noweb2lyx are generated. However, you want the chmod run *only* after
the appropriate file is generated.
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- snip sn
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:04:30PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I'd urge you to have a look at tex2lyx first.
>
> This would not chnage the original problem, which is to know whether
> 1-column multicolumns should be changed to normal columns.
This is not a problem of any tex-to-l
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:21:59PM +0100, Karsten Heymann
Andre> wrote:
>> It seems I'll have to write an additional sanityzer
>> CleanLatex2reLyXLatex to cope with that.
Andre> I'd urge you to have a look at tex2lyx first.
This w
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:21:59PM +0100, Karsten Heymann wrote:
> It seems I'll have to write an additional sanityzer
> CleanLatex2reLyXLatex to cope with that.
I'd urge you to have a look at tex2lyx first.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have,
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:59:34 +
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Karsten.
Hello,
> reLyX may "someday soon" be retired in favour of tex2lyx, André's new
> baby. It is still very new indeed but has the advantage of using a
> proper TeX pars
Karsten Heymann wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Karsten.
reLyX may "someday soon" be retired in favour of tex2lyx, André's new
baby. It is still very new indeed but has the advantage of using a
proper TeX parser rather than regex magic acting as a psuedo tex
parser. I see that you kn
own bugs^H^H^H^Hfeatures or
> wether I should file a bug report. I'm using wvWare 0.7.4 and reLyX from
> 1.3.0.
Send me please an example .tex directly and I'll try to make tex2lyx work
on it.
> 3. reLyX improperly parses $a$$b$ (which is $ab$ but reLyX makes $a\[b$
> from it)
work (university), I came about some
problems with the LaTeX (MS Word) import of (re)LyX (wvCleanLatex). I'll
list them here to find out wether they are well-known
bugs^H^H^H^Hfeatures or wether I should file a bug report. I'm using
wvWare 0.7.4 and reLyX from 1.3.0.
1. what LaTeX code can
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:02:52AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Thank you. All is clearer now. Would verbatimItem return '4.5 \columnwidth'
> too?
Yes. It looks for something within balanced braces. Not entirely correct,
but not too far off.
> One more thing: LyX can read all of minipage's opti
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:55 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:50:30AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > >> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two?
> > >
> > > Six. - 4 5 , c M.
> > >
> > > The conversion has to be done on output.
> >
> > ??? Ok.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:50:30AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two?
> >
> > Six. - 4 5 , c M.
> >
> > The conversion has to be done on output.
>
> ??? Ok. You tokenise and then parse. Fair enough.
But wrong. Tokenization should
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:06:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx being small and independent very
>> > much.
>>
>> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two?
>
> Six. - 4 5 , c M.
>
> The conversion has to be
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:06:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx being small and independent very much.
>
> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two?
Six. - 4 5 , c M.
The conversion has to be done on output.
Andre'
--
Those who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003 10:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
...
>
> $ ./trial ' - 3.5 cM' ' + 4,5 Cm ' ' + 4.5 \columnWidth '
> ' - 3.5 cM' becomes '-3.5cm'
> ' + 4,5 Cm ' becomes '+4.5cm'
> ' + 4.5 \columnWidth ' becomes '+4.5\columnWidth'
You may miss '.3 cm'
>
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 9:40 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:38:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Should I write the equivalent of this as a function for tex2lyx using the
> > boost regex library?
>
> Overkill.
>
> Better use a simple loop over the string than adding
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:00:33AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> While I agree about being independent from boost, you will have to
> have some dependency on the lyx sources: the parsing of things like
> \section depends on the .layout files, and I do not think it would be
> wise to do a re-
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx being small and
Andre> independent very much.
While I agree about being independent from boost, you will have to
have some dependency on the lyx sources: the parsing of things like
\section dep
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:38:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Should I write the equivalent of this as a function for tex2lyx using the
> boost regex library?
Overkill.
Better use a simple loop over the string than adding a dependance on boost
stuff.
Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx bein
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 9:31 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:21:12AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > And I believe '4.5 Cm' and '4.5 cM' are valid as well...
> >
> > Geeez.
>
> Someone should check it first
That's why I gave you a little program to run, you noodle
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:21:12AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > And I believe '4.5 Cm' and '4.5 cM' are valid as well...
>
> Geeez.
Someone should check it first
> Would this suffice do you think?
> $LatexLength =~ s/^\s*([+-]?)\s*(\d+)[.,]?(\d*)\s*/$1$2.$3/;
> # Now ensu
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:47:13PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 12:00 schrieb Angus Leeming:
>> > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output:
>> >
>> > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
> including taxes) with a company called "buzz" and it was ok. No food on
> board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
> care about that for a two hours
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:36:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
> > seen Frankfurt-Glasgow for 7 EUR...
>
> How much extra for a seat?
> And how much on top of that for a seat belt?
> And how much more on top of that for a pr
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> > lottery.
>
> Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for spending my life upside down
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> lottery.
Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
seen Frankfurt-Glasgow
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:47:13PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 12:00 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output:
> >
> > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in
> >
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
> insisted June 20th.
>
> Currently I have (5 - "ok", 0 - "not ok"):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress o
Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 12:00 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output:
>
> * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in
> inverted commas to keep the LyX parser happy with "4.5 cm".
> (No
1 - 100 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
