>>>>> "Nirmal" == Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nirmal> Oh and another qn. - if relyx isn't being maintained, then why Nirmal> not change the Import -> LaTeX option to call tex2lyx instead Nirmal> in cvs? (I'm almost certain that someone's asked this before Nirmal> but...)... looks like tex2lyx works better than relyx?? There several things that reLyX does but tex2lyx cannot do. One thing is parsing layout files to be able to discover the syntax of a document (currently tex2lyx hardcodes the macros of article.cls and friends). I think this should be changed if we want to supercede reLyX. We may be able to do something about it in Chemnitz. JMarc
