On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:33:44AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > as discussed in another thread, the problem was that only the 1st
> > argument got checked, and that was just an arbitrary one (the one
> > which just happened to be adde
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:33:44AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> as discussed in another thread, the problem was that only the 1st
> argument got checked, and that was just an arbitrary one (the one
> which just happened to be added first in the frontend code). which is
> prone to errors as we saw.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:26, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:09:04AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> >> Which has no effect at all.
>> >>
>> > It does.
>>
>> can both of you please come back to this point and in more than one sentence
>> put do
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:09:04AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> Which has no effect at all.
> >>
> > It does.
>
> can both of you please come back to this point and in more than one sentence
> put down your arguments/analysis?
I am sorry, this is a behavioural pr
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Which has no effect at all.
>>
> It does.
can both of you please come back to this point and in more than one sentence
put down your arguments/analysis?
and if possible no reverts while flaming, otherwise we might have correct code
but two developers left...
than
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:29:18AM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> This is basically saying that SET_TABULAR_WIDTH should be allowed
> for longtables, because tabular_width is zero by definition for
> longtables.
> >>>It works just fine.
> >>>
> >>It does not. It allows you to
This is basically saying that SET_TABULAR_WIDTH should be allowed
for longtables, because tabular_width is zero by definition for
longtables.
It works just fine.
It does not. It allows you to execute "inset-modify tabular
set-tabular-width 7cm" for a longtable, and it happily changes the
tabl
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:20:49AM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 17-2-2011 0:17, Enrico Forestieri schreef:
> >On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:57:22PM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> Op 16-2-2011 23:19, for...@lyx.org schreef:
> >>>Author: forenr
> >>>Date: Wed Feb 16 23:19:49 20
Op 17-2-2011 0:17, Enrico Forestieri schreef:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:57:22PM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 16-2-2011 23:19, for...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: forenr
Date: Wed Feb 16 23:19:49 2011
New Revision: 37704
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37704
Log:
Don't disable
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:57:22PM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 16-2-2011 23:19, for...@lyx.org schreef:
> >Author: forenr
> >Date: Wed Feb 16 23:19:49 2011
> >New Revision: 37704
> >URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37704
> >
> >Log:
> >Don't disable apply button if one (or more
Op 16-2-2011 23:19, for...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: forenr
Date: Wed Feb 16 23:19:49 2011
New Revision: 37704
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37704
Log:
Don't disable apply button if one (or more) of vertical alignment, rotation,
or long table settings are changed. Fixes bug #7308.
Modi
11 matches
Mail list logo
