On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:26, Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:09:04AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >> Which has no effect at all. >> >> >> > It does. >> >> can both of you please come back to this point and in more than one sentence >> put down your arguments/analysis? > > I am sorry, this is a behavioural problem. I would not have any problem > discussing and even acknowledging that I could be wrong, but > there are ways to do things and the presuntuous way I cannot stand.
hehe, why do things always become fun after i go to bed? as vincent wrote, with your patch you can "execute "inset-modify tabular set-tabular-width 7cm" for a longtable, and it happily changes the table, while this lfun should have been disabled." i also see this, and it is because the function is enabled whenever tabular.tabular_width.zero() and therefore also for longtables etc as discussed in another thread, the problem was that only the 1st argument got checked, and that was just an arbitrary one (the one which just happened to be added first in the frontend code). which is prone to errors as we saw. so it seems to me that vincent's fix is the correct one. cheers, ed.
