On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:33:44AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: > > as discussed in another thread, the problem was that only the 1st > > argument got checked, and that was just an arbitrary one (the one > > which just happened to be added first in the frontend code). which is > > prone to errors as we saw. so it seems to me that vincent's fix is the > > correct one. > > Well, even if vincent's fix is correct, he himself is not correct. > > Q: Why are you reverting it? > A: Because I'm right and you're wrong. > > End of discussion, begin to give vent to one's anger. > Only later I noticed the other thread. > I am sure Vincent did not meant to hurt you with his revert. He explained in the commit log why he was reverting this. He probably should have warned you that he was going to, but this is not like there is a lot of disrespect. I am actually pretty sure you he respects you. Anyway, that was just my monthly two cents :-P Abdel.
