Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 12/08/11 23:58, Yihui Xie a écrit : I'll be glad to do 12, if JMarc has not done the job yet. How long is that supposed to be? You are very welcome to work on it. I will not have time myself. One or two pages pointing to real sweave documentation or tutorials will be enough, I guess. JMa

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 14.08.2011 22:16, schrieb Julien Rioux: Sorry, I cannot reproduce. The example file compiles perfectly to both dvi and pdf. OK, then I will report this bug to Lilypond. This is now bug 1815 of LilyPond and also accepted by the LilyPond developers. It seems that it is only a problem of us

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-14 Thread Julien Rioux
On 13/08/2011 11:01 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 12.08.2011 19:05, schrieb Julien Rioux: I solved this now. The problem is that one cannot simply call "lilypond-book". This is a python script and no executable, therefore one needs to start it with python. Furthermore only executables are automatical

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 12.08.2011 23:58, schrieb Yihui Xie: I'll be glad to do 12, if JMarc has not done the job yet. He told me that he will be busy and also in vacation in August. How long is that supposed to be? No time limit it just needs to be done. We already have a file names sweave.lyx in our examples

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 12.08.2011 19:05, schrieb Julien Rioux: I solved this now. The problem is that one cannot simply call "lilypond-book". This is a python script and no executable, therefore one needs to start it with python. Furthermore only executables are automatically found if they are in LyX's PATH variabl

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-12 Thread Yihui Xie
I'll be glad to do 12, if JMarc has not done the job yet. How long is that supposed to be? BTW, I will spend some time on the Sweave manual as well as the ticket #7555 in the next few days. Regards, Yihui -- Yihui Xie Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name Department of Statistics, Iowa Stat

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-12 Thread Julien Rioux
On 12/08/2011 11:27 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 09.08.2011 17:12, schrieb Julien Rioux: Please give it a try. I can export it to Lilypond book (LaTeX) format but not view it as PDF. I get: D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\src\support\Systemcall.cpp(238): Systemcall: 'lilypond-book --safe --pdf --latex-program=

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-12 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.08.2011 17:12, schrieb Julien Rioux: Please give it a try. I can export it to Lilypond book (LaTeX) format but not view it as PDF. I get: D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\src\support\Systemcall.cpp(238): Systemcall: 'lilypond-book --safe --pdf --latex-program=pdflatex --lily-output-dir=ly-pdf "lilypon

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.08.2011 08:24, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: 8. What does the language package setting "automatic" in the menu Document->Settings->Language do? I played a bit but the language package is always babel. Is there a case where it is not babel? Yes, if you use XeTeX and if the used languages a

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Julien Rioux
On 09/08/2011 11:17 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 09.08.2011 17:12, schrieb Julien Rioux: Oh wait, lilypond-book is a python script. For windows we probably need to spawn the python interpreter explicitly. No, this works because Python is in LyX's PATH prefix. I mean don't you need to start 'pyth

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.08.2011 17:12, schrieb Julien Rioux: Thanks Uwe, it's great that you try it out on windows and provide feedback. I am not sure why it fails at starting lilypond-book. Yes, this program tries to create a lot of files, but it should be happening in the temporary directory anyway. It isn't

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Julien Rioux
On 09/08/2011 10:54 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 09.08.2011 11:02, schrieb Julien Rioux: 10. In http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX20#lb it is told that Lilypond support is already described. Where? The module is described in the example file lilypond.lyx. Thanks, I found it now. This file is perfe

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.08.2011 11:02, schrieb Julien Rioux: 10. In http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX20#lb it is told that Lilypond support is already described. Where? The module is described in the example file lilypond.lyx. Thanks, I found it now. This file is perfect and I'll add it to the specific manuals

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/09/2011 09:58 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> 16. What is the entry "XHTML Output Options" in the document >>> settings->Output exactly for? In sec. 3.8.2.6 XHTML of the UserGuide >>> it is stated that math will be output in MathML, but in the document >>> settings I can use other engines. So what i

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.08.2011 06:56, schrieb Richard Heck: 13. In http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX20#modules there is the entry for fixltx2e. This module does only add \usepackage{fixltx2e} to the preamble, but this could also be done before. What is the benefit of this module. I think it was added just to ma

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-09 Thread Julien Rioux
Hi Uwe, On 08/08/2011 10:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 08.08.2011 05:24, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I'm currently finishing the doc update for 2.0.x. For some new features I need your help: > [...] 10. In http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX20#lb it is told that Lilypond support is already described. Wh

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 8. What does the language package setting "automatic" in the menu > Document->Settings->Language do? I played a bit but the language package > is always babel. Is there a case where it is not babel? Yes, if you use XeTeX and if the used languages are covered by polyglossia, it

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > > 14. In the document settings one can set different bibliography > > generators. What are the differences between biber, bibtex and bibtex8? > > bibtex8 allows 8-bit characters; biber (which is written in Perl) allows > full Unicode. bibtex itself will sometimes tolerate bot

Re: second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/08/2011 10:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > 13. In http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX20#modules there is the entry > for fixltx2e. This module does only add \usepackage{fixltx2e} to the > preamble, but this could also be done before. What is the benefit of > this module. > I think it was added just

second round: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.08.2011 05:24, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I'm currently finishing the doc update for 2.0.x. For some new features I need your help: 8. What does the language package setting "automatic" in the menu Document->Settings->Language do? I played a bit but the language package is always babel. Is the

Re: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > We need it to export from LyX to anything. I suppose it's only useful in > > the export dialog if you use the "send to" feature (i.e. enter a > > command in the dialog's lower widget). > > How does the "send to" feature works? This is the first time I hear that LyX > offers th

Re: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.08.2011 09:01, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: 1. What is the difference between export formats LaTeX(pdflatex), LaTeX(XeTeX) and LaTeX(LuaTeX). I know what the pdflatex variant is doing, but what do the other variants do compared to pdflatex? The different processors need some different LaT

Re: questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > 1. What is the difference between export formats LaTeX(pdflatex), > LaTeX(XeTeX) and LaTeX(LuaTeX). I know what the pdflatex variant is doing, > but what do the other variants do compared to pdflatex? The different processors need some different LaTeX output. The most visible

questions to be able to update the docs

2011-08-07 Thread Uwe Stöhr
I'm currently finishing the doc update for 2.0.x. For some new features I need your help: 1. What is the difference between export formats LaTeX(pdflatex), LaTeX(XeTeX) and LaTeX(LuaTeX). I know what the pdflatex variant is doing, but what do the other variants do compared to pdflatex? 2. We