On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> Ok, you're right. The status thing was just a first stab at something, and
> it indeed does seem it's not adequate. So can you give a complete list of
> the states you think should exist and what they mean ? I ask you only
> because you have better idea of
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Here's a really simple example:
>
> Preferences is in the xforms tree. Only half the lyxrc variables are in
> the dialog. The dialog will be completely redesigned to limit the
> possiblity of segfaults caused by tabs not fitting in the dialog width.
> It
This is a reply to several different mails...
Allan> Committed. I had to fix a couple of small things (noncopyable wasn't
Allan> removed in a couple of places and gave warnings for examlpe).
Interesting. The value of testing on different compilers, I guess.
Allan> I'd prefer it if you removed
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
|
| > On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > [...]
| > > Angus> Finally, I have made the xforms implementation of FormCopyright a
| > > Angus> derived class of FormBase and demonstrated that none of these
| > >
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> [...]
> > Angus> Finally, I have made the xforms implementation of FormCopyright a
> > Angus> derived class of FormBase and demonstrated that none of these
> > Angus> FormXXX classes need be dependent on Dialogs.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
[...]
> Angus> Finally, I have made the xforms implementation of FormCopyright a
> Angus> derived class of FormBase and demonstrated that none of these
> Angus> FormXXX classes need be dependent on Dialogs.h if they are
> Angus> passed pointers to the re
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Then perhaps we need an extra state: Pending
> > to distinguish stuff that is present in the codebase and being worked on
> > (in progress) from stuff that has a patch pending or is being worked on
> > but not i
On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> |
> | > Then perhaps we need an extra state: Pending
> | > to distinguish stuff that is present in the codebase and being worked on
> | > (in progress) from stuff th
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
|
| > Then perhaps we need an extra state: Pending
| > to distinguish stuff that is present in the codebase and being worked on
| > (in progress) from stuff that has a patch pending or is being worked on
| > but not i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I thought we were supposed to be waiting for NEW_INSETS before
| creating new collapsable stuff.
Jupp.
Lgb
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Then perhaps we need an extra state: Pending
> to distinguish stuff that is present in the codebase and being worked on
> (in progress) from stuff that has a patch pending or is being worked on
> but not in the codebase yet (pending).
>
> Allan. (ARRae)
>
Lots of feedback. Cheers!
JMarc> I thought we were supposed to be waiting for NEW_INSETS before
JMarc> creating new collapsable stuff.
Jürgen> Yes I'm also of the opinion we should now freeze the code for NEW
Jürgen> stuff! What we should still accept is GUII (porting of EXISTING
Jürgen> dialogs
On 26-Sep-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I thought we were supposed to be waiting for NEW_INSETS before
> creating new collapsable stuff.
Yes I'm also of the opinion we should now freeze the code for NEW
stuff! What we should still accept is GUII (porting of EXISTING dialogs
to the fronte
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Attached is a patch containing the replacement for InsetInfo,
Angus> InsetNote. It also contains the new files insetnote.[Ch].
Angus> Please remove insetinfo.[Ch] as they are now redundant.
Angus> In view of the on-going discussio
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Attached is a patch containing the replacement for InsetInfo, InsetNote. It
> also contains the new files insetnote.[Ch]. Please remove insetinfo.[Ch] as
> they are now redundant.
It would be nice if Painter could be extended to support the drawing o
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> >
> > > Should the GUII matrix be updated for this ?
> >
> > Not until the patch is accepted! (Anyway, if accepted, it'll mean that "Note"
> > should be removed fr
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
>
> > Should the GUII matrix be updated for this ?
>
> Not until the patch is accepted! (Anyway, if accepted, it'll mean that "Note"
> should be removed from the matrix as it is now GUI-I itself!)
>
well that'
Please, do not apply this patch. I've just done a make clean, make and found it
results in
Unresolved: C_FormCopyrightOKCB
Fix is trivial. I'll resubmit tomorrow.
Angus
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Attached is a patch containing the replacement for InsetInfo, InsetNote. It
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> Should the GUII matrix be updated for this ?
Not until the patch is accepted! (Anyway, if accepted, it'll mean that "Note"
should be removed from the matrix as it is now GUI-I itself!)
By the way, InsetError has been made GUI-I and has an xforms fronten
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> btw, attached is update for KDE status, please apply someone.
Done.
JMarc
Should the GUII matrix be updated for this ?
btw, attached is update for KDE status, please apply someone.
thanks
john
--
"They didn't know what the symbols and paradoxes meant. Instead of following
the finger that points to the moon, they sat down and worshipped the finger
itself. Instead of
Attached is a patch containing the replacement for InsetInfo, InsetNote. It
also contains the new files insetnote.[Ch]. Please remove insetinfo.[Ch] as
they are now redundant.
In view of the on-going discussion and the fact that (almost) nobody was
aware of the existing comment layout (thanks,
22 matches
Mail list logo
