On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> >
> > > Should the GUII matrix be updated for this ?
> >
> > Not until the patch is accepted! (Anyway, if accepted, it'll mean that "Note"
> > should be removed from the matrix as it is now GUI-I itself!)
>
> well that's what the "in progress" thing is for, so anyone can easily see
> what's pending ! Why should something be removed from the matrix - it is
> useful to see what has been done ... or am I missing something ?
Then perhaps we need an extra state: Pending
to distinguish stuff that is present in the codebase and being worked on
(in progress) from stuff that has a patch pending or is being worked on
but not in the codebase yet (pending).
Allan. (ARRae)
