On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:21:56PM +, John Levon wrote:
> \cong (ERT)
> \Diamond (ERT)
> \Box (ERT)
> \surd (ERT)
The following patch should fix the above symbols, and make all symbols in
mathed.lyx viewable.
There is a slight problem with the \cong hack:
\def\cong{\stackrel{_\sim}{=}}
This
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:00:21AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > For me, the following are wrong currently :
> >
> > \psi (blank)
> > \rightsquigarrow (blank)
>
> Does the attached patch helps for the above symbols?
Yes.
regards
john
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:21:56PM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> For me, the following are wrong currently :
>
> \psi (blank)
> \rightsquigarrow (blank)
Does the attached patch helps for the above symbols?
> \cong (ERT)
> \Diamond (ERT)
> \Box (ERT)
> \surd (ERT)
I'll check these symbols tomor
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:38:43PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Did you check that _all_ the symbols shown correctly ?
I have *never* had this in any frontend.
> I tried these fonts once and I think I had some missing symbols
> (perhaps \geq ?)
For me, the following are wrong currently :
\psi (b
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:24:32PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > > ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/ttf/
> >
> > Trying ... this won't fix using the symbol font case though.
>
> Actually, it does. With these fonts, and changing to use setFamily() not
> setRawName(), every
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:26:49AM +, John Levon wrote:
> When there are no font glyphs available, it's all in ERT. When there
> are, it's fine. Note that since there's no symbol font, there's no \Surd
> ... and the wasi is missing too.
>
> Andre, is this patch OK ?
If it works. It's certainl
OK, with the below patch, Qt behaves sensibly now.
When there are no font glyphs available, it's all in ERT. When there
are, it's fine. Note that since there's no symbol font, there's no \Surd
... and the wasi is missing too.
Andre, is this patch OK ?
regards
john
Index: mathed/math_factory.C
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:44:21AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> There is a "Standard Symbols I" for Qt on RH-8.0, does that contain
> the correct font?
No, it does not have the symbols we need (checked with qfd)
> | 3) provide an RPM of those tex ttf fonts for RH8.0 users (what is their
>
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:12:54PM +, John Levon wrote:
|
| > It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt
| > cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol :
|
| I have made a patch that works with Qt 3 on RH8.0. I'm buildi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:12:54PM +, John Levon wrote:
> It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt
> cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol :
I have made a patch that works with Qt 3 on RH8.0. I'm building Qt 2
frontend now with the patch. I think our bes
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:43:13PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > Can you put the postscript fonts (cmsy10.pfb etc.) in .fonts ?
>
> It does not work.
Actually, fc-cache find the fonts, but something weird goes on.
> > ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/ttf/
>
> Trying ..
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:22:12AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Can you put the postscript fonts (cmsy10.pfb etc.) in .fonts ?
It does not work.
> ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/ttf/
Trying ... this won't fix using the symbol font case though.
regards
john
--
"ALL t
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:12:54PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:01:02AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt
> cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol :
>
> if (qt_has_xft) {
> + use_xcore_fo
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:01:02AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> font.setFamily("symbol")
> instead of
> font.setRawName("-*-symbol-...")
It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt
cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol :
if (qt_has_xft) {
+ use_x
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:43:26PM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> ok Andre I see what's happening. Our attempt to set the symbol font is
> failing (and all other fonts). So only the symbol font is mis-displayed,
> as you mentioned that mathed assumes smymbol font is available.
>
> So mathed is beh
ok Andre I see what's happening. Our attempt to set the symbol font is
failing (and all other fonts). So only the symbol font is mis-displayed,
as you mentioned that mathed assumes smymbol font is available.
So mathed is behaving correctly I think, we have to investiagate why
setRawName is faili
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> |
> | > Maybe this info should go in the INSTALL?
> |
> | Probably ;-}
>
> I am getting more and more reluctan
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change...
> > how much manual config does the user have to do to make this work?
>
> I don't know. I guess
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:53] wrote:
> * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > | > what do I need to do to get the new s
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Currently, I get:
> aleem> cd /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm
> aleem> mkfontdir .
> aleem> more fonts.dir
> 0
> aleem>
That's exactly what I get, so maybe we should simply wait for
enlightenment.
Or read some
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote:
> > I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change...
> > how much manual config does the user have to do to make this wor
On Friday 31 August 2001 16:05, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
>
> Good question. I don't know ;-)
>
> > I have teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> | > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
> |
> | Good question. I don't know ;-)
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change...
> how much manual config does the user have to do to make this work?
I don't know. I guess it's about four or five lines
mkdir $1
cd $1
somehow create fonts.dir
#
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
Good question. I don't know ;-)
> I have teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if so,
> what and where from?
You do not need to download anything
what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed? I have
teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if so, what and where
from?
Maybe this info should go in the INSTALL?
Angus
26 matches
Mail list logo
