Le 24/04/2016 04:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I like the patch you attached. Although I understand your
dissatisfaction that it doesn't completely fix one of the regressions
you were targetting, it is nice to get rid of that hack and more
importantly to solve the crash.
Please commit this patc
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:56:11AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 21/04/2016 21:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > Guillaume, do you think it is reasonable to revert this commit with
> > respect to 2.2.0? Even if we were able to quickly fix it, it seems this
> > might be sensitive code.
> >
>
Le 23/04/2016 01:54, bruce muirhead a écrit :
On 22/04/16 13:37, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 22/04/2016 03:56, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 21/04/2016 21:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Also, since Guillaume had made some improvements to this commit, it
might be nice to know if Bruce still sees t
On 22/04/16 13:37, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 22/04/2016 03:56, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 21/04/2016 21:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Also, since Guillaume had made some improvements to this commit, it
might be nice to know if Bruce still sees the problem on 2.3-staging.
Bruce, can you do th
Le 22/04/2016 03:56, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 21/04/2016 21:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Also, since Guillaume had made some improvements to this commit, it
might be nice to know if Bruce still sees the problem on 2.3-staging.
Bruce, can you do the following?
git checkout 2.3-staging
and c
Le 21/04/2016 21:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02:47PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM
On 22/04/16 11:27, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 22/04/2016 02:55, bruce muirhead a écrit :
On 22/04/16 10:24, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Thanks for that information Guillaume. I am learning as I go, so some
simple mistakes are happening and I apologise for that.
No need to apologise for anything. Tha
Le 22/04/2016 02:55, bruce muirhead a écrit :
On 22/04/16 10:24, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Thanks for that information Guillaume. I am learning as I go, so some
simple mistakes are happening and I apologise for that.
No need to apologise for anything. Thanks for all the test and
especially for rep
On 22/04/16 10:24, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 22/04/2016 02:04, bruce muirhead a écrit :
On 22/04/16 06:04, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02:47PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead
Le 22/04/2016 02:04, bruce muirhead a écrit :
On 22/04/16 06:04, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02:47PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak
On 22/04/16 06:04, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02:47PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +100
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02:47PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> > > On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:37:24PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> > > On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:25:44PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm sorry for the unclear instructions. Thanks for sticking with it.
> >
> > Scott
> >
>
> Scott, while I think of it.
>
> This is the first time, in years of using Lyx, where I have had it fail to
> compile for some re
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +100
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +100
I'm sorry for the unclear instructions. Thanks for sticking with it.
Scott
Scott, while I think of it.
This is the first time, in years of using Lyx, where I have had it fail
to compile for some reason not associated with my lack of knowledge, and
therefore doing something wrong.
If I h
On 21/04/16 16:56, Pavel Sanda wrote:
bruce muirhead wrote:
bruce@debian:~/lyx$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 755 revisions left to test after this (roughly 10 steps)
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
checkout:
po/ar.gmo
...
po/zh_TW.po
Pleas
On 21/04/16 15:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +100
bruce muirhead wrote:
> bruce@debian:~/lyx$ git bisect good
> Bisecting: 755 revisions left to test after this (roughly 10 steps)
> error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
> checkout:
> po/ar.gmo
...
> po/zh_TW.po
> Please, commit your changes or stash
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:22:43PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> > > On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> >
On 21/04/16 15:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 09:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:20:04AM +100
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:26:12PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> > > On 21/04/16 09:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:20:04AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> >
On 21/04/16 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 09:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:20:04AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 03:34, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:39:19PM +020
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> On 21/04/16 09:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:20:04AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> > > On 21/04/16 03:34, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrot
On 21/04/16 09:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:20:04AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 21/04/16 03:34, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Clearly the problem had to be
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:47:38PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 20/04/2016 18:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
> >
> > And to confirm: you *can* insert a citation when you compile 2.1.0
> > (i.e. you have the same findings as Bruce) ?
>
> Sure, citations work fine with LyX-2.1.4 and op
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:20:04AM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
> On 21/04/16 03:34, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
> > > > Clearly the problem had to be my particular debian setup.
On 21/04/16 03:34, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Clearly the problem had to be my particular debian setup.
My first port of call was to change the window manager I have been
using, from
On 21/04/16 02:40, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Le 20/04/2016 13:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Clearly the problem had to be my particular debian setup.
My first port of call was to change the window manager I have been
using, from
xfce running on openbox to xfwm4.
This completely removed the p
Le 20/04/2016 18:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
And to confirm: you *can* insert a citation when you compile 2.1.0
(i.e. you have the same findings as Bruce) ?
Sure, citations work fine with LyX-2.1.4 and openbox.
I've read your post about bisect.
If I understand correctly, I should bisect be
On 04/20/2016 08:39 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
>
>> I have, apparently, been wasting your time, but all I can say is thank
>> you---without confirmation that the file worked, I would not have found
>> what was causing my problem.
>
> Don't worry,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
> > Clearly the problem had to be my particular debian setup.
> >
> > My first port of call was to change the window manager I have been
> > using, from xfce running on openbox to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:40:22PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 20/04/2016 13:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
>
> > Clearly the problem had to be my particular debian setup.
> >
> > My first port of call was to change the window manager I have been using,
> > from
> > xfce running on ope
Le 20/04/2016 17:40, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
In addition, some citations appear as TeX code, others as insets (see snapshot
attached).
Oups, same with Gnome and Openbox.
--
Jean-Pierre
Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Clearly the problem had to be my particular debian setup.
My first port of call was to change the window manager I have been
using, from xfce running on openbox to xfwm4.
This completely removed the problem, and all is now working as it
should, alth
On 20/04/16 22:03, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/04/2016 11:55, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Attached is the beginning of a paper which I am currently drafting, and
the bib file. This is the file with which I first tested 2.2.0rc1.
I use Jabref, so have attached the Jabref created bibliography
Le 20/04/2016 11:55, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Attached is the beginning of a paper which I am currently drafting, and
the bib file. This is the file with which I first tested 2.2.0rc1.
I use Jabref, so have attached the Jabref created bibliography file.
Needless to say, my latex is texlive.
I
Le 20/04/2016 10:55, bruce muirhead a écrit :
Attached is the beginning of a paper which I am currently drafting, and the bib
file. This is the file with which I first tested 2.2.0rc1.
I use Jabref, so have attached the Jabref created bibliography file.
Needless to say, my latex is texlive.
On 20/04/16 19:17, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Le 20 avril 2016 08:48:16 CEST, bruce muirhead a
écrit :
On 20/04/16 17:21, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Hmm, seems rather Debian Stretch (testing) than Jessie (stable) to
me,
All I can say is that there are no testing or unstable reposit
Le 20 avril 2016 08:48:16 CEST, bruce muirhead a
écrit :
>On 20/04/16 17:21, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, seems rather Debian Stretch (testing) than Jessie (stable) to
>me,
>All I can say is that there are no testing or unstable repositories in
>my apt sources.list
>
>I have wonder
On 20/04/16 19:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/04/2016 03:32, Bruce Muirhead a écrit :
The configure log shows messages such as:
configure:5704: g++ -V >&5
g++: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
g++: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
I have attached the full
Le 20/04/2016 03:32, Bruce Muirhead a écrit :
The configure log shows messages such as:
configure:5704: g++ -V >&5
g++: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
g++: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
I have attached the full configuration log.
At least this part is OK.
On 20/04/16 15:27, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:19:51PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
On 20/04/16 14:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
From: Scott Kostyshak
Yes, this is all great information. Thank you
On 20/04/16 17:21, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a
new file (using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or e
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a new file
(using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit citations. Everything else
appears to work
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:19:51PM +1000, bruce muirhead wrote:
>
> On 20/04/16 14:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>From: Scott Kostyshak
> >>
> >>> Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating.
On 20/04/16 14:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>>
>>
>>From: Scott Kostyshak
>>
>>> Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating. It
>>> would be useful to figure out why 2.1.4 works for you and 2.2.0rc1
doe
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:21:02AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>
>
> From: Scott Kostyshak
>
> >Yes, this is all great information. Thank you for investigating. It
> >would be useful to figure out why 2.1.4 works for you and 2.2.0rc1 does>not.
> >Can you run the command "ldd" on the comp
From: Scott Kostyshak
To: Bruce Muirhead
Cc: LyX Developers
Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016, 13:20
Subject: Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 insert-citation problems
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:56:08AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>
>
> From: Scott Kostyshak
> To: lyx-devel@l
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:56:08AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
>
>
> From: Scott Kostyshak
> To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016, 12:10
> Subject: Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 insert-citation problems
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +00
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
>
> Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a new file
> (using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit citations. Everything
> else appe
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a new file
(using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit citations. Everything else
appears to work efficiently and effectively.
I suspect a configuration problem c
53 matches
Mail list logo
