Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1 [PATCH for lyx.spec file]

On czwartek 25 lipiec 2002 12:57 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Kuba" == Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kuba> Please replace the %build section in the spec file with this > Kuba> one, it should then work fine for gcc 3.[12] > > Where is the fix? It was supposed to be copy&pas

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1 [FIX for lyx.spec file]

> "Kuba" == Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kuba> Please replace the %build section in the spec file with this Kuba> one, it should then work fine for gcc 3.[12] Where is the fix? JMarc

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1 [FIX for lyx.spec file]

On Monday 22 July 2002 3:15 pm, Kuba Ober wrote: > I wonder whether grep -e should be replaced with egrep for portability ? This is probably not relevant to your platform, but on mine (Dec Alpha running Tru64 unix) this is what the grep man page has to say about grep/egrep: The commands grep

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1 [FIX for lyx.spec file]

> > > I have 3.1 running and can compile 1.2.1cvs > > > > I cannot :-((( > > > > gcc-3.1, xforms-0.96, up-to-date rawhide system > > Did you configure --with-included-strings? > > If so, why? The specfile in the source rpm is a bit dumb :-( Here's how the working %build should look like %build

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:41:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: >>> I had to make several passes at compiling 3.1 to get LyX-1.2 to compile. The things I added as I went along were

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Andre Poenitz wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:41:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: >> > I had to make several passes at compiling 3.1 to get LyX-1.2 to compile. >> > The things I added as I went along were objc, --enable-cpp, and >> > --enab

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:32:10AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > > I have 3.1 running and can compile 1.2.1cvs > > I cannot :-((( > > gcc-3.1, xforms-0.96, up-to-date rawhide system Did you configure --with-included-strings? If so, why? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

On środa 17 lipiec 2002 09:54 am, you wrote: > Kuba Ober wrote: > > Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ > > xforms-0.89)? > > what patches do you need? > > I have 3.1 running and can compile 1.2.1cvs I cannot :-((( gcc-3.1, xforms-0.96, up-to-date rawhide system

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:41:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I had to make several passes at compiling 3.1 to get LyX-1.2 to compile. > The things I added as I went along were objc, --enable-cpp, and > --enable-threads Don't know which did the trick. The interesting part would be why it did

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:38:42AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ > xforms-0.89)? Such patches should not be necessary. But theory and praxis are only theoretical the same. So what goes wrong if you try that cobination? Andre' -

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

> "Kuba" == Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kuba> Hi, Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under Kuba> gcc-3.1 (+ xforms-0.89)? Cheers, Kuba Ober Can you be more precise on the kind of problems you encouter? JMarc

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

Kuba Ober wrote: > Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ > xforms-0.89)? what patches do you need? I have 3.1 running and can compile 1.2.1cvs Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

Hi, Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ xforms-0.89)? Cheers, Kuba Ober